Literature DB >> 27179385

Naegele's rule revisited.

Christine Anna Lieselotte Loytved1, Valerie Fleming2.   

Abstract

Recent literature suggests that Franz Carl Naegele's (1778-1851) rule for estimating the date of delivery has been misinterpreted, resulting in this being brought forward by five days. Baskett and Nagele's work underpinning this argument has become widely accepted and quoted in obstetrical and midwifery textbooks. However, our re-examination of Naegele's original statements does not support the recent findings. On the contrary, the original textbooks of Naegele clearly advise taking the first day of menstruation for the calculation of the date of delivery.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  History; Naegele; Pregnancy; Rule

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27179385     DOI: 10.1016/j.srhc.2016.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Reprod Healthc        ISSN: 1877-5756


  2 in total

1.  Theorizing Time in Abortion Law and Human Rights.

Authors:  Joanna N Erdman
Journal:  Health Hum Rights       Date:  2017-06

2.  Handheld transabdominal ultrasound, after limited training, may confirm first trimester viable intrauterine pregnancy: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Judith Krossøy Pedersen; Cecilie Sira; Jone Trovik
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 2.581

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.