Jaime Ruiz-Tovar1, Jose Luis Muñoz2, Juan Gonzalez3, Lorea Zubiaga4, Alejandro García3, Montiel Jimenez3, Carlos Ferrigni3, Manuel Durán3. 1. Department of Surgery, Bariatric Surgery Unit, University Hospital Rey Juan Carlos, Corazon de Maria, 64, 7 J, 28002, Madrid, Spain. jruiztovar@gmail.com. 2. Department of Anaesthesiology, Bariatric Surgery Unit, University Hospital Elche, Alicante, Spain. 3. Department of Surgery, Bariatric Surgery Unit, University Hospital Rey Juan Carlos, Corazon de Maria, 64, 7 J, 28002, Madrid, Spain. 4. Department of Surgery, Bariatric Surgery Unit, University Hospital Elche, Alicante, Spain.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Although bariatric surgery is actually mainly performed laparoscopically, analgesic optimization continues being essential to reduce complications and to improve the patients' comfort. The aim of this study is to evaluate the postoperative pain after analgesia iv exclusively, or associated with epidural analgesia or port-sites infiltration with bupivacaine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective randomized study of patients undergoinglaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy between 2012 and 2014 was performed. Patients were divided into three groups: Analgesia iv exclusively (Group 1), epidural analgesia + analgesia iv (Group 2) and port-sites infiltration + analgesia iv (Group 3). Pain was quantified by means of a Visual Analogic Scale, and morphine rescue needs were determined 24 h after surgery. RESULTS:A total of 147 were included. Groups were comparable in age, gender and BMI. There were no differences in operation time, complications, mortality or hospital stay between groups. Median pain 24 h after surgery was 5 in Group 1, 2.5 in Group 2 and 2 in Group 3 (P = 0.01), without statistically significant differences between Groups 2 and 3. In Group 1, morphine rescue was necessary in 16.3 % of the cases, 2 % in Group 2 and 2 % in Group 3 (P = 0.014), without statistically significant differences between Groups 2 and 3. CONCLUSION: Epidural analgesia and port-sites infiltration with bupivacaine, associated with analgesia iv, reduce the postoperative pain, when compared with analgesia iv exclusively. CLINICAL TRIALS: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02662660.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: Although bariatric surgery is actually mainly performed laparoscopically, analgesic optimization continues being essential to reduce complications and to improve the patients' comfort. The aim of this study is to evaluate the postoperative pain after analgesia iv exclusively, or associated with epidural analgesia or port-sites infiltration with bupivacaine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective randomized study of patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy between 2012 and 2014 was performed. Patients were divided into three groups: Analgesia iv exclusively (Group 1), epidural analgesia + analgesia iv (Group 2) and port-sites infiltration + analgesia iv (Group 3). Pain was quantified by means of a Visual Analogic Scale, and morphine rescue needs were determined 24 h after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 147 were included. Groups were comparable in age, gender and BMI. There were no differences in operation time, complications, mortality or hospital stay between groups. Median pain 24 h after surgery was 5 in Group 1, 2.5 in Group 2 and 2 in Group 3 (P = 0.01), without statistically significant differences between Groups 2 and 3. In Group 1, morphine rescue was necessary in 16.3 % of the cases, 2 % in Group 2 and 2 % in Group 3 (P = 0.014), without statistically significant differences between Groups 2 and 3. CONCLUSION: Epidural analgesia and port-sites infiltration with bupivacaine, associated with analgesia iv, reduce the postoperative pain, when compared with analgesia iv exclusively. CLINICAL TRIALS: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02662660.
Authors: Rafael Moncada; Linas Martinaitis; Manuel Landecho; Fernando Rotellar; Carlos Sanchez-Justicia; Manuel Bellver; Magdalena de la Higuera; Camilo Silva; Beatriz Osés; Elena Martín; Susana Pérez; Jose Luis Hernandez-Lizoain; Gema Frühbeck; Victor Valentí Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: T Bisgaard; B Klarskov; V B Kristiansen; T Callesen; S Schulze; H Kehlet; J Rosenberg Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 1999-10 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: Hoani Macfater; Weisi Xia; Sanket Srinivasa; Andrew Graham Hill; Marc Van De Velde; Girsh P Joshi Journal: World J Surg Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Jaime Ruiz-Tovar; Gilberto Gonzalez; Andrei Sarmiento; Miguel A Carbajo; Javier Ortiz-de-Solorzano; Maria Jose Castro; Jose Maria Jimenez; Lorea Zubiaga Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2020-01-13 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Saskia L Boerboom; Ann de Haes; Lianne Vd Wetering; Edo O Aarts; Ignace M C Janssen; Jose W Geurts; Ed T Kamphuis Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Jaime Ruiz-Tovar; Alejandro Garcia; Carlos Ferrigni; Juan Gonzalez; Cesar Levano-Linares; Montiel Jimenez-Fuertes; Carolina Llavero; Manuel Duran Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Brian Shea; William Boyan; James Botta; Syed Ali; Yaniv Fenig; Ethan Paulin; Steven Binenbaum; Frank Borao Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 4.129