| Literature DB >> 27177924 |
Yun Lu1, Hongwei Li1, Shi-Wei Shen2, Zhen-Hai Shen3,4, Ming Xu5, Cheng-Jian Yang2, Feng Li1, Yin-Bo Feng1, Jing-Ting Yun1, Ling Wang1, Hua-Jin Qi2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It has been shown that irisin levels are reduced in skeletal muscle and plasma of obese rats; however, the effect of exercise training on irisin level remains controversial. We aim to evaluate the association of swimming exercise with serum irisin level and other obesity-associated parameters.Entities:
Keywords: Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA); Irisin; Swimming exercise; Visceral fat
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27177924 PMCID: PMC4866429 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-016-0263-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1The body weight, Body length, Abdominal circumference, Lee’s index, Blood lipid, FPG and insulin values in all 4 groups. Body weight, abdominal circumference, Lee’s index and TC level were higher in the HFD (high-fat diet and sedentary group) and HFDE (high-fat diet and exercise group) groups than in the ND (normal diet and sedentary group) and NDE (normal diet and exercise group) groups (all P values < 0.05) after 8 weeks of diet feeding, and higher body weight, abdominal circumference, Lee’s index, TC and TG levels were al recorded in the HFD and HFDE groups compared to the ND and NDE groups at 16 weeks (all P values < 0.05). At 24 weeks (after swimming exercise), Lee’s index, TG and TC levels were lower in the HFDE group than in the HFD group (all P values < 0.05). In addition, body weight, abdominal circumference, Lee’s index, TG and TC levels were higher in the HFD group than in the ND and NDE groups (all P values < 0.05). Significantly reduced Lee’s index, serum TG, LDL and insulin levels (all P values < 0.05) and significantly increased body size (P < 0.05) in the HFDE group after swimming exercise in relation to the values before swimming exercise, while significantly decreased Lee’s index and TG level (all P values < 0.05) and significantly increased body weight, body size and abdominal circumference (all P values < 0.05) were found in the NDE group after swimming exercise as compared to those before swimming exercise (Fig. 1). *, p < 0.05 compared with ND and **,p < 0.01 compared with ND;#, p < 0.05 compared with NDE and ##, p < 0.01 compared with NDE;£,p < 0.05 compared with HFD and ££,p < 0.01 compared with HFD;§, p < 0.05 compared with 16th, §§, p < 0.01compared with 16th
Fig. 2Comparison of serum irisin level and fat parameters among groups at 24 weeks. Significant differences in serum irisin level, fat mass, percentage of fat mass and visceral fat mass among the four groups (all P values < 0.05). A significantly higher serum irisin level was detected in the NDE (normal diet and exercise group) group compared to the ND (normal diet and sedentary group), HFDE (high-fat diet and exercise group) and HFD (high-fat diet and sedentary group) groups (all P values < 0.05), while the serum irisin level was greater in the ND and HFDE groups than in the HFD group (both P values < 0.05). The fat mass and percentage fat mass were significantly lower in the HFDE group than in the HFD group (both P values < 0.01), while higher fat mass and percentage fat mass were observed in the HFD group compared to the ND and NDE groups (both P values < 0.01). The visceral fat mass was significantly lower in the HFDE group than in the HFD group (P < 0.01); however, a higher visceral fat mass was found in the HFD group compared to those in the ND (P < 0.05) and NDE groups (P < 0.01) (Fig. 2). *, p < 0.05 compared with ND and **, p < 0.01 compared with ND. #, p < 0.05 compared with NDE and ##, p < 0.01 compared with NDE. £, p < 0.05 compared with HFD and ££, p < 0.01 compared with HFD
Fig 3Whole body image of a Wistar rat analyzed with the Hologic in 4 groups at 24 weeks
Pearson correlation analysis between serum irisin level and obesity-associated parameters
| The correlation coefficient |
| |
|---|---|---|
| TG(24th) | −0.771 | 0.00 |
| TC(24th) | −0.389 | 0.045 |
| Fat mass | −0.576 | 0.00 |
| Fat mass% | −0.680 | 0.00 |
| Visceral fat mass | −0.439 | 0.022 |