Literature DB >> 2717700

Factors determining the digestive efficiency of the domesticated donkey (Equus asinus asinus).

H Izraely1, I Choshniak, C E Stevens, M W Demment, A Shkolnik.   

Abstract

Factors determining the digestive efficiency of donkeys were studied in animals fed either a low quality roughage (wheat straw: 77.1% neutral detergent fibre, 2.8% crude protein) or a high quality forage (alfalfa hay: 47.5% neutral detergent fibre, 22.7% crude protein). The neutral detergent fibre (NDF) intake when fed wheat straw was 1693 +/- 268 g animal-1 day-1, 10% higher than when fed alfalfa hay. Digestive coefficient of NDF and acid detergent fibre (ADF) when fed wheat straw amounted to 50.9 +/- 4.9 and 42.0 +/- 4.1% respectively. NDF and ADF apparent digestibilities and mean retention times (37.7 +/- 1.7 and 36.4 +/- 3.2 h respectively) were not significantly different (P greater than 0.05) between the two diets. The donkey appears to digest cell wall constituents as efficiently as the Bedouin goat when on low quality roughage, but less efficiently when fed alfalfa hay. Its energy digestibility is, however, as high as that reported for the Bedouin goat. The donkey's high energy digestibility is related to its capacity to digest soluble food components more efficiently than the ruminant. The mean retention time in the donkey is shorter than in the Bedouin goat and is consistent with its capacity to compensate for a lower quality diet by increasing its intake rate. Recycling of urea in donkeys maintained on wheat straw amounted to 75.5 +/- 13.0% of the entry rate. A decrease in the rate of renal urea filtration, coupled with an increase in the fraction reabsorbed, increased the retention of nitrogenous waste and permitted recycling of nitrogen into the gut.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2717700     DOI: 10.1113/expphysiol.1989.sp003234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Physiol        ISSN: 0144-8757


  4 in total

Review 1.  A review of the factors affecting the survival of donkeys in semi-arid regions of sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  D G Smith; R A Pearson
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Donkey genome and insight into the imprinting of fast karyotype evolution.

Authors:  Jinlong Huang; Yiping Zhao; Dongyi Bai; Wunierfu Shiraigol; Bei Li; Lihua Yang; Jing Wu; Wuyundalai Bao; Xiujuan Ren; Burenqiqige Jin; Qinan Zhao; Anaer Li; Sarula Bao; Wuyingga Bao; Zhencun Xing; Aoruga An; Yahan Gao; Ruiyuan Wei; Yirugeletu Bao; Taoketao Bao; Haige Han; Haitang Bai; Yanqing Bao; Yuhong Zhang; Dorjsuren Daidiikhuu; Wenjing Zhao; Shuyun Liu; Jinmei Ding; Weixing Ye; Fangmei Ding; Zikui Sun; Yixiang Shi; Yan Zhang; He Meng; Manglai Dugarjaviin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Survey of biochemical and oxidative profile in donkey foals suckled with one natural and one semi-artificial technique.

Authors:  Pasquale De Palo; Aristide Maggiolino; Marzia Albenzio; Elisabetta Casalino; Gianluca Neglia; Gerardo Centoducati; Alessandra Tateo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Effect of Dietary Forage/Concentrate Ratio on Nutrient Digestion and Energy and Protein Metabolism in Adult Donkeys.

Authors:  Li-Lin Liu; Xiao-Ling Zhou; Hong-Jian Yang; Rong Chen
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 2.752

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.