Literature DB >> 27180178

Efficacy and outcomes of continuous peritoneal dialysis versus daily intermittent hemodialysis in pediatric acute kidney injury.

Biswanath Basu1,2, Tapan Kumar Sinha Mahapatra3, Birendranath Roy3, Franz Schaefer4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) is associated with high patient morbidity and mortality. There is no consensus on the best RRT modality for pediatric AKI.
METHODS: The efficacy and safety of continuous peritoneal dialysis (cPD) and daily intermittent hemodialysis (dHD) were compared in 136 children aged 1 month to 16 years requiring RRT for AKI. Mortality, risk factors and causes of death, 1-month and 3-month renal recovery rates, and technique-related complications were assessed.
RESULTS: Uremia control and the rate of catheter-related complications were comparable in the groups. Thirty-day survival was 60.7 % (51 out of 84) with cPD and 36.5 % (19 out of 52) with dHD (p = 0.019). Although age <1 year, extended time lag from disease onset to RRT initiation, mechanical ventilation, and extended vasopressor dependence independently predicted death, adjusted mortality was higher with dHD relative to cPD (hazard ratio [HR] 1.75, 95%CI 1.18-2.84, p = 0.022). Almost all fatalities in the dHD group (94 %) occurred during or within an hour of a HD session. Renal function normalized in 27 % of survivors after 4 weeks and in 51 % after 3 months. The risk of permanent end-stage renal disease was increased in patients with an intrinsic renal cause of AKI (HR 2.72; 95 % CI 1.37-3.83; p = 0.029) and in those with delayed RRT initiation (HR 2.17; 95 % CI 123-2.93; p = 0.015), but did not differ between patients treated with dHD and cPD.
CONCLUSIONS: Favorable patient survival with cPD compared with dHD in children treated for AKI was evident in this study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Continuous peritoneal dialysis; Daily intermittent hemodialysis; Pediatric acute kidney injury

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27180178     DOI: 10.1007/s00467-016-3412-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol        ISSN: 0931-041X            Impact factor:   3.714


  15 in total

1.  The fourth report on the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure in children and adolescents.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration versus intermittent haemodialysis for acute renal failure in patients with multiple-organ dysfunction syndrome: a multicentre randomised trial.

Authors:  Christophe Vinsonneau; Christophe Camus; Alain Combes; Marie Alyette Costa de Beauregard; Kada Klouche; Thierry Boulain; Jean-Louis Pallot; Jean-Daniel Chiche; Pierre Taupin; Paul Landais; Jean-François Dhainaut
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-07-29       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Is peritoneal dialysis adequate for hypercatabolic acute renal failure in developing countries?

Authors:  Vipul Chimanlal Chitalia; Alan Fernandes Almeida; Harinakshi Rai; Mansi Bapat; Kinnari Vipul Chitalia; Vidya N Acharya; Ramesh Khanna
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 4.  Peritoneal dialysis for acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Brett Cullis; Mohamed Abdelraheem; Georgi Abrahams; Andre Balbi; Dinna N Cruz; Yaacov Frishberg; Vera Koch; Mignon McCulloch; Alp Numanoglu; Peter Nourse; Roberto Pecoits-Filho; Daniela Ponce; Bradley Warady; Karen Yeates; Fredric O Finkelstein
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.756

5.  PRISM III: an updated Pediatric Risk of Mortality score.

Authors:  M M Pollack; K M Patel; U E Ruttimann
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  The differential impact of risk factors on mortality in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Edward F Vonesh; Jon J Snyder; Robert N Foley; Allan J Collins
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 10.612

7.  A randomized controlled trial comparing intermittent with continuous dialysis in patients with ARF.

Authors:  Joshua J Augustine; Diane Sandy; Tracy H Seifert; Emil P Paganini
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 8.860

8.  Peritoneal dialysis in the pediatric intensive care unit setting: techniques, quantitations and outcomes.

Authors:  Melvin Bonilla-Félix
Journal:  Blood Purif       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 2.614

9.  High volume peritoneal dialysis vs daily hemodialysis: a randomized, controlled trial in patients with acute kidney injury.

Authors:  D P Gabriel; J T Caramori; L C Martim; P Barretti; A L Balbi
Journal:  Kidney Int Suppl       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 10.545

10.  New equations to estimate GFR in children with CKD.

Authors:  George J Schwartz; Alvaro Muñoz; Michael F Schneider; Robert H Mak; Frederick Kaskel; Bradley A Warady; Susan L Furth
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 10.121

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Peritoneal dialysis for acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Linfeng Liu; Ling Zhang; Guan J Liu; Ping Fu
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-12-04

Review 2.  Acute kidney injury in hospitalized children: consequences and outcomes.

Authors:  Amanda M Uber; Scott M Sutherland
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.714

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.