Soomin Ahn1,2, Mineui Hong3, Michael Van Vrancken4, You Jeong Lyou2, Seung Tae Kim5, Se Hoon Park5, Won Ki Kang5, Young Suk Park5, Sin-Ho Jung6, Minah Woo6, Jeeyun Lee7, Kyoung-Mee Kim8,9. 1. Department of Pathology and Translational Genomics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 135-710, Korea. 2. Center of Companion Diagnostics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. 3. Department of Pathology, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. 4. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA. 5. Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 135-710, Korea. 6. Biostatistics and Clinical Epidemiology Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. 7. Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 135-710, Korea. jyunlee@skku.edu. 8. Department of Pathology and Translational Genomics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 135-710, Korea. kkmkys@skku.edu. 9. Center of Companion Diagnostics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. kkmkys@skku.edu.
Abstract
AIM: Screening amplified genes for targeted therapy with high-throughput technology is very important. The NanoString nCounter system allows multiplexed digital quantification of target molecules through the use of color-coded barcodes with the great advantage that formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue can be utilized. METHODS: We tested nCounter custom copy number variation (CNV) panels in 220 gastric cancer samples and evaluated the utility of this method as a screening tool for the detection of CNV using HER2. For the validation of results, we compared the nCounter results with immunohistochemistry (IHC), and we further performed in situ hybridization (ISH) in discrepant cases. RESULTS: The average HER2 gene copy numbers (CNs) by nCounter were 17.25, 2.0 and 2.61 for the HER2 IHC positive (3+), equivocal (2+), and negative cases, respectively. Out of the 16 IHC 3+ cases, 13 (81.3 %) were reported as HER2 CN gain (≥4). Gastric cancers with homogeneous HER2 overexpression or high tumor purity showed HER2 CN ≥10. Among the 192 cases with HER2 IHC negative and without HER2 gene amplification, 29 showed a HER2 CN ≥4 with the nCounter assay. The nCounter assay had a concordance rate of 83.4 % (kappa value, 0.35), a sensitivity of 66.7 %, a specificity of 85.2 %, a negative predictive value of 96 %, and a positive predictive value of 32.6 % compared with HER2 IHC/ISH results. Fresh frozen (FF) samples revealed a higher concordance rate (91.5 %, kappa value, 0.59) than FFPE samples (78.5 %, kappa value 0.27) and showed a high specificity (97.2 %). CONCLUSION: The nCounter CNV assay is a reliable and practical method to detect high CN variations. Given the intra-tumoral HER2 heterogeneity and normal cell contamination, additional IHC and/or FISH is necessary and needs caution in interpretation, especially in FFPE tissue samples.
AIM: Screening amplified genes for targeted therapy with high-throughput technology is very important. The NanoString nCounter system allows multiplexed digital quantification of target molecules through the use of color-coded barcodes with the great advantage that formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue can be utilized. METHODS: We tested nCounter custom copy number variation (CNV) panels in 220 gastric cancer samples and evaluated the utility of this method as a screening tool for the detection of CNV using HER2. For the validation of results, we compared the nCounter results with immunohistochemistry (IHC), and we further performed in situ hybridization (ISH) in discrepant cases. RESULTS: The average HER2 gene copy numbers (CNs) by nCounter were 17.25, 2.0 and 2.61 for the HER2 IHC positive (3+), equivocal (2+), and negative cases, respectively. Out of the 16 IHC 3+ cases, 13 (81.3 %) were reported as HER2 CN gain (≥4). Gastric cancers with homogeneous HER2 overexpression or high tumor purity showed HER2 CN ≥10. Among the 192 cases with HER2 IHC negative and without HER2 gene amplification, 29 showed a HER2 CN ≥4 with the nCounter assay. The nCounter assay had a concordance rate of 83.4 % (kappa value, 0.35), a sensitivity of 66.7 %, a specificity of 85.2 %, a negative predictive value of 96 %, and a positive predictive value of 32.6 % compared with HER2 IHC/ISH results. Fresh frozen (FF) samples revealed a higher concordance rate (91.5 %, kappa value, 0.59) than FFPE samples (78.5 %, kappa value 0.27) and showed a high specificity (97.2 %). CONCLUSION: The nCounter CNV assay is a reliable and practical method to detect high CN variations. Given the intra-tumoral HER2 heterogeneity and normal cell contamination, additional IHC and/or FISH is necessary and needs caution in interpretation, especially in FFPE tissue samples.
Authors: Gary K Geiss; Roger E Bumgarner; Brian Birditt; Timothy Dahl; Naeem Dowidar; Dwayne L Dunaway; H Perry Fell; Sean Ferree; Renee D George; Tammy Grogan; Jeffrey J James; Malini Maysuria; Jeffrey D Mitton; Paola Oliveri; Jennifer L Osborn; Tao Peng; Amber L Ratcliffe; Philippa J Webster; Eric H Davidson; Leroy Hood; Krassen Dimitrov Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2008-02-17 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Charles L Vogel; Melody A Cobleigh; Debu Tripathy; John C Gutheil; Lyndsay N Harris; Louis Fehrenbacher; Dennis J Slamon; Maureen Murphy; William F Novotny; Michael Burchmore; Steven Shak; Stanford J Stewart; Michael Press Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-02-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jochen K Lennerz; Eunice L Kwak; Allison Ackerman; Michael Michael; Stephen B Fox; Kristin Bergethon; Gregory Y Lauwers; James G Christensen; Keith D Wilner; Daniel A Haber; Ravi Salgia; Yung-Jue Bang; Jeffrey W Clark; Benjamin J Solomon; A John Iafrate Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-10-31 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Christina I Selinger; Toni-Maree Rogers; Prudence A Russell; Sandra O'Toole; Poyee Yip; Gavin M Wright; Zoe Wainer; Lisa G Horvath; Michael Boyer; Brian McCaughan; Maija Rj Kohonen-Corish; Stephen Fox; Wendy A Cooper; Benjamin Solomon Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2013-06-07 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Ilari Scheinin; Daoud Sie; Henrik Bengtsson; Mark A van de Wiel; Adam B Olshen; Hinke F van Thuijl; Hendrik F van Essen; Paul P Eijk; François Rustenburg; Gerrit A Meijer; Jaap C Reijneveld; Pieter Wesseling; Daniel Pinkel; Donna G Albertson; Bauke Ylstra Journal: Genome Res Date: 2014-09-18 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Matthias Christgen; Jana L van Luttikhuizen; Mieke Raap; Peter Braubach; Lars Schmidt; Danny Jonigk; Friedrich Feuerhake; Ulrich Lehmann; Brigitte Schlegelberger; Hans H Kreipe; Doris Steinemann Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2016-12-13