Man Kyu Choi1, Sung Min Kim2, Jae Kwan Lim3. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, 892 Dongnam-ro, Gangdong-gu, Seoul, 134-727, South Korea. spinekim@khu.ac.kr. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, Bon Neurosurgery Clinic, Paju, South Korea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan is an easy and cost-effective method of assessing bone mineral density (BMD). However, in patients with degenerative changes of the spine, overestimation of T-score on DEXA scan can occur despite low BMD during pedicle screw placement in spine surgery. The goal of this study is to assess BMD using Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements from computed tomography (CT) and to correlate these with DEXA-assessed T-scores in non-degenerative and degenerative patients. METHODS: This study included 80 non-degenerative and 30 degenerative patients who underwent DEXA and spine CT assessment. The HU value on the mid-body axial images of CT and DEXA-assessed T-scores were measured from the L1-4 vertebrae. RESULTS: In the non-degenerative group, HU values had a strong positive correlation with BMD and T-score, exhibiting correlation coefficients (r) greater than 0.7: the r-value (p value) between HU and T-score of the L1 vertebra was 0.701 (<0.001); 0.709 (<0.001) for L2; 0.709 (<0.001) for L3; 0.649 (<0.001) for L4; and 0.734 (<0.001) for L1-4. BMD assessed as +100 HU matched a T-score of -2.0 while +150, +200 HU matched T-scores of -1.0, 0.0. The differences were significant (p < 0.001). In the degenerative group, there was a weak positive correlation with r of approximately 0.4: the r-value (p value) was 0.300 (0.104); 0.457 (0.013); 0.433 (0.017); 0.447 (0.013) at each segment and 0.398 (0.031) for L1-4. CONCLUSIONS: HU values provide a meaningful assessment of BMD and have a strong correlation with T-score. However, in degenerative patients, the T-score tended to be higher than the actual BMD. BMD assessment using HU might be helpful in predicting real BMD in patients undergoing instrumentation surgery with degenerative changes of the spine.
BACKGROUND: Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan is an easy and cost-effective method of assessing bone mineral density (BMD). However, in patients with degenerative changes of the spine, overestimation of T-score on DEXA scan can occur despite low BMD during pedicle screw placement in spine surgery. The goal of this study is to assess BMD using Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements from computed tomography (CT) and to correlate these with DEXA-assessed T-scores in non-degenerative and degenerative patients. METHODS: This study included 80 non-degenerative and 30 degenerative patients who underwent DEXA and spine CT assessment. The HU value on the mid-body axial images of CT and DEXA-assessed T-scores were measured from the L1-4 vertebrae. RESULTS: In the non-degenerative group, HU values had a strong positive correlation with BMD and T-score, exhibiting correlation coefficients (r) greater than 0.7: the r-value (p value) between HU and T-score of the L1 vertebra was 0.701 (<0.001); 0.709 (<0.001) for L2; 0.709 (<0.001) for L3; 0.649 (<0.001) for L4; and 0.734 (<0.001) for L1-4. BMD assessed as +100 HU matched a T-score of -2.0 while +150, +200 HU matched T-scores of -1.0, 0.0. The differences were significant (p < 0.001). In the degenerative group, there was a weak positive correlation with r of approximately 0.4: the r-value (p value) was 0.300 (0.104); 0.457 (0.013); 0.433 (0.017); 0.447 (0.013) at each segment and 0.398 (0.031) for L1-4. CONCLUSIONS: HU values provide a meaningful assessment of BMD and have a strong correlation with T-score. However, in degenerative patients, the T-score tended to be higher than the actual BMD. BMD assessment using HU might be helpful in predicting real BMD in patients undergoing instrumentation surgery with degenerative changes of the spine.
Entities:
Keywords:
BMD; DEXA scan; Degenerative spine; Hounsfield units
Authors: Bernhard Wilhelm Ullrich; Philipp Schenk; Ulrich J Spiegl; Thomas Mendel; Gunther Olaf Hofmann Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2018-10-19 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Swamy Kurra; H Francis Farhadi; Umesh Metkar; Vibhu Krishnan Viswanathan; Amy J Minnema; Richard A Tallarico; William F Lavelle Journal: N Am Spine Soc J Date: 2022-06-09
Authors: Max J Scheyerer; Bernhard Ullrich; Georg Osterhoff; Ulrich A Spiegl; Klaus J Schnake Journal: Unfallchirurg Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 1.000
Authors: Elisabeth S Young; May J Reed; Tam N Pham; Joel A Gross; Lisa A Taitsman; Stephen J Kaplan Journal: Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res Date: 2017-11-06