Literature DB >> 27180259

Updated 2013 College of American Pathologists/American Society of Clinical Oncology (CAP/ASCO) guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) testing increase HER2 positive and HER2 equivocal breast cancer cases; retrospective study of HER2 FISH results of 836 invasive breast cancers.

Kamaljeet Singh1, Umadevi Tantravahi2, Michele M Lomme3, Terese Pasquariello4, Margaret Steinhoff3, C James Sung3.   

Abstract

For dual probe HER2 FISH assay, the 2013 CAP/ASCO guideline recommendations lowered the HER2/CEP17 ratio cut off for HER2 amplification to ≥2.0 and introduced an average HER2 copy number criterion for HER2 amplification (≥6.0/cell) and HER2 equivocal categories (≥4 and <6/cell). The HER2/CEP17 equivocal category is eliminated. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of 2013 HER2 FISH testing guideline recommendations update on the assignment of HER2 status with dual probe HER2 FISH assay. Dual probe HER2 FISH assay results on breast cancers from 09/2009 to 07/2015 that underwent reflex HER2 FISH testing after equivocal HER2 (2+) immunohistochemistry (IHC) were reviewed. HER2 copy number, CEP17 signals, and HER2/CEP ratios were noted. HER2 status was assigned as HER2 negative (HER2-), HER2 equivocal (HER2e), and HER2 amplified (HER2+) by applying both 2007 and 2013 CAP/ASCO HER2 FISH guideline recommendations and results were compared. New guidelines reclassified HER2 FISH status in a significant proportion of cases (8.3 %, 69/836; p = .021). There were 22 (2.6 %) more HER2+, 17 (2.1 %) more HER2e, and 39 (4.1 %) fewer HER2- tumors. Change of HER2 status correlated significantly with ≥3 CEP17 signals (38 vs. 2 %; p < .001). The 2013 CAP/ASCO guideline recommendations for HER2 FISH testing by dual probe assay increased the HER2 amplified and HER2 equivocal tumors. Increase in HER2 equivocal tumors would potentially increase the frequency of repeat HER2 testing. Tumors with ≥3 CEP17 signals, so-called chromosome 17 polysomy, are more likely to be impacted and classified as HER2 equivocal.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ASCO; Breast cancer; CAP; Equivocal; FISH; HER2; Polysomy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27180259     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-3824-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  11 in total

1.  The implementation of a commercially available multi-gene profile test for breast cancer characterization in a department of pathology: what have we learned from the first 100 cases?

Authors:  Cristina Pelliccia; Emanuele Caselli; Martina Mandarano; Rachele Del Sordo; Guido Bellezza; Angelo Sidoni
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Clinicopathologic features of breast cancer reclassified as HER2-amplified by fluorescence in situ hybridization with alternative chromosome 17 probes.

Authors:  Kristen C Blanton; Allison M Deal; Kathleen A Kaiser-Rogers; Carey K Anders; Siobhan M O'Connor; Johann D Hertel; Benjamin C Calhoun
Journal:  Ann Diagn Pathol       Date:  2020-08-08       Impact factor: 2.090

3.  Relationship between Ribosomal Protein S6-pS240 Expression and other Prognostic Factors in Non-Special Type Invasive Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Frederik Cuperjani; Lumturije Gashi; Fisnik Kurshumliu; Shemsedin Dreshaj; Fitim Selimi
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Regional Variability in Percentage of Breast Cancers Reported as Positive for HER2 in California: Implications of Patient Demographics on Laboratory Benchmarks.

Authors:  Chieh-Yu Lin; Eugene E Carneal; Daphne Y Lichtensztajn; Scarlett L Gomez; Christina A Clarke; Kristin C Jensen; Allison W Kurian; Kimberly H Allison
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 5.400

5.  Discordance of the estrogen receptor and HER-2/neu in breast cancer from primary lesion to first and second metastatic site.

Authors:  Elyse E Lower; Shagufta Khan; Diane Kennedy; Robert P Baughman
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2017-08-02

6.  Annexin A3 as a Prognostic Biomarker for Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Tao Zhou; Yong Li; Li Yang; Tiantian Tang; Lina Zhang; Jiajie Shi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  First-in-human phase 0 study of 111In-CHX-A"-DTPA trastuzumab for HER2 tumor imaging.

Authors:  K A Kurdziel; E Mena; Y McKinney; K Wong; S Adler; T Sissung; J Lee; S Lipkowitz; L Lindenberg; B Turkbey; S Kummar; D E Milenic; J H Doroshow; W D Figg; M J Merino; C H Paik; M W Brechbiel; P L Choyke
Journal:  J Transl Sci       Date:  2018-07-13

8.  Fast fluorescence in situ hybridisation for the enhanced detection of MET in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  David Jonathan Duncan; Michel Erminio Vandenberghe; Marietta Louise Juanita Scott; Craig Barker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Precise ERBB2 copy number assessment in breast cancer by means of molecular inversion probe array analysis.

Authors:  Matthias Christgen; Jana L van Luttikhuizen; Mieke Raap; Peter Braubach; Lars Schmidt; Danny Jonigk; Friedrich Feuerhake; Ulrich Lehmann; Brigitte Schlegelberger; Hans H Kreipe; Doris Steinemann
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-12-13

10.  Impact on survival of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and Ki-67 expression discordance pre- and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Yuqin Ding; Kaijing Ding; Hongdan Qian; Xingfei Yu; Dehong Zou; Hongjian Yang; Wenju Mo; Xiangming He; Fanrong Zhang; Chengdong Qin; Yurong Zheng; Xiaowen Ding
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.