Literature DB >> 27178143

A controlled study of use of patient-reported outcomes to improve assessment of late effects after treatment for head-and-neck cancer.

Trille Kjaer1, Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton2, Elo Andersen3, Randi Karlsen2, Anni Linnet Nielsen3, Merete Kjaer Hansen4, Kirsten Frederiksen4, Christoffer Johansen5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: To test the effect of longitudinal feedback on late effects reported by survivors of head-and-neck cancer (HNC) to clinicians during regular follow-up.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 266 participants were sequentially assigned to either control or intervention group and filled in electronic versions of the EORTC QLQ C-30, H&N35, HADS and a study-specific list of symptoms at up to two consecutive follow-up visits. Participants' symptoms displayed according to severity were provided to the clinician for the intervention group but not for the control group. Linear mixed-effects models were used to examine the number of symptoms assessed by clinicians (primary outcome). Multivariate linear regression models examined participants' long-term symptom control and QoL (secondary outcome).
RESULTS: More symptoms were assessed by clinicians in the intervention group at all three visits (P<0.001, <0.001, and P=0.04). No effect was observed on most patient outcomes. When prompted by patient-reported outcomes at consultations, clinicians and patients were in better agreement about the occurrence of severe symptoms at all three visits.
CONCLUSION: Timely patient-reported outcomes to clinicians in routine follow-up of HNC survivors enhanced clinicians' rates of assessment of late symptoms. Giving reports of patient-reported outcome to clinicians had limited impact on participants' QoL or symptom burden.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Head-and-neck cancer; Late effects; Patient-reported outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27178143     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.04.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  4 in total

Review 1.  Patient-reported outcome measurement implementation in cancer survivors: a systematic review.

Authors:  Surbhi Singhal; James Dickerson; Michael J Glover; Mohana Roy; Michelle Chiu; Timothy Ellis-Caleo; Gavin Hui; Carla Tamayo; Nele Loecher; Hong-Nei Wong; Lauren C Heathcote; Lidia Schapira
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 4.442

2.  Inter-fraction robustness of intensity-modulated proton therapy in the post-operative treatment of oropharyngeal and oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Christina Hague; Marianne Aznar; Lei Dong; Alireza Fotouhi-Ghiam; Lip Wai Lee; Taoran Li; Alexander Lin; Matthew Lowe; John N Lukens; Andrew McPartlin; Shannon O'Reilly; Nick Slevin; Samuel Swisher-Mcclure; David Thomson; Marcel Van Herk; Catharine West; Wei Zou; Boon-Keng Kevin Teo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Anatomic changes in head and neck intensity-modulated proton therapy: Comparison between robust optimization and online adaptation.

Authors:  Arthur Lalonde; Mislav Bobić; Brian Winey; Joost Verburg; Gregory C Sharp; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 6.901

4.  Patient-reported outcomes in head and neck cancer: prospective multi-institutional patient-reported toxicity.

Authors:  M Sean Peach; Daniel M Trifiletti; Carolyn Vachani; Karen Arnold-Korzeniowski; Christina Bach; Margaret Hampshire; James M Metz; Christine E Hill-Kayser
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2018-07-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.