Literature DB >> 27180892

Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation In and On the Way to the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory.

Preethi William1, Prashant Rao, Uday B Kanakadandi, Alejandro Asencio, Karl B Kern.   

Abstract

Cardiac arrest, though not common during coronary angiography, is increasingly occurring in the catheterization laboratory because of the expanding complexity of percutaneous interventions (PCI) and the patient population being treated. Manual chest compression in the cath lab is not easily performed, often interrupted, and can result in the provider experiencing excessive radiation exposure. Mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) provides unique advantages over manual performance of chest compression for treating cardiac arrest in the cardiac cath lab. Such advantages include the potential for uninterrupted chest compressions, less radiation exposure, better quality chest compressions, and less crowded conditions around the catheterization table, allowing more attention to ongoing PCI efforts during CPR. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients not responding to standard ACLS therapy can be transported to the hospital while mechanical CPR is being performed to provide safe and continuous chest compressions en route. Once at the hospital, advanced circulatory support can be instituted during ongoing mechanical CPR. This article summarizes the epidemiology, pathophysiology and nature of cardiac arrest in the cardiac cath lab and discusses the mechanics of CPR and defibrillation in that setting. It also reviews the various types of mechanical CPR and their potential roles in and on the way to the laboratory. (Circ J 2016; 80: 1292-1299).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27180892     DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-16-0330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ J        ISSN: 1346-9843            Impact factor:   2.993


  3 in total

1.  In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: Effective Transition from an ICU- to CCU-Led Resuscitation Team.

Authors:  Rajat Sharma; Hilary Bews; Hardeep Mahal; Chantal Y Asselin; Megan O'Brien; Lillian Koley; Brett Hiebert; John Ducas; Davinder S Jassal
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 2.279

2.  Comparison of hemodynamic effects and resuscitation outcomes between automatic simultaneous sterno-thoracic cardiopulmonary resuscitation device and LUCAS in a swine model of cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Kyoung-Chul Cha; Hyung Il Kim; Yong Won Kim; Gyo Jin Ahn; Yoon Seob Kim; Sun Ju Kim; Jun Hyuk Lee; Sung Oh Hwang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Cardiac Arrest in the Catheterization Laboratory.

Authors:  Kapil Yadav; Huu Tam Truong
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2018
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.