Literature DB >> 27180193

Quantifying the plant actin cytoskeleton response to applied pressure using nanoindentation.

Rémi Branco1, Eliza-Jane Pearsall2, Chelsea A Rundle1, Rosemary G White3, Jodie E Bradby2, Adrienne R Hardham4.   

Abstract

Detection of potentially pathogenic microbes through recognition by plants and animals of both physical and chemical signals associated with the pathogens is vital for host well-being. Signal perception leads to the induction of a variety of responses that augment pre-existing, constitutive defences. The plant cell wall is a highly effective preformed barrier which becomes locally reinforced at the infection site through delivery of new wall material by the actin cytoskeleton. Although mechanical stimulation can produce a reaction, there is little understanding of the nature of physical factors capable of triggering plant defence. Neither the magnitude of forces nor the contact time required has been quantified. In the study reported here, mechanical stimulation with a tungsten microneedle has been used to quantify the response of Arabidopsis plants expressing an actin-binding protein tagged with green fluorescent protein (GFP) to reveal the organisation of the actin cytoskeleton. Using confocal microscopy, the response time for actin reorganisation in epidermal cells of Arabidopsis hypocotyls was shown to be 116 ± 49 s. Using nanoindentation and a diamond spherical tip indenter, the magnitude of the forces capable of triggering an actin response has been quantified. We show that Arabidopsis hypocotyl cells can detect a force as small as 4 μN applied for as short a time as 21.6 s to trigger reorganisation of the actin cytoskeleton. This force is an order of magnitude less than the potential invasive force determined for a range of fungal and oomycete plant pathogens. To our knowledge, this is the first quantification of the magnitude and duration of mechanical forces capable of stimulating a structural defence response in a plant cell.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Applied force; Arabidopsis; GFP-tagged cell component; Mechanical stimulation; Speed of plant response

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27180193     DOI: 10.1007/s00709-016-0984-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protoplasma        ISSN: 0033-183X            Impact factor:   3.356


  34 in total

Review 1.  Feeling green: mechanosensing in plants.

Authors:  Gabriele B Monshausen; Simon Gilroy
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 20.808

Review 2.  Plant mechanosensing and Ca2+ transport.

Authors:  Takamitsu Kurusu; Kazuyuki Kuchitsu; Masataka Nakano; Yoshitaka Nakayama; Hidetoshi Iida
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 18.313

3.  Optical measurements of invasive forces exerted by appressoria of a plant pathogenic fungus

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-09-17       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  In vivo assessment by Mach-Zehnder double-beam interferometry of the invasive force exerted by the Asian soybean rust fungus (Phakopsora pachyrhizi).

Authors:  Marco Loehrer; Jens Botterweck; Joachim Jahnke; Daniel M Mahlmann; Jochem Gaetgens; Marco Oldiges; Ralf Horbach; Holger Deising; Ulrich Schaffrath
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 10.151

5.  Local mechanical stimulation induces components of the pathogen defense response in parsley.

Authors:  S Gus-Mayer; B Naton; K Hahlbrock; E Schmelzer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-07-07       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The plant cell wall: a dynamic barrier against pathogen invasion.

Authors:  William Underwood
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 7.  Five Reasons to Consider Phytophthora infestans a Reemerging Pathogen.

Authors:  W E Fry; P R J Birch; H S Judelson; N J Grünwald; G Danies; K L Everts; A J Gevens; B K Gugino; D A Johnson; S B Johnson; M T McGrath; K L Myers; J B Ristaino; P D Roberts; G Secor; C D Smart
Journal:  Phytopathology       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 4.025

8.  Rapid and dynamic subcellular reorganization following mechanical stimulation of Arabidopsis epidermal cells mimics responses to fungal and oomycete attack.

Authors:  Adrienne R Hardham; Daigo Takemoto; Rosemary G White
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 4.215

9.  Perception of soft mechanical stress in Arabidopsis leaves activates disease resistance.

Authors:  Lehcen Benikhlef; Floriane L'Haridon; Eliane Abou-Mansour; Mario Serrano; Matteo Binda; Alex Costa; Silke Lehmann; Jean-Pierre Métraux
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 4.215

10.  Callose-mediated resistance to pathogenic intruders in plant defense-related papillae.

Authors:  Christian A Voigt
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 5.753

View more
  1 in total

1.  Mechanics of mystery.

Authors:  Peter Nick
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 3.356

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.