Literature DB >> 27180608

Spatial Autocorrelation in Mass Spectrometry Imaging.

Alberto Cassese1, Shane R Ellis2, Nina Ogrinc Potočnik2, Elke Burgermeister3, Matthias Ebert3, Axel Walch4, Arn M J M van den Maagdenberg5, Liam A McDonnell6,7,8, Ron M A Heeren2, Benjamin Balluff2.   

Abstract

Mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) is a powerful molecular imaging technique. In microprobe MSI, images are created through a grid-wise interrogation of individual spots by mass spectrometry across a surface. Classical statistical tests for within-sample comparisons fail as close-by measurement spots violate the assumption of independence of these tests, which can lead to an increased false-discovery rate. For spatial data, this effect is referred to as spatial autocorrelation. In this study, we investigated spatial autocorrelation in three different matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization MSI data sets. These data sets cover different molecular classes (metabolites/drugs, lipids, and proteins) and different spatial resolutions ranging from 20 to 100 μm. Significant spatial autocorrelation was detected in all three data sets and found to increase with decreasing pixel size. To enable statistical testing for differences in mass signal intensities between regions of interest within MSI data sets, we propose the use of Conditional Autoregressive (CAR) models. We show that, by accounting for spatial autocorrelation, discovery rates (i.e., the ratio between the features identified and the total number of features) could be reduced between 21% and 69%. The reliability of this approach was validated by control mass signals based on prior knowledge. In light of the advent of larger MSI data sets based on either an increased spatial resolution or 3D data sets, accounting for effects due to spatial autocorrelation becomes even more indispensable. Here, we propose a generic and easily applicable workflow to enable within-sample statistical comparisons.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27180608     DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b00672

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  9 in total

Review 1.  Unsupervised machine learning for exploratory data analysis in imaging mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Nico Verbeeck; Richard M Caprioli; Raf Van de Plas
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 10.946

2.  Integrated molecular imaging reveals tissue heterogeneity driving host-pathogen interactions.

Authors:  James E Cassat; Jessica L Moore; Kevin J Wilson; Zach Stark; Boone M Prentice; Raf Van de Plas; William J Perry; Yaofang Zhang; John Virostko; Daniel C Colvin; Kristie L Rose; Audra M Judd; Michelle L Reyzer; Jeffrey M Spraggins; Caroline M Grunenwald; John C Gore; Richard M Caprioli; Eric P Skaar
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 17.956

3.  Unsupervised segmentation of mass spectrometric ion images characterizes morphology of tissues.

Authors:  Dan Guo; Kylie Bemis; Catherine Rawlins; Jeffrey Agar; Olga Vitek
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Quantitative Spatial Analysis of Metabolic Heterogeneity Across in vivo and in vitro Tumor Models.

Authors:  Tiffany M Heaster; Bennett A Landman; Melissa C Skala
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Spatial differentiation of metabolism in prostate cancer tissue by MALDI-TOF MSI.

Authors:  Maria K Andersen; Therese S Høiem; Britt S R Claes; Benjamin Balluff; Marta Martin-Lorenzo; Elin Richardsen; Sebastian Krossa; Helena Bertilsson; Ron M A Heeren; Morten B Rye; Guro F Giskeødegård; Tone F Bathen; May-Britt Tessem
Journal:  Cancer Metab       Date:  2021-01-29

6.  Identifying multicellular spatiotemporal organization of cells with SpaceFlow.

Authors:  Honglei Ren; Benjamin L Walker; Zixuan Cang; Qing Nie
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 17.694

7.  A methodological approach to correlate tumor heterogeneity with drug distribution profile in mass spectrometry imaging data.

Authors:  Mridula Prasad; Geert Postma; Pietro Franceschi; Lavinia Morosi; Silvia Giordano; Francesca Falcetta; Raffaella Giavazzi; Enrico Davoli; Lutgarde M C Buydens; Jeroen Jansen
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 6.524

8.  Simultaneous Detection of Zinc and Its Pathway Metabolites Using MALDI MS Imaging of Prostate Tissue.

Authors:  Maria K Andersen; Sebastian Krossa; Therese S Høiem; Rebecca Buchholz; Britt S R Claes; Benjamin Balluff; Shane R Ellis; Elin Richardsen; Helena Bertilsson; Ron M A Heeren; Tone F Bathen; Uwe Karst; Guro F Giskeødegård; May-Britt Tessem
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 9.  Experimental and Data Analysis Considerations for Three-Dimensional Mass Spectrometry Imaging in Biomedical Research.

Authors:  D R N Vos; S R Ellis; B Balluff; R M A Heeren
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 3.488

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.