Literature DB >> 27179146

The doctor-patient relationship as a toolkit for uncertain clinical decisions.

Lauren Diamond-Brown1.   

Abstract

Medical uncertainty is a well-recognized problem in healthcare, yet how doctors make decisions in the face of uncertainty remains to be understood. This article draws on interdisciplinary literature on uncertainty and physician decision-making to examine a specific physician response to uncertainty: using the doctor-patient relationship as a toolkit. Additionally, I ask what happens to this process when the doctor-patient relationship becomes fragmented. I answer these questions by examining obstetrician-gynecologists' narratives regarding how they make decisions when faced with uncertainty in childbirth. Between 2013 and 2014, I performed 21 semi-structured interviews with obstetricians in the United States. Obstetricians were selected to maximize variation in relevant physician, hospital, and practice characteristics. I began with grounded theory and moved to analytical coding of themes in relation to relevant literature. My analysis renders it evident that some physicians use the doctor-patient relationship as a toolkit for dealing with uncertainty. I analyze how this process varies for physicians in different models of care by comparing doctors' experiences in models with continuous versus fragmented doctor-patient relationships. My key findings are that obstetricians in both models appealed to the ideal of patient-centered decision-making to cope with uncertain decisions, but in practice physicians in fragmented care faced a number of challenges to using the doctor-patient relationship as a toolkit for decision-making. These challenges led to additional uncertainties and in some cases to poor outcomes for doctors and/or patients; they also raised concerns about the reproduction of inequality. Thus organization of care delivery mitigates the efficacy of doctors' use of the doctor-patient relationship toolkit for uncertain decisions. These findings have implications for theorizing about decision-making under conditions of medical uncertainty, for understanding how the doctor-patient relationship and model of care affect physician decision-making, and for forming policy on the optimal structure of medical work.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decision-making; Doctor-patient relationship; Fragmented care; Interactive knowledge; Organization of care delivery; Patient-centered care; USA; Uncertainty

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27179146     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  9 in total

1.  "A Résumé for the Baby": Biosocial Precarity and Care of Substance-Using, Pregnant Women in San Francisco.

Authors:  Ashish Premkumar; Jennifer Kerns; Megan J Huchko
Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry       Date:  2020-03

2.  Status, causes and consequences of physicians' self-perceived professional reputation damage in China: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Bei Liu; Xiaohe Wang; Tao Sun; Jinghui Wang; Shu'e Zhang; Yu Shi
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Knowledge of and Compliance With Guidelines in the Management of Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Survey of Chinese Urologists.

Authors:  Dan-Qi Wang; Qiao Huang; Xing Huang; Ying-Hui Jin; Yun-Yun Wang; Yue-Xian Shi; Si-Yu Yan; Lu Yang; Bing-Hui Li; Tong-Zu Liu; Xian-Tao Zeng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Between Multiple Identities and Values: Professionals' Identity Conflicts in Ethically Charged Situations.

Authors:  Lara Carminati; YingFei Gao Héliot
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-20

5.  Provider Bias in prescribing opioid analgesics: a study of electronic medical Records at a Hospital Emergency Department.

Authors:  Lisa A Keister; Chad Stecher; Brian Aronson; William McConnell; Joshua Hustedt; James W Moody
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Conveying Equipoise during Recruitment for Clinical Trials: Qualitative Synthesis of Clinicians' Practices across Six Randomised Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Leila Rooshenas; Daisy Elliott; Julia Wade; Marcus Jepson; Sangeetha Paramasivan; Sean Strong; Caroline Wilson; David Beard; Jane M Blazeby; Alison Birtle; Alison Halliday; Chris A Rogers; Rob Stein; Jenny L Donovan
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 11.069

7.  Adapting the Quality Maternal and Newborn Care (QMNC) Framework to evaluate models of antenatal care: A pilot study.

Authors:  Andrew Symon; Alison McFadden; Marianne White; Katrina Fraser; Allison Cummins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Knowing what the patient wants: a hospital ethnography studying physician culture in shared decision making in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Laura Spinnewijn; Johanna Aarts; Sabine Verschuur; Didi Braat; Trudie Gerrits; Fedde Scheele
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  A qualitative study of the views of healthcare professionals on providing vaccines information to patients.

Authors:  Ruth Loftus; Laura J Sahm; Aoife Fleming
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2021-06-21
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.