Literature DB >> 27179309

Language and memory for object location.

Harmen B Gudde1, Kenny R Coventry2, Paul E Engelhardt3.   

Abstract

In three experiments, we investigated the influence of two types of language on memory for object location: demonstratives (this, that) and possessives (my, your). Participants first read instructions containing demonstratives/possessives to place objects at different locations, and then had to recall those object locations (following object removal). Experiments 1 and 2 tested contrasting predictions of two possible accounts of language on object location memory: the Expectation Model (Coventry, Griffiths, & Hamilton, 2014) and the congruence account (Bonfiglioli, Finocchiaro, Gesierich, Rositani, & Vescovi, 2009). In Experiment 3, the role of attention allocation as a possible mechanism was investigated. Results across all three experiments show striking effects of language on object location memory, with the pattern of data supporting the Expectation Model. In this model, the expected location cued by language and the actual location are concatenated leading to (mis)memory for object location, consistent with models of predictive coding (Bar, 2009; Friston, 2003).
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Memory; Object location; Peripersonal/extrapersonal space; Possessives; Spatial demonstratives

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27179309     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.04.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  11 in total

1.  Grammar, Gender and Demonstratives in Lateralized Imagery for Sentences.

Authors:  Mikkel Wallentin; Roberta Rocca; Sofia Stroustrup
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2019-08

2.  Spatial text processing: are estimates of time and distance influenced by the age of characters and readers?

Authors:  Francesca Pazzaglia; Tina Iachini; Chiara Meneghetti
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-09-23

3.  This shoe, that tiger: Semantic properties reflecting manual affordances of the referent modulate demonstrative use.

Authors:  Roberta Rocca; Kristian Tylén; Mikkel Wallentin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Eye-tracking for assessing medical image interpretation: A pilot feasibility study comparing novice vs expert cardiologists.

Authors:  Tad T Brunyé; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2019-04

5.  Space Trumps Time When Talking About Objects.

Authors:  Debra Griffiths; Andre Bester; Kenny R Coventry
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-03

6.  Effects of Scale on Multimodal Deixis: Evidence From Quiahije Chatino.

Authors:  Kate Mesh; Emiliana Cruz; Joost van de Weijer; Niclas Burenhult; Marianne Gullberg
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-01-12

Review 7.  Demonstratives in Spatial Language and Social Interaction: An Interdisciplinary Review.

Authors:  Holger Diessel; Kenny R Coventry
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-11-25

Review 8.  A conceptual framework for the study of demonstrative reference.

Authors:  David Peeters; Emiel Krahmer; Alfons Maes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-10-09

9.  The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition.

Authors:  Harmen B Gudde; Debra Griffiths; Kenny R Coventry
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 1.355

10.  This is for you: Social modulations of proximal vs. distal space in collaborative interaction.

Authors:  Roberta Rocca; Mikkel Wallentin; Cordula Vesper; Kristian Tylén
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.