| Literature DB >> 27179510 |
Koen Ameloot1, Cornelia Genbrugge2,3, Ingrid Meex2,3, Ward Eertmans2,3, Frank Jans2,3, Cathy De Deyne2,3, Joseph Dens4,3, Wilfried Mullens4,3, Bert Ferdinande4, Matthias Dupont4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Post-cardiac arrest (CA) patients are at risk of secondary ischemic damage in the case of suboptimal brain oxygenation during an ICU stay. We hypothesized that elevated central venous pressures (CVP) would impair cerebral perfusion and oxygenation (venous cerebral congestion). The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between CVP, cerebral tissue oxygen saturation (SctO2) as assessed with near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and outcome in post-CA patients.Entities:
Keywords: Central venous pressure; Cerebral perfusion; Outcome; Post-cardiac arrest
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27179510 PMCID: PMC4868016 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-016-1297-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Crit Care ISSN: 1364-8535 Impact factor: 9.097
Fig. 1The mean cerebral tissue oxygen saturation (SctO2) is shown per mmHg central venous pressure (a) and the mean SctO2 is shown per mmHg mean arterial pressure-central venous pressure (MAP-CVP) (b)
Fig. 2The mean cerebral tissue oxygen saturation (SctO2) per mmHg central venous pressure (CVP) after stratification of the data points according to the simultaneously obtained mean arterial pressure (MAP) (60–70 mmHg, 70–80 mmHg, 80–90 mmHg, 90–100 mmHg) (a). The mean SctO2 per mmHg CVP is shown after stratification of the data points according to the simultaneously obtained cardiac output (2.5–5 L/min, 5–7.5 L/min, >7.5 L/min) (b)
Fig. 3Trend analysis. The difference in central venous pressure (ΔCVP) and in cerebral tissue oxygen saturation (ΔSctO ) were calculated during 1-h time intervals during the 24-h study period. The mean ΔSctO2 is shown per mmHg mean ΔCVP
Odds ratios (OR) for survival with a good neurological outcome at 180 days (cerebral performance category 1–2) per percentage of time above each central venous pressure (CVP)
| Percentage of time at different CVP values | OR | 95 % CI |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| CVP >1 mmHg | 0.19 | 0.02–2.30 | 0.19 |
| CVP >2 mmHg | 0.46 | 0.17–1.23 | 0.12 |
| CVP >3 mmHg | 0.69 | 0.47–1.01 | 0.05 |
| CVP >4 mmHg | 0.90 | 0.80–1.02 | 0.10 |
| CVP >5 mmHg | 0.96 | 0.92–1.00 | 0.04 |
| CVP >6 mmHg | 0.97 | 0.95–1.00 | 0.07 |
| CVP >7 mmHg | 0.98 | 0.97–1.01 | 0.19 |
| CVP >8 mmHg | 0.99 | 0.97–1.01 | 0.34 |
| CVP >9 mmHg | 0.99 | 0.98–1.01 | 0.45 |
| CVP >10 mmHg | 0.99 | 0.97–1.01 | 0.52 |
| CVP > 15 mmHg | 0.99 | 0.97–1.02 | 0.68 |
| CVP > 20 mmHg | 0.97 | 0.87–1.07 | 0.48 |
Two separate multivariate models constructed using backward multivariate logistic regression
| Model | Step 1 | Final step | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR ( | OR | 95 % CI |
| |
| Model 1: cardiac arrest variables | ||||
| Age | 0.99 (0.84) | |||
| Bystander CPR, yes/no | 3.75 (0.27) | |||
| Shockable rhythm, yes/no | 8.93 (0.02) | 11.36 | 1.8–71.5 | 0.01 |
| Time to ROSC | 0.98 (0.63) | |||
| Percentage time CVP >5 mmHg | 0.94 (0.03) | 0.94 | 0.89–0.99 | 0.02 |
| Model 2: hemodynamic variables | ||||
| Percentage time MAP <65 mmHg | 0.96 (0.03) | 0.96 | 0.93–0.99 | 0.04 |
| Ejection fraction, % | 0.99 (0.56) | |||
| Percentage time CVP >5 mmHg | 0.95 (0.03) | 0.95 | 0.90–0.99 | 0.03 |
In the first model, arrest variables were included (age, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) <10 minutes, shockable rhythm, time to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), and percentage time central venous pressure (CVP) >5 mmHg) and in the second model, hemodynamic variables were included (mean, mean arterial pressure (MAP)/24 h, ejection fraction, mean CO/24 h, percentage time CVP >5 mmHg). Odds ratios (OR) for survival with a good neurological outcome at 180 days (cerebral performance category 1–2) are shown