Literature DB >> 27179056

High Failure Rate of a Decellularized Osteochondral Allograft for the Treatment of Cartilage Lesions.

Jack Farr1, Guilherme C Gracitelli2, Nehal Shah3, Eric Y Chang4, Andreas H Gomoll3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Widespread adoption of fresh allograft transplantation remains limited, predominantly by supply issues. To overcome these limitations, a preshaped, cylindrical sterilized and decellularized osteochondral allograft (SDOCA) implant was recently introduced as a clinical treatment option.
PURPOSE: To evaluate functional outcomes and graft survivorship among patients treated with the SDOCA implant for knee cartilage injuries. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS: An institutional review board-approved database was used to identify a series of patients with prospectively collected data who had been treated with the SDOCA implant. The surgeries were performed at 2 centers by 2 surgeons. Patient-reported outcomes, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and the number and type of reoperations were assessed. Failure was defined as structural damage of the graft diagnosed by arthroscopy or MRI, and any reoperation resulting in removal of the allograft. Patients were evaluated pre- and postoperatively using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Marx Sports Activity Scale. MRI was assessed preoperatively and postoperatively.
RESULTS: There were 32 patients with a mean age (±SD) of 35.1 ± 10.6 years; 59% were male. Twenty-three (72%) knees had previous surgery. The mean defect area (±SD) was 2.9 ± 2.0 cm(2), and the mean allograft size was 13.18 ± 2.3 mm (6 grafts ≤9 mm and 59 grafts ≥11 mm). The median number of allografts per knee was 2 (range, 1-5 grafts). Twenty-three of the 32 knees (72%) were considered failures by the definition detailed above. Of these, 14 knees (43%) had further surgery after the index procedure. Implant survivorship was 19.6% at 2 years. The mean follow-up duration was 1.29 years (range, 0.11-2.8 years). KOOS pain, activities of daily living (ADL), sports and recreation (sport/rec), and knee-related quality of life improved significantly from the preoperative visit to latest follow-up. Age was significantly predictive of failure, with a hazard ratio of 1.68 per 1 SD older (95% CI, 1.05-2.68; P = .030). The MOCART (magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue) feature effusion was the only score to correlate with KOOS (symptoms, pain, ADL, sport/rec).
CONCLUSION: The SDOCA implant demonstrated a 72% failure rate within the first 2 years of implantation at these 2 institutions.
© 2016 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  cartilage; osteochondral allograft; osteochondral defect; osteochondral transplantation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27179056     DOI: 10.1177/0363546516645086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  19 in total

1.  Yet another key learning point in the quest universal cartilage repair and restoration.

Authors:  William D Murrell
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-05

2.  Effects of antigen removal on a porcine osteochondral xenograft for articular cartilage repair.

Authors:  Steve Elder; Hudson Chenault; Paul Gloth; Katie Webb; Ruth Recinos; Emily Wright; Dalton Moran; James Butler; Abdolsamad Borazjani; Avery Cooley
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 4.396

Review 3.  Functionality of decellularized matrix in cartilage regeneration: A comparison of tissue versus cell sources.

Authors:  Yu Sun; Lianqi Yan; Song Chen; Ming Pei
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 8.947

4.  Biologic Joint Restoration: A Translational Research Success Story.

Authors:  James L Cook; James P Stannard; Aaron M Stoker; Kylee Rucinski; Brett D Crist; Cristi R Cook; Cory Crecelius; Matthew J Smith; Renee Stucky
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr

5.  Assessment of Outcomes After Multisurface Osteochondral Allograft Transplantations in the Knee.

Authors:  James L Cook; Kylee Rucinski; Cory Crecelius; Blake Fenkell; James P Stannard
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-06-14

6.  Wide Variation in Methodology in Level I and II Studies on Cartilage Repair: A Systematic Review of Available Clinical Trials Comparing Patient Demographics, Treatment Means, and Outcomes Reporting.

Authors:  Bryan Michael Saltzman; Michael L Redondo; Adam Beer; Eric J Cotter; Rachel M Frank; Adam B Yanke; Brian J Cole
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Accurate Reporting of Concomitant Procedures Is Highly Variable in Studies Investigating Knee Cartilage Restoration.

Authors:  William L Sheppard; Betina B Hinckel; Armin Arshi; Seth L Sherman; Kristofer J Jones
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 8.  Concise Review: Biomimetic Functionalization of Biomaterials to Stimulate the Endogenous Healing Process of Cartilage and Bone Tissue.

Authors:  Francesca Taraballi; Guillermo Bauza; Patrick McCulloch; Josh Harris; Ennio Tasciotti
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 6.940

Review 9.  How to Manage a Failed Cartilage Repair: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Donato Rosa; Sigismondo Luca Di Donato; Giovanni Balato; Alessio D'Addona; Francesco Smeraglia; Gaetano Correra; Gianni Di Vico
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2017-07-28

10.  Suitability of EGCG as a Means of Stabilizing a Porcine Osteochondral Xenograft.

Authors:  Steven Elder; John Clune; Jaylyn Walker; Paul Gloth
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2017-09-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.