Seon Ae Roh1,2,3, In Ja Park1,2, Yong Sik Yoon1,2,3, Yi Hong Kwon1,3, Jin Hwa Chung1, Tae Won Kim1,4, Dong Hyung Cho5, Byung Ho Lim6, Seon Kyu Kim6, Seon Young Kim6, Yong Sung Kim7, Jin Cheon Kim8,9,10. 1. Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. 2. Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea. 3. Institute of Innovative Cancer Research, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. 4. Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. 5. Graduate School of East-West Medical Science, Kyung Hee University, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, Korea. 6. Medical Genomics Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, 125 Gwahak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 34141, Korea. 7. Medical Genomics Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, 125 Gwahak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 34141, Korea. yongsung@kribb.re.kr. 8. Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. jckim@amc.seoul.kr. 9. Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea. jckim@amc.seoul.kr. 10. Institute of Innovative Cancer Research, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. jckim@amc.seoul.kr.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Bevacizumab improves survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) under chemotherapy, but few predictive markers have been identified. METHODS: To investigate chemosensitive single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of mCRC, we performed exome sequencing and RNA sequencing in 19 patients. A clinical association analysis was performed with the other 116 patients who had received chemotherapy to bevacizumab regimens. In vivo biodistribution studies and [(18)F]FDG-PET imaging were performed on mice bearing human colorectal cancer (HCT116 and SW480) xenografts after injection of bevacizumab with 5-FU, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI). RESULTS: PPP1R15A rs557806 showed the most significant association with FRB-driven tumor IR in exome sequencing and the highest correlation (r = 0.74) with drug responses in RNA sequencing. Patients homozygous for the reference alleles (GG) of PPP1R15A rs557806 exhibited greater disease control rate and a tendency toward greater objective response rate (ORR) than those with homozygous or heterozygous substitution alleles (GC and CC; P = 0.027 and 0.073, respectively). In xenografted mice, HCT116 clones transfected with the G allele at PPP1R15A rs557806 were more sensitive to bevacizumab regimens than those with the C allele. Tumor volume of xenografts with the G allele was significantly lower than that of xenografts with the C allele (P = 0.004, day 13). [(18)F]FDG uptake decreased to 75 % in HCT116 xenograft-bearing mice with the G allele, whereas [(18)F]FDG uptake was 42 % in mice xenografts with the C allele (P = 0.032). ANXA11 rs1049550, a predictive biomarker of SNP described in our previous study, was validated using the xenograft model. Tumor volume and [(18)F]FDG uptake analyses showed that tumors in the SW480 xenografts expressing the substitution allele (T) at ANXA11 rs1049550 were more susceptible to FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab-induced suppression than those expressing the reference allele (C) (P = 0.001 and 0.026, respectively). CONCLUSION: ANXA11 rs1049550 and PPP1R15A rs557806 may improve the identification of mCRC patients sensitive to bevacizumab regimens, and further validation is required in large cohorts.
PURPOSE:Bevacizumab improves survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) under chemotherapy, but few predictive markers have been identified. METHODS: To investigate chemosensitive single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of mCRC, we performed exome sequencing and RNA sequencing in 19 patients. A clinical association analysis was performed with the other 116 patients who had received chemotherapy to bevacizumab regimens. In vivo biodistribution studies and [(18)F]FDG-PET imaging were performed on mice bearing humancolorectal cancer (HCT116 and SW480) xenografts after injection of bevacizumab with 5-FU, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI). RESULTS:PPP1R15Ars557806 showed the most significant association with FRB-driven tumor IR in exome sequencing and the highest correlation (r = 0.74) with drug responses in RNA sequencing. Patients homozygous for the reference alleles (GG) of PPP1R15Ars557806 exhibited greater disease control rate and a tendency toward greater objective response rate (ORR) than those with homozygous or heterozygous substitution alleles (GC and CC; P = 0.027 and 0.073, respectively). In xenografted mice, HCT116 clones transfected with the G allele at PPP1R15Ars557806 were more sensitive to bevacizumab regimens than those with the C allele. Tumor volume of xenografts with the G allele was significantly lower than that of xenografts with the C allele (P = 0.004, day 13). [(18)F]FDG uptake decreased to 75 % in HCT116 xenograft-bearing mice with the G allele, whereas [(18)F]FDG uptake was 42 % in mice xenografts with the C allele (P = 0.032). ANXA11rs1049550, a predictive biomarker of SNP described in our previous study, was validated using the xenograft model. Tumor volume and [(18)F]FDG uptake analyses showed that tumors in the SW480 xenografts expressing the substitution allele (T) at ANXA11rs1049550 were more susceptible to FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab-induced suppression than those expressing the reference allele (C) (P = 0.001 and 0.026, respectively). CONCLUSION:ANXA11rs1049550 and PPP1R15Ars557806 may improve the identification of mCRC patients sensitive to bevacizumab regimens, and further validation is required in large cohorts.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Aaron McKenna; Matthew Hanna; Eric Banks; Andrey Sivachenko; Kristian Cibulskis; Andrew Kernytsky; Kiran Garimella; David Altshuler; Stacey Gabriel; Mark Daly; Mark A DePristo Journal: Genome Res Date: 2010-07-19 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Daniel C Koboldt; Qunyuan Zhang; David E Larson; Dong Shen; Michael D McLellan; Ling Lin; Christopher A Miller; Elaine R Mardis; Li Ding; Richard K Wilson Journal: Genome Res Date: 2012-02-02 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Jin C Kim; Seon Y Kim; Dong H Cho; Ye J Ha; Eun Y Choi; Chan W Kim; Seon A Roh; Tae W Kim; Hyoungseok Ju; Yong S Kim Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-01-14 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: A K Koutras; A G Antonacopoulou; A G Eleftheraki; F-I Dimitrakopoulos; A Koumarianou; I Varthalitis; F Fostira; J Sgouros; E Briasoulis; E Bournakis; D Bafaloukos; I Bompolaki; E Galani; K T Kalogeras; D Pectasides; G Fountzilas; H P Kalofonos Journal: Pharmacogenomics J Date: 2011-08-16 Impact factor: 3.550
Authors: J C Kim; Y J Ha; S A Roh; E Y Choi; Y S Yoon; K P Kim; Y S Hong; T W Kim; D H Cho; S Y Kim; Y S Kim Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2013-04-11 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Llara Prieto-Fernández; Sofía T Menéndez; María Otero-Rosales; Irene Montoro-Jiménez; Francisco Hermida-Prado; Juana M García-Pedrero; Saúl Álvarez-Teijeiro Journal: Front Cell Dev Biol Date: 2022-09-28
Authors: Qing Zhou; Samantha O Perakis; Peter Ulz; Sumitra Mohan; Jakob M Riedl; Emina Talakic; Sigurd Lax; Martin Tötsch; Gerald Hoefler; Thomas Bauernhofer; Martin Pichler; Armin Gerger; Jochen B Geigl; Ellen Heitzer; Michael R Speicher Journal: Genome Med Date: 2020-02-22 Impact factor: 11.117