| Literature DB >> 27176465 |
Ha N D Le1, Lisa Gold2, Gavin Abbott3, David Crawford3, Sarah A McNaughton3, Cliona Ni Mhurchu4, Christina Pollard5, Kylie Ball3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Pricing strategies are a promising approach for promoting healthier dietary choices. However, robust evidence of the cost-effectiveness of pricing manipulations on dietary behaviour is limited. We aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of a 20% price reduction on fruits and vegetables and a combined skills-based behaviour change and price reduction intervention. DESIGN AND METHODS: Cost-effectiveness analysis from a societal perspective was undertaken for the randomized controlled trial Supermarket Healthy Eating for Life (SHELf). Female shoppers in Melbourne, Australia were randomized to: (1) skill-building (n = 160); (2) price reductions (n = 161); (3) combined skill-building and price reduction (n = 161); or (4) control group (n = 161). The intervention was implemented for three months followed by a six month follow-up. Costs were measured in 2012 Australian dollars. Fruit and vegetable purchasing and consumption were measured in grams/week.Entities:
Keywords: Australia; Cost; Cost-effectiveness; Economic evaluation; Fruit and vegetables; Price discounts; Skill-building
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27176465 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.04.015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Soc Sci Med ISSN: 0277-9536 Impact factor: 4.634