| Literature DB >> 27180578 |
Pamela Testardini1,2, María Lucía Gallo Vaulet2, Andrea Carolina Entrocassi2, Claudia Menghi3, Martha Cora Eliseht4, Claudia Gatta3, Mirta Losada1, María Sol Touzón1, Ana Corominas2, Carlos Vay1, Silvio Tatti4, Angela Famiglietti1, Marcelo Rodriguez Fermepin2, Beatriz Perazzi1.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate different methods for Trichomonas vaginalis diagnosis during pregnancy in order to prevent maternal and perinatal complications. A total of 386 vaginal exudates from pregnant women were analyzed. T. vaginalis was investigated by 3 types of microscopic examinations direct wet mount with physiologic saline solution, prolonged May-Grunwald Giemsa (MGG) staining, and wet mount with sodium-acetate-formalin (SAF)/methylene blue method. PCR for 18S rRNA gene as well as culture in liquid medium were performed. The sensitivity and specificity of the microscopic examinations were evaluated considering the culture media positivity or the PCR techniques as gold standard. The frequency of T. vaginalis infection was 6.2% by culture and/or PCR, 5.2% by PCR, 4.7% by culture, 3.1% by SAF/methylene blue method and 2.8% by direct wet smear and prolonged MGG staining. The sensitivities were 83.3%, 75.0%, 50.0%, and 45.8% for PCR, culture, SAF/methylene blue method, and direct wet smear-prolonged MGG staining, respectively. The specificity was 100% for all the assessed methods. Microscopic examinations showed low sensitivity, mainly in asymptomatic pregnant patients. It is necessary to improve the detection of T. vaginalis using combined methods providing higher sensitivity, such as culture and PCR, mainly in asymptomatic pregnant patients, in order to prevent maternal and perinatal complications.Entities:
Keywords: Argentina; Trichomonas vaginalis; diagnosis; pregnancy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27180578 PMCID: PMC4870974 DOI: 10.3347/kjp.2016.54.2.191
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Parasitol ISSN: 0023-4001 Impact factor: 1.341
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the ROC curve of the different diagnostic methods for T. vaginalis in pregnant patients
| Method | Sensitivity | Specificity | Positive predictive value | Negative predictive value | Area under curve ROC | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | (95% CI) | % | (95% CI) | % | (95% CI) | % | (95% CI) | % | (95% CI) | |
| Wet mount with saline[ | 45.8 | (26.2-66.8) | 100 | (99.0-100) | 100 | (71.5-100) | 96.5 | (94.0-98.1) | 0.73 ± 0.07 | (0.60-0.86) |
| Wet mount with SAF/methylene blue | 50.0 | (29.7-70.4) | 100 | (99.0-100) | 100 | (73.5-100) | 96.8 | (94.3-98.3) | 0.75 ± 0.07 | (0.62-0.88) |
| Culture | 75.0 | (53.3-90.2) | 100 | (99.0-100) | 100 | (81.5-100) | 98.4 | (96.5-99.4) | 0.88 ± 0.06 | (0.77-0.98) |
| PCR | 83.3 | (62.6-95.3) | 100 | (99.0-100) | 100 | (83.2-100) | 98.9 | (97.2-99.7) | 0.92 ± 0.05 | (0.82-1.00) |
ROC, receiver operating characteristic; CI, confidence interval; SAF, sodium acetate-acetic acid-formalin.
physiological saline solution.
May-Grunwald Giemsa.