Literature DB >> 27178313

The root canal morphology in mandibular first premolars: a comparative evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography and micro-computed tomography.

Dan Zhang1, Junhong Chen2, Guihua Lan1, Min Li1, Jianping An1, Xiujie Wen1, Luchuan Liu1, Manjing Deng3,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in detecting the root canal morphology of mandibular first premolars using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) as a reference standard.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 143 extracted human mandibular first premolars were selected and scanned using micro-CT and CBCT. The acquired images were used to evaluate the root canal morphology in each tooth, and evaluations were repeated after 2 weeks. The root canal configurations observed on the three-dimensional images were recorded, and the findings from both modalities were compared using chi-square tests. The actual agreement between the two modalities was assessed using kappa statistics.
RESULTS: In total, the root morphologies in 136 mandibular first premolars were consistently identified by both CBCT and micro-CT: type I in 104, type III in five, type V in 20, and type IX in seven. Of the remaining seven teeth, the morphology in two, one, and four teeth was identified as type I, type VII, and type IX (type 1-3 in two and type 1-2-3 in two), respectively, by micro-CT and misdiagnosed as type III, type V, and type V, respectively, by CBCT. There were no significant differences between the two modalities with regard to the accurate detection of root canal configurations, with a kappa value of 0.886 for the actual agreement.
CONCLUSIONS: Although CBCT may be accurate in detecting the root canal configuration in mandibular first premolars, it produces poorer image details compared with micro-CT. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: CBCT is a reliable radiological technique, but its accuracy in detecting details of the root canal morphology in mandibular first premolars, especially in some complex root canal configurations, needs to be improved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cone-beam computed tomography; Mandibular first premolar; Micro-computed tomography; Root canal morphology

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27178313     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-016-1852-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  28 in total

1.  The challenge of C-shaped canal systems: a comparative study of the self-adjusting file and ProTaper.

Authors:  Michael Solomonov; Frank Paqué; Bing Fan; Yuval Eilat; Louis H Berman
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 4.171

2.  Comparative evaluation of cone-beam CT equipment with micro-CT in the visualization of root canal system.

Authors:  Bence Tamas Szabo; Levente Pataky; Regina Mikusi; Pal Fejerdy; Csaba Dobo-Nagy
Journal:  Ann Ist Super Sanita       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.663

3.  A micro-computed tomography study of the root canal morphology of the mandibular first premolar in a population from southwestern China.

Authors:  Na Liu; Xiangjie Li; Ning Liu; Lijun Ye; Jianping An; Xin Nie; Luchuan Liu; Manjing Deng
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  The root and root canal morphology of the human mandibular first premolar: a literature review.

Authors:  Blaine M Cleghorn; William H Christie; Cecilia C S Dong
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 4.171

5.  Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary first molar mesiobuccal root canal configuration and curvature using micro-computed tomography.

Authors:  Jong-Wook Park; Jong-Ki Lee; Byung-Hyun Ha; Jeong-Ho Choi; Hiran Perinpanayagam
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2009-04-22

6.  Root and canal morphology of mandibular first premolars with radicular grooves.

Authors:  Y Gu; Y Zhang; Z Liao
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 2.633

7.  Three-rooted premolar analyzed by high-resolution and cone beam CT.

Authors:  Caroline Marca; Paul M H Dummer; Susan Bryant; Fabiana Vieira Vier-Pelisser; Marcus Vinicius Reis Só; Vania Fontanella; Vinicius D'avila Dutra; José Antonio Poli de Figueiredo
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Evaluation of root canal configuration of maxillary molars in a Brazilian population using cone-beam computed tomographic imaging: an in vivo study.

Authors:  Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal Silva; Yuri Nejaim; Amaro I V Silva; Francisco Haiter-Neto; Alexandre A Zaia; Nestor Cohenca
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 4.171

9.  Evaluation of root and canal morphology of maxillary permanent first molars in a North American population by cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Jing Guo; Arjang Vahidnia; Parish Sedghizadeh; Reyes Enciso
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2014-03-29       Impact factor: 4.171

Review 10.  The miniature pig: a useful large animal model for dental and orofacial research.

Authors:  S Wang; Y Liu; D Fang; S Shi
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.511

View more
  15 in total

1.  Canal transportation and centering ratio after preparation in severely curved canals: analysis by micro-computed tomography and double-digital radiography.

Authors:  Ane Poly; Fouad AlMalki; Fernando Marques; Bekir Karabucak
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Root canal narrowing patterns of mandibular first premolars on panoramic radiographs according to the number of root canals diagnosed on cone beam computed tomographic images.

Authors:  Yusuke Shimada; Ikuho Kojima; Takashi Nishioka; Maya Sakamoto; Masahiro Iikubo
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 2.634

3.  Micro-CT assessment of radicular pulp calcifications in extracted maxillary first molar teeth.

Authors:  Ali Keleş; Cangül Keskin; Marco Aurélio Versiani
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Root canal morphology and symmetry of mandibular second premolars using cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Faisal T Alghamdi; Wafaa A Khalil
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 1.852

5.  The Diagnostic Yield of Dental Radiography and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for the Identification of Dentoalveolar Lesions in Cats.

Authors:  Colleen M Heney; Boaz Arzi; Philip H Kass; David C Hatcher; Frank J M Verstraete
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-02-21

6.  Surgically-oriented anatomical study of mandibular premolars: A CBCT study.

Authors:  Stefano Corbella; Martino Baruffaldi; Isabella Perondi; Silvio Taschieri
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2019-10-01

7.  Root and Root Canal Morphology Differences Between Genders: A Comprehensive in-vivo CBCT Study in a Saudi Population.

Authors:  Mohammed Mashyakhy; Gianluca Gambarini
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2019-09

8.  Frequency of non-single canals in mandibular premolars and correlations with other anatomical variants: an in vivo cone beam computed tomography study.

Authors:  Young-Eun Jang; Yemi Kim; BomSahn Kim; Sin-Young Kim; Hyung-Jong Kim
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Root Canal Morphology of Maxillary Premolars in a Saudi Population.

Authors:  Abdullah Alqedairi; Hussam Alfawaz; Yousef Al-Dahman; Faisal Alnassar; Asma Al-Jebaly; Sara Alsubait
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Dynamic Evaluation of Orthodontically-Induced Tooth Movement, Root Resorption, and Alveolar Bone Remodeling in Rats by in Vivo Micro-Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Jianping Zhou; Fengxue Yang; Xiaolin Xu; Gang Feng; Jun Chen; Jinglin Song; Hongwei Dai
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-11-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.