Paul Rohde1, Eric Stice2, Heather Shaw2, Jeff M Gau2. 1. Oregon Research Institute, Eugene, USA. Electronic address: paulr@ori.org. 2. Oregon Research Institute, Eugene, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Conduct a pilot trial testing whether a new cognitive-behavioral (CB) group prevention program that incorporated cognitive-dissonance change principles was feasible and appeared effective in reducing depressive symptoms and major depressive disorder onset relative to a brochure control condition in college students with elevated depressive symptoms. METHOD:59 college students (M age = 21.8, SD = 2.3; 68% female, 70% White) were randomized to the 6-session Change Ahead group or educational brochure control condition, completing assessments at pretest, posttest, and 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: Recruitment and screening methods were effective and intervention attendance was high (86% attended all 6 sessions). Change Ahead participants showed medium-large reductions in depressive symptoms at posttest (M d = 0.64), though the effect attenuated by 3-month follow-up. Incidence of major depression onset at 3-month follow-up was 4% for Change Ahead participants versus 13% (difference ns). CONCLUSIONS: Change Ahead appears highly feasible and showed positive indications of reduced acute phase depressive symptoms and MDD onset relative to a minimal intervention control in this initial pilot. Given the brevity of the intervention, its apparent feasibility, and the lack of evidence-based depression prevention programs for college students, continued evaluation of Change Ahead appears warranted.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Conduct a pilot trial testing whether a new cognitive-behavioral (CB) group prevention program that incorporated cognitive-dissonance change principles was feasible and appeared effective in reducing depressive symptoms and major depressive disorder onset relative to a brochure control condition in college students with elevated depressive symptoms. METHOD: 59 college students (M age = 21.8, SD = 2.3; 68% female, 70% White) were randomized to the 6-session Change Ahead group or educational brochure control condition, completing assessments at pretest, posttest, and 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: Recruitment and screening methods were effective and intervention attendance was high (86% attended all 6 sessions). Change Ahead participants showed medium-large reductions in depressive symptoms at posttest (M d = 0.64), though the effect attenuated by 3-month follow-up. Incidence of major depression onset at 3-month follow-up was 4% for Change Ahead participants versus 13% (difference ns). CONCLUSIONS: Change Ahead appears highly feasible and showed positive indications of reduced acute phase depressive symptoms and MDD onset relative to a minimal intervention control in this initial pilot. Given the brevity of the intervention, its apparent feasibility, and the lack of evidence-based depression prevention programs for college students, continued evaluation of Change Ahead appears warranted.
Authors: Carlos Blanco; Mayumi Okuda; Crystal Wright; Deborah S Hasin; Bridget F Grant; Shang-Min Liu; Mark Olfson Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2008-12
Authors: Gwen L Alexander; George W Divine; Mick P Couper; Jennifer B McClure; Melanie A Stopponi; Kristine K Fortman; Dennis D Tolsma; Victor J Strecher; Christine Cole Johnson Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Paul Rohde; Gregory N Clarke; David E Mace; Jenel S Jorgensen; John R Seeley Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 8.829