Literature DB >> 27180041

Analysis of loco-regional and distant recurrences in breast cancer after conservative surgery.

Mostafa Elsayed1, Mahmoud Alhussini2, Ahmed Basha3, A T Awad4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A number of patients treated conservatively for breast cancer will develop loco-regional and distant recurrences. Our aim was to determine how their occurrence may be linked to the evolution of the disease.
METHODS: We analyzed 238 women treated by conservative breast surgery and breast irradiation in a single institution. We evaluated the prognostic factors associated with loco-regional and distant recurrences and the prognostic value of local and regional recurrences on systemic progression.
RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 5 year (range 1-10), 16 (6.72%) patients in the breast conservative surgery (BCS) groups had loco-regional recurrence. For distant recurrence, 10 (4.2%) patients had experienced distant recurrence. Lympho-vascular invasion (HR 2.55; 95% CI, 076 to 8.49) and an extensive intraductal component (HR, 2.22; 95% CI, 0.69 to 7.15) and nodal status are risk factors for loco-regional recurrence (LRR) after breast conservative therapy (BCT). Tumor size, nodal status, high histologic grade, and breast cancer diagnosed at a young age (≤35 years) are correlated with higher distant recurrence rates after BCT.
CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors for LRR after BCS include lympho-vascular invasion, extensive inraductal component, and high nodal status, where as risk factors for distant recurrence include tumor size, nodal status, high histologic grade, and breast cancer diagnosed at a young age (≤35 years).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27180041      PMCID: PMC4868020          DOI: 10.1186/s12957-016-0881-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1477-7819            Impact factor:   2.754


Background

The surgical treatment of breast cancer changed substantially over the past decades. There was a shift from the orthodox treatment applying modified radical mastectomy (MRM) to breast conservative surgery (BCS) with radiotherapy [1-4]; BCS became the standard treatment for patients with early breast cancer. It provides a better quality of life for these patients and has the same overall survival if compared with mastectomy. However, it is associated with a higher incidence of loco-regional recurrence. This event may be a biomarker of disease aggressiveness as distant spread is a frequent accompaniment [5-11]. In this study, we collected data on 238 women treated by BCS and breast radiotherapy in order to identify and assess the risk factors that might predict the occurrence of loco-regional and distant recurrence after BCS aiming at selecting the suitable patients with high risk of local breast recurrence after BCS.

Methods

The data of operable patients, admitted and managed at the Surgical Oncology unit, Alexandria Faculty of Medicine, between 2005 and 2014, were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. The data of 238 patients were included; the following were recorded: An ethical approval statement was taken from all cases. Age at diagnosis: young patients are defined as younger than 35 years. Tumor characteristics: size, nodal status, presence of lympho-vascular invasion, amount of intraductal component, tumor grade, margin status, hormone receptor, and Her2 neu status. The follow-up period of the patients was registered. The occurrence of loco-regional recurrence or distant metastases during the follow-up period was recorded and considered as an end point for follow-up. Local recurrence is defined as recurrence in the original tumor bed (for BCS) or field of mastectomy. Regional recurrence refers to metastatic disease in the ipsilateral axilla or supraclavicular lymph nodes alone or in combination with the involvement of ipsilateral breast. Loco-regional recurrence-free survival of patients who underwent BCS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared among different categories using log-rank tests (univariable analysis of risk factors for loco-regional recurrence). Distal recurrence-free survival for both groups will be analyzed using the same test (univariable analysis of risk factors for distal recurrence). Associations with local recurrence after BCS were further evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model and summarized with hazard ratios 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Associations with distal recurrence after BCS were further evaluated using multivariable Cox regression model.

Results

Age of 35 years or younger represented 21 (8.8 %) patients in this study. Two hundred seventeen (91.2 %) patients had an age >35 year. Median age was 52 years (range 24–80) (Table 1).
Table 1

Age distribution

Age in yearsNo%
 <35218.8
 >3521791.2
Range24–80
 Mean ± SD52.0 ± 10.8
Age distribution Invasive ductal carcinoma represented 228 (95 %) of all patients which was considered the commonest histopathological type in this study. Grade II breast cancer patients were 182 (76.5 %) patients (Table 2).
Table 2

Histopathological types and grade

HistologyNo%
 IDC22895
 ILC104.2
Grade
 I83.4
 II18276.5
 III4820.2
Histopathological types and grade Of the included 238 patients, 146 (61.3 %) patients presented with a clinical tumor of 2 cm or less. One hundred twenty-one (50.8 %) patients had no pathological LNS. Stage I–II breast cancer patients were 191 (80.3 %) patients. Forty-seven (19.7 %) patients were stage III breast cancer and underwent BCS. Thirteen (27.6 %) patients had neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery (Tables 3 and 4).
Table 3

Tumour characteristics

Tumour characteristicsNo%
Size
 T114661.3
 T28636.1
 T362.5
LNs
 N012150.8
 N17732.4
 N22510.5
 N3156.3
Stage
 I7431.1
 II11749.2
 III4719.7
Table 4

Stage and procedure performed

StageNo & %Operation
I&II191 (43 %)BCS 191 (43 %)
III47 (21.3 %)BCS 47 (21.3 %) (13 patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy)
Tumour characteristics Stage and procedure performed Luminal A subtype represented 223 (93.7 %) of all patients. Triple negative subtype represented eight (3.3 %) of all patients. (Tables 5 and 6).
Table 5

Hormone receptors

Hormone receptorsNo%
Estrogen
 -ve125
 +2410.1
 ++12050.4
 +++8234.5
Progesterone
 -ve198
 +5924.8
 ++10443.7
 +++5623.5
Her2
 -ve20987.8
 +166.7
 ++10.4
 +++125
Table 6

Biological subtypes

TypeNo%
Luminal A22393.7
Luminal B41.7
Triple negative83.3
Her2 enriched31.3
Hormone receptors Biological subtypes Histopathological examination revealed that 47 (19.7 %) patients had excess intraductal component of the tumor, whereas 58 (24.4 %) had lympho-vascular invasion. Adjuvant radiotherapy was given to 238 (100 %) patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy was given to 201 (84.5 %) patients. Hormonal therapy was given to 215 (90.3 %) patients (Table 7).
Table 7

Adjuvant treatment

Adjuvant treatmentPatients
ChemotherapyNo: 37 (15.5 %)Yes: 201 (84.5 %)
RadiotherapyYes: all cases
HormonalNo: 23 (9.7 %)Yes: 215 (90.33 %)
Adjuvant treatment After a median follow-up of 5 years (range 1–10 years), 16 (6.72 %) patients had loco-regional recurrence (LRR), whereas 10 (4.2 %) patients had distant recurrence. Using the Kaplan-Meier method to determine the loco-regional recurrence-free survival and distant recurrence-free survival; it was found to be 92.7 and 96.4 %, respectively.

Prognostic factors for loco-regional recurrence

Analysis by the Cox proportional hazards model (Table 8), according to treatment actually given, demonstrated that relative risk of LRR for patients with lympho-vascular invasion compared with those without lympho-vascular invasion was 2.55 after BCS. The 5-year free survival of LRR after BCS was 89.1 % for patients with lymph-vascular invasion and 94 % for those without lympho-vascular invasion; (Fig. 1).
Table 8

Cox regression for loco-regional recurrence

Variables in the equation
Operation typeBSESig.HR95.0 % CI for HR
LowerUpper
BCTAge.003.024.9011.003.9571.052
T.244.680.7191.277.3374.839
LNs.900.691.1932.461.6359.541
Stage−.911.885.303.402.0712.277
Grade−1.322.603.028.267.082.870
IDC.799.596.1802.223.6917.151
Invasion.938.613.1262.555.7688.497
Postop_chemo−1.137.745.127.321.0741.382
Horm−1.858.658.005.156.043.567

HR > 1 is considered as a risk factor

Fig. 1

A Kaplan-Meier plot showing LRR-free survival by lympho-vascular invasion in BCS group

Cox regression for loco-regional recurrence HR > 1 is considered as a risk factor A Kaplan-Meier plot showing LRR-free survival by lympho-vascular invasion in BCS group Patients with high nodal status have a 2.46 times higher risk of developing LRR after BCS compared with those with low nodal status. The 5-year free survival of LRR after BCS was 75 % for N3 patients and 95.7 % for N1 patients (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

A Kaplan-Meier plot showing LRR-free survival by nodal status in BCS group

A Kaplan-Meier plot showing LRR-free survival by nodal status in BCS group The relative risk of LRR for patients with intraductal component was 2.22 times after BCS compared with those without intraductal component. The 5-year free survival of LRR after BCS was 92.1 % for patients with intraductal component and 92.8 % for patients without intraductal component (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

A Kaplan-Meier plot showing LRR-free survival by intraductal component in BCS group

A Kaplan-Meier plot showing LRR-free survival by intraductal component in BCS group The 5-year free survival of LRR after BCS was 94.4 % for patients who received hormonal therapy and 81.3 % for patients who did not receive hormonal therapy (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4

A Kaplan-Meier plot showing LRR-free survival by hormonal therapy in BCS group

A Kaplan-Meier plot showing LRR-free survival by hormonal therapy in BCS group

Prognostic factors for distant recurrence

According to the results of the multivariate Cox proportional hazards survival analysis, tumor size, nodal status, and histologic grade were all highly predictor factors of distant recurrence after BCS (Table 9).
Table 9

Cox regression for distal recurrence

Variables in the equation
Operation typeBSESig.HR95.0 % CI for HR
LowerUpper
BCTAge−.014.036.684.986.9191.057
T.897.785.2532.453.52711.417
LNs.656.635.3021.927.5556.692
Stage.065.947.9451.067.1676.825
Grade.392.744.5981.480.3446.356
IDC.132.776.8641.142.2505.221
Invasion−1.233.949.194.291.0451.870
Postop_XRT−.2931.214.809.746.0698.056
Horm−1.759.848.038.172.033.907

HR > 1 is considered as a risk factor

Cox regression for distal recurrence HR > 1 is considered as a risk factor In addition, young age is an independent predictor of distant recurrence after BCS. The 5-year free survival of distant recurrence after BCS was 90.9 % for patient aged 35 years and younger and 97 % for patients over 35 years (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5

A Kaplan-Meier plot showing distant recurrence-free survival by age in BCS group

A Kaplan-Meier plot showing distant recurrence-free survival by age in BCS group Hormonal therapy is also a protecting factor against distant recurrence after BCS with HR = 0.17; CI 95 % = 0.033–0.91. The 5-year survival of distant recurrence after BCS was 97.5 % for patients who received hormonal therapy and 85.7 % for those who did not receive hormonal therapy (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6

A Kaplan-Meier plot showing distant recurrence-free survival by hormonal therapy in BCS group

A Kaplan-Meier plot showing distant recurrence-free survival by hormonal therapy in BCS group

Discussion

The surgical treatment of breast cancer has been changed during the previous decades towards a less extensive surgery. Breast conservative surgery (BCS) is a model of this type of surgery which in properly selected patients provides local control of the disease. Based on the systemic disease concept of cancer breast, the removal of the primary does not obviate the risk of distant spread. Thus, our concern in the present study was to analyze the risk factors associated with loco-regional recurrence after BCS as local recurrence will obviate the purpose of breast conservation [12, 13]. The study revealed that the presence of an extensive intraductal component (EIC), lympho-vascular invasion and nodal status are associated with an increased risk of LRR after BCS. EIC is an established risk factor for LRR after breast conservative therapy (BCT) [5, 14–16]. Invasive breast carcinoma is accompanied by an extensive component of DCTS in 15–30 % of patients. DCIS grows along the ducts in the breast without invasion of the underlying tissue, which results in a non-palpable lesion difficult to remove with tumor-free margins. When EDCIs are completely removed with negative tumor margins, it loses its predicative value for LRR [5, 14–19]. In a pooled analysis of the EORTC 10801 and the DBCG 82 TM trials, lympho-vascular invasion causes a higher risk of LRR after BCT [20]. This result is also concordant with the observations made by Salim Alrahbi et al., Zahra MA Mohammed et al., and Bent Ejlertsen et al. [21-23]. In agreement with others, positive nodal status is a predictor for LRR in patients of BCT group [24]. Our study suggests a favorable effect of postoperative radiotherapy and adjuvant systemic treatment on LRR and distant metastases for BCS [12, 13, 20]. Today, the widespread use of adjuvant systemic therapy (chemotherapy and endocrine therapy) for both node-positive and node-negative breast cancer, coupled with improvements in the mammographic and pathological assessment of patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery, has resulted in decreased incidence of local failure [25, 26]. A study in Japan investigating the occurrence of ipsilateral breast recurrence, after long-term follow-up of patients with early breast cancer, after breast-conservative surgery, found it to be significantly associated with young age, positive surgical margin, and omission of radiation therapy [27]. Our study reveals that tumor size, nodal status, and high histologic grade are predictors for distant recurrence after BCS. Various studies have described an increased rate of distant metastases among those patients [14, 20, 28–33]. Patients 35 years of age or younger appeared to have an increased risk of distant disease. The increased risk was much more prominent after BCT. The adverse effect of young age on prognosis has been noted in several other studies and suggests that breast cancer in younger women is biologically more aggressive disease, possibly requiring more aggressive initial treatment. The question arises whether LRR might be a source of distant spread in some patients in the youngest age group. Unfortunately, numbers in the current study did not allow us to find the answer to this question [17, 34, 35].

Conclusions

Risk factors for loco-regional recurrence and distant metastases play an important role in the decision for the treatment of breast cancer. This decision-making can be optimized if patients at high risk for loco-regional recurrence can be identified. Lympho-vascular invasion, EIC, and high nodal status are risk factors for LRR after BCT. Tumor size, nodal status, high histologic grade, and breast cancer diagnosed at a young age (<35 years) are correlated with higher distant recurrence rates after BCT. Radiotherapy and hormonal therapy have a great role in decreasing the development of recurrence after BCS.
  35 in total

1.  Breast cancer outcomes: the crucial role of the breast surgeon in the era of personal genetics and systems biology.

Authors:  Dimitrios H Roukos
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Breast conserving therapy versus mastectomy for stage I-II breast cancer: 20 year follow-up of the EORTC 10801 phase 3 randomised trial.

Authors:  Saskia Litière; Gustavo Werutsky; Ian S Fentiman; Emiel Rutgers; Marie-Rose Christiaens; Erik Van Limbergen; Margreet H A Baaijens; Jan Bogaerts; Harry Bartelink
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Risk of recurrence of non-metastatic breast cancer in women under 40 years: a population-registry cancer study in a European country.

Authors:  David Martinez-Ramos; Javier Escrig; Ana Torrella; Jane S Hoashi; Miguel Alcalde; Jose L Salvador
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 2.431

4.  Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial.

Authors:  J A van Dongen; A C Voogd; I S Fentiman; C Legrand; R J Sylvester; D Tong; E van der Schueren; P A Helle; K van Zijl; H Bartelink
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-07-19       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after breast-conserving treatment for early breast cancer: risk factors and impact on distant metastases.

Authors:  Yoshifumi Komoike; Futoshi Akiyama; Yuichi Iino; Tadashi Ikeda; Sadako Akashi-Tanaka; Shozo Ohsumi; Mikihiro Kusama; Muneaki Sano; Eisei Shin; Kimito Suemasu; Hiroshi Sonoo; Tetsuya Taguchi; Tsunehiro Nishi; Reiki Nishimura; Shunsuke Haga; Keiichi Mise; Takayuki Kinoshita; Shigeru Murakami; Masataka Yoshimoto; Hideaki Tsukuma; Hideo Inaji
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Nomogram to predict ipsilateral breast relapse based on pathology review from the EORTC 22881-10882 boost versus no boost trial.

Authors:  Erik van Werkhoven; Guus Hart; Harm van Tinteren; Paula Elkhuizen; Laurence Collette; Philip Poortmans; Harry Bartelink
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 6.280

7.  Angiogenesis as a predictor of long-term survival for 377 Japanese patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  T Kato; S Kameoka; T Kimura; N Soga; Y Abe; T Nishikawa; M Kobayashi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Treatment results and prognostic factors of early breast cancer treated with a breast conserving operation and radiotherapy.

Authors:  Kyoung Ju Kim; Seung Jae Huh; Jung-Hyun Yang; Won Park; Seok Jin Nam; Jeong Han Kim; Jee Hyun Lee; Sung Soo Kang; Jeong Eun Lee; Min Kyu Kang; Young Je Park; Hee Rim Nam
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  Population-based study of peritumoral lymphovascular invasion and outcome among patients with operable breast cancer.

Authors:  Bent Ejlertsen; Maj-Britt Jensen; Fritz Rank; Birgitte B Rasmussen; Peer Christiansen; Niels Kroman; Marianne E Kvistgaard; Marie Overgaard; Dorte B Toftdahl; Henning T Mouridsen
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  The relationship between lymphovascular invasion and angiogenesis, hormone receptors, cell proliferation and survival in patients with primary operable invasive ductal breast cancer.

Authors:  Donald C McMillan; Joanne Edwards; Elizabeth Mallon; Julie C Doughty; Clare Orange; James J Going; Zahra Ma Mohammed
Journal:  BMC Clin Pathol       Date:  2013-11-25
View more
  5 in total

1.  Incidence and Predictors of Recurrence among Breast Cancer Patients in Black Lion Specialized Hospital Adult Oncology Unit, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Retrospective Follow-up Study with Survival Analysis.

Authors:  Wondimeneh Shibabaw Shiferaw; Yared Asmare Aynalem; Tadesse Yirga Akalu; Tefera Mulugeta Demelew
Journal:  J Cancer Prev       Date:  2020-06-30

2.  (-)-Oleocanthal Prevents Breast Cancer Locoregional Recurrence After Primary Tumor Surgical Excision and Neoadjuvant Targeted Therapy in Orthotopic Nude Mouse Models.

Authors:  Abu Bakar Siddique; Nehad M Ayoub; Afsana Tajmim; Sharon A Meyer; Ronald A Hill; Khalid A El Sayed
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 6.639

3.  Diverse Distribution and Gene Expression on the 21-Gene Recurrence Assay in Breast Cancer Patients with Locoregional Recurrence Versus Distant Metastasis.

Authors:  Yujie Lu; Yiwei Tong; Jiahui Huang; Lin Lin; Jiayi Wu; Xiaochun Fei; Xiaosong Chen; Kunwei Shen
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 3.989

4.  Downregulated RRS1 inhibits invasion and metastasis of BT549 through RPL11‑c‑Myc‑SNAIL axis.

Authors:  Runze Wang; Cuixiu Peng; Junying Song; Yanan Hua; Qinglan Wu; Lin Deng; Yi Cao; Jinyu Zhang; Li Zhang; Li Wu; Lin Hou
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 5.650

5.  Tumor cell expression of CD163 is associated to postoperative radiotherapy and poor prognosis in patients with breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery.

Authors:  Stina Garvin; Husam Oda; Lars-Gunnar Arnesson; Annelie Lindström; Ivan Shabo
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 4.553

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.