Literature DB >> 27179331

Artificial light at night disrupts sleep in female great tits (Parus major) during the nestling period, and is followed by a sleep rebound.

Thomas Raap1, Rianne Pinxten2, Marcel Eens3.   

Abstract

Artificial light at night has been linked to a wide variety of physiological and behavioural consequences in humans and animals. Given that little is known about the impact of light pollution on sleep in wild animals, we tested how experimentally elevated light levels affected sleep behaviour of female songbirds rearing 10 day old chicks. Using a within-subject design, individual sleep behaviour was observed over three consecutive nights in great tits (Parus major), with females sleeping in a natural dark situation on the first and third night, whereas on the second night they were exposed to a light-emitting diode (1.6 lux). Artificial light in the nest box dramatically and significantly affected sleep behaviour, causing females to fall asleep later (95 min; while entry time was unaffected), wake up earlier (74 min) and sleep less (56%). Females spent a greater proportion of the night awake and the frequency of their sleep bouts decreased, while the length of their sleep bouts remained equal. Artificial light also increased begging of chicks at night, which may have contributed to the sleep disruption in females or vice versa. The night following the light treatment, females slept 25% more compared to the first night, which was mainly achieved by increasing the frequency of sleep bouts. Although there was a consistent pattern in how artificial light affected sleep, there was also large among-individual variation in how strongly females were affected. When comparing current results with a similar experiment during winter, our results highlight differences in effects between seasons and underscore the importance of studying light pollution during different seasons. Our study shows that light pollution may have a significant impact on sleep behaviour in free-living animals during the reproductive season, which may provide a potential mechanism by which artificial light affects fitness.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial lighting at night; Begging; Breeding season; Light pollution; Sleep rebound; Urbanization

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27179331     DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.04.100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  15 in total

Review 1.  Sleep research goes wild: new methods and approaches to investigate the ecology, evolution and functions of sleep.

Authors:  Niels C Rattenborg; Horacio O de la Iglesia; Bart Kempenaers; John A Lesku; Peter Meerlo; Madeleine F Scriba
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Exposure to Artificial Light at Night and the Consequences for Flora, Fauna, and Ecosystems.

Authors:  Jack Falcón; Alicia Torriglia; Dina Attia; Françoise Viénot; Claude Gronfier; Francine Behar-Cohen; Christophe Martinsons; David Hicks
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 5.152

3.  Outdoor Artificial Nighttime Light and Use of Hypnotic Medications in Older Adults: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jin-Young Min; Kyoung-Bok Min
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 4.062

4.  Long-term exposure to artificial light at night in the wild decreases survival and growth of a coral reef fish.

Authors:  Jules Schligler; Daphne Cortese; Ricardo Beldade; Stephen E Swearer; Suzanne C Mills
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Ambient anthropogenic noise but not light is associated with the ecophysiology of free-living songbird nestlings.

Authors:  Thomas Raap; Rianne Pinxten; Giulia Casasole; Nina Dehnhard; Marcel Eens
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The importance of illumination in nest site choice and nest characteristics of cavity nesting birds.

Authors:  Paweł Podkowa; Adrian Surmacki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Experimental illumination of a forest: no effects of lights of different colours on the onset of the dawn chorus in songbirds.

Authors:  Arnaud Da Silva; Maaike de Jong; Roy H A van Grunsven; Marcel E Visser; Bart Kempenaers; Kamiel Spoelstra
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  Urban warming and artificial light alter dormancy in the flesh fly.

Authors:  Ayumu Mukai; Koki Yamaguchi; Shin G Goto
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 2.963

9.  Artificial light at night affects body mass but not oxidative status in free-living nestling songbirds: an experimental study.

Authors:  Thomas Raap; Giulia Casasole; David Costantini; Hamada AbdElgawad; Han Asard; Rianne Pinxten; Marcel Eens
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Artificial light at night causes an unexpected increase in oxalate in developing male songbirds.

Authors:  Thomas Raap; Rianne Pinxten; Marcel Eens
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 3.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.