Literature DB >> 27175801

ATTENTIONAL BIAS TEMPORAL DYNAMICS PREDICT POSTTRAUMATIC STRESS SYMPTOMS: A PROSPECTIVE-LONGITUDINAL STUDY AMONG SOLDIERS.

Judith Schäfer1, Amit Bernstein2, Ariel Zvielli2, Michael Höfler1, Hans-Ulrich Wittchen1, Sabine Schönfeld1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Attentional bias (AB) to threat is thought to play a key role in the development and maintenance of posttraumatic stress symptomatology (PTS). Empirical evidence though is inconsistent. Some studies report associations between AB towards, threat and PTS; other studies report associations between AB away from threat and PTS; yet other studies fail to find any association. We propose that prospective-longitudinal study of AB as a dynamic process, expressed from moment to moment in time, may help to understand these mixed findings and the role of AB in PTS.
METHODS: We tested cross-sectional and prospective-longitudinal associations between AB and PTS among German soldiers from pre- to post-deployment in Afghanistan (n = 144). AB to threat and positive emotion stimuli (angry/happy faces) was measured using the dot-probe task. PTS was assessed by the PTSD Checklist. The number of traumatic experiences was assessed using CIDI-traumatic experience lists for military.
RESULTS: We found that AB dynamics (i.e., towards, away, temporal variability) at pre- and post-deployment, with respect to angry and happy faces, predicted higher levels of PTS after deployment as a function of number of intermediate traumatic experiences. Traditional aggregated mean bias scores did not similarly prospectively predict PTS post deployment.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate that AB to emotionally arousing stimuli may play an important function in the development and maintenance of PTS. We argue that mixed and null findings appear to be due to failure to model the within-subject temporal variability in AB expression. Theoretical, empirical, and clinical implications of these findings are discussed.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PTSD; attention bias; combat; information processing bias; posttraumatic stress; soldiers; trauma; trauma exposure

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27175801     DOI: 10.1002/da.22526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Depress Anxiety        ISSN: 1091-4269            Impact factor:   6.505


  7 in total

1.  The BDNF Val66Met Polymorphism Moderates the Relationship Between Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Trauma Script-evoked Attentional Bias to Cocaine Cues Among Patients with Cocaine Dependence.

Authors:  Joseph R Bardeen; Thomas A Daniel; Kim L Gratz; Eric J Vallender; Michael R Garrett; Matthew T Tull
Journal:  J Anxiety Disord       Date:  2020-04-08

2.  Unreliability as a threat to understanding psychopathology: The cautionary tale of attentional bias.

Authors:  Thomas L Rodebaugh; Rachel B Scullin; Julia K Langer; David J Dixon; Jonathan D Huppert; Amit Bernstein; Ariel Zvielli; Eric J Lenze
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2016-06-20

Review 3.  Neurocognitive and Information Processing Biases in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.

Authors:  Jennifer J Vasterling; Kimberly A Arditte Hall
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 5.285

4.  Validity of Attention Bias Variability Indices for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research: Evidence From Patient Data.

Authors:  Yaron Alon; Reut Naim; Daniel S Pine; Paul D Bliese; Yair Bar-Haim
Journal:  J Trauma Stress       Date:  2019-08-28

5.  Capturing Dynamics of Biased Attention: Are New Attention Variability Measures the Way Forward?

Authors:  Anne-Wil Kruijt; Andy P Field; Elaine Fox
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Attentional variability and avoidance of hostile stimuli decrease aggression in Chinese male juvenile delinquents.

Authors:  Ziyi Zhao; Xianglian Yu; Zhihong Ren; Lin Zhang; Xu Li
Journal:  Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 3.033

7.  Enhanced Attentional Bias Variability in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and its Relationship to More General Impairments in Cognitive Control.

Authors:  Diane Swick; Victoria Ashley
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.