Literature DB >> 27178405

Factors affecting optimal linear endovenous energy density for endovenous laser ablation in incompetent lower limb truncal veins - A review of the clinical evidence.

Christine A Cowpland1, Amy L Cleese1, Mark S Whiteley1,2.   

Abstract

Objectives The objective is to identify the factors that affect the optimal linear endovenous energy density (LEED) to ablate incompetent truncal veins. Methods We performed a literature review of clinical studies, which reported truncal vein ablation rates and LEED. A PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) flow diagram documents the search strategy. We analysed 13 clinical papers which fulfilled the criteria to be able to compare results of great saphenous vein occlusion as defined by venous duplex ultrasound, with the LEED used in the treatment. Results Evidence suggests that the optimal LEED for endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein is >80 J/cm and <100 J/cm in terms of optimal closure rates with minimal side-effects and complications. Longer wavelengths targeting water might have a lower optimal LEED. A LEED <60 J/cm has reduced efficacy regardless of wavelength. The optimal LEED may vary with vein diameter and may be reduced by using specially shaped fibre tips. Laser delivery technique and type as well as the duration time of energy delivery appear to play a role in determining LEED. Conclusion The optimal LEED to ablate an incompetent great saphenous vein appears to be >80 J/cm and <95 J/cm based on current evidence for shorter wavelength lasers. There is evidence that longer wavelength lasers may be effective at LEEDs of <85 J/cm.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Linear endovenous energy density; endovenous energy density; endovenous fluence equivalence; endovenous laser ablation; endovenous thermoablation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27178405     DOI: 10.1177/0268355516648067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phlebology        ISSN: 0268-3555            Impact factor:   1.740


  5 in total

1.  Effect of spatial light distribution on the thermal response of vascular tissue.

Authors:  Van Gia Truong; Van Nam Tran; Jieun Hwang; Hyun Wook Kang
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  No significant difference between 1940 and 1470 nm in endovenous laser ablation using an in vitro porcine liver model.

Authors:  Mark S Whiteley; Amy C Cross; Victoria C Whiteley
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2021-10-23       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 3.  S2k guidelines: diagnosis and treatment of varicose veins.

Authors:  F Pannier; T Noppeney; J Alm; F X Breu; G Bruning; I Flessenkämper; H Gerlach; K Hartmann; B Kahle; H Kluess; E Mendoza; D Mühlberger; A Mumme; H Nüllen; K Rass; S Reich-Schupke; D Stenger; M Stücker; C G Schmedt; T Schwarz; J Tesmann; J Teßarek; S Werth; E Valesky
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 1.198

4.  Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Endovenous 1,940-nm Laser Ablation and Radiofrequency Ablation for Incompetent Saphenous Veins.

Authors:  Insoo Park; Sun-Cheol Park
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2020-12-11

Review 5.  Review on Laser Technology in Intravascular Imaging and Treatment.

Authors:  Jing Li; Ce Shang; Yao Rong; Jingxuan Sun; Yuan Cheng; Boqu He; Zihao Wang; Ming Li; Jianguo Ma; Bo Fu; Xunming Ji
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 6.745

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.