Literature DB >> 27180627

Planned vaginal delivery versus planned cesarean delivery in cases of low-lying placenta.

Atsuko Taga1, Yukiyasu Sato1, Chieko Sakae1, Yumiko Satake1, Ikuko Emoto1, Shunsuke Maruyama1, Hiroko Mise1, Tomoko Kim1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the applicability of trial of labor in cases of low-lying placenta.
METHODS: In this observational cohort study, we collected data from the women with low-lying placenta delivered at our hospital between April 2012 and December 2015. Low-lying placenta was diagnosed when the length from the placental lowest edge to the internal cervical os (placenta-os distance) was 0-20 mm at 36 gestational weeks. Planned mode of delivery for each case was determined by patient's preference. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared between the planned vaginal delivery group (N = 11) and the planned cesarean delivery group (N = 7).
RESULTS: All the women in the planned cesarean delivery group underwent scheduled cesarean section at 37-38 gestational weeks. Three cases in the planned vaginal delivery group required emergency cesarean section for uncontrollable antepartum bleeding. The intrapartum blood loss was significantly smaller in the planned vaginal delivery group than in the planned cesarean delivery group (946 ± 204 g vs. 1649 ± 256 g, p = 0.047). Umbilical arterial blood pH was similar between the two groups. All the women requiring emergency cesarean section were accompanied by marginal sinus.
CONCLUSIONS: Trial of labor can be offered to all the women with low-lying placenta except for those accompanied by marginal sinus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antepartum bleeding; marginal sinus; placenta previa; placental migration; transvaginal ultrasonography

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27180627     DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2016.1181168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med        ISSN: 1476-4954


  2 in total

1.  Risk of preterm birth for placenta previa or low-lying placenta and possible preventive interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Charlotte H J R Jansen; Charlotte E van Dijk; C Emily Kleinrouweler; Jacob J Holzscherer; Anouk C Smits; Jacqueline C E J M Limpens; Brenda M Kazemier; Elisabeth van Leeuwen; Eva Pajkrt
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 6.055

2.  Mode of birth in women with low-lying placenta: protocol for a prospective multicentre 1:3 matched case-control study in Italy (the MODEL-PLACENTA study).

Authors:  Sara Ornaghi; Elisabetta Colciago; Isadora Vaglio Tessitore; Alessandra Abbamondi; Laura Antolini; Anna Locatelli; Annalisa Inversetti; Armando Pintucci; I Cetin; Benedetta Bracco; Elisa Fabbri; Valentina Sala; Mario Meroni; Grazia Volpe; Sara Benedetti; Camilla Bulfoni; Annamaria Marconi; Federica Lagrasta; Cinzia Lucia Paolini; Elisabetta Mazza; Massimo Candiani; Luca Valsecchi; Maddalena Smid; Federica Pasi; Mirko Pozzoni; Maria Castoldi; Michele Vignali; Giulia Dal Molin; Alice Guarano; Antonio Pellegrino; Clelia Callegari; Marta Betti; Sara Lazzarin; Federico Prefumo; Cristina Zanardini; Valentina Parolin; Anna Catalano; Edoardo Barbolini; Patrizio Antonazzo; Lucrezia Pignatti; Mauro Tintoni; Federico Spelzini; Anna Martinelli; Fabio Facchinetti; G Chiossi; Patrizia Vergani
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.