Literature DB >> 27174933

Dual daughter strand incision is processive and increases the efficiency of DNA mismatch repair.

Nicolaas Hermans1, Charlie Laffeber1, Michele Cristovão1, Mariela Artola-Borán2, Yannicka Mardenborough1, Pauline Ikpa1, Aruna Jaddoe1, Herrie H K Winterwerp3, Claire Wyman4, Josef Jiricny2, Roland Kanaar4, Peter Friedhoff5, Joyce H G Lebbink6.   

Abstract

DNA mismatch repair (MMR) is an evolutionarily-conserved process responsible for the repair of replication errors. In Escherichia coli, MMR is initiated by MutS and MutL, which activate MutH to incise transiently-hemimethylated GATC sites. MMR efficiency depends on the distribution of these GATC sites. To understand which molecular events determine repair efficiency, we quantitatively studied the effect of strand incision on unwinding and excision activity. The distance between mismatch and GATC site did not influence the strand incision rate, and an increase in the number of sites enhanced incision only to a minor extent. Two GATC sites were incised by the same activated MMR complex in a processive manner, with MutS, the closed form of MutL and MutH displaying different roles. Unwinding and strand excision were more efficient on a substrate with two nicks flanking the mismatch, as compared to substrates containing a single nick or two nicks on the same side of the mismatch. Introduction of multiple nicks by the human MutLα endonuclease also contributed to increased repair efficiency. Our data support a general model of prokaryotic and eukaryotic MMR in which, despite mechanistic differences, mismatch-activated complexes facilitate efficient repair by creating multiple daughter strand nicks.
© The Author(s) 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27174933      PMCID: PMC5001592          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  70 in total

1.  Large conformational changes in MutS during DNA scanning, mismatch recognition and repair signalling.

Authors:  Ruoyi Qiu; Vanessa C DeRocco; Credle Harris; Anushi Sharma; Manju M Hingorani; Dorothy A Erie; Keith R Weninger
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Human exonuclease I is required for 5' and 3' mismatch repair.

Authors:  Jochen Genschel; Laura R Bazemore; Paul Modrich
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-01-24       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Depletion of the cellular amounts of the MutS and MutH methyl-directed mismatch repair proteins in stationary-phase Escherichia coli K-12 cells.

Authors:  G Feng; H C Tsui; M E Winkler
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 4.  Eukaryotic Mismatch Repair in Relation to DNA Replication.

Authors:  Thomas A Kunkel; Dorothy A Erie
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 16.830

5.  A human 200-kDa protein binds selectively to DNA fragments containing G.T mismatches.

Authors:  J Jiricny; M Hughes; N Corman; B B Rudkin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Bidirectional excision in methyl-directed mismatch repair.

Authors:  M Grilley; J Griffith; P Modrich
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1993-06-05       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  DNA mismatch correction in a defined system.

Authors:  R S Lahue; K G Au; P Modrich
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-07-14       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Structure of the human MutSalpha DNA lesion recognition complex.

Authors:  Joshua J Warren; Timothy J Pohlhaus; Anita Changela; Ravi R Iyer; Paul L Modrich; Lorena S Beese
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 17.970

9.  Slow conformational changes in MutS and DNA direct ordered transitions between mismatch search, recognition and signaling of DNA repair.

Authors:  Anushi Sharma; Christopher Doucette; F Noah Biro; Manju M Hingorani
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Magnesium coordination controls the molecular switch function of DNA mismatch repair protein MutS.

Authors:  Joyce H G Lebbink; Alexander Fish; Annet Reumer; Ganesh Natrajan; Herrie H K Winterwerp; Titia K Sixma
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  5 in total

1.  Intrinsically disordered regions regulate both catalytic and non-catalytic activities of the MutLα mismatch repair complex.

Authors:  Yoori Kim; Christopher M Furman; Carol M Manhart; Eric Alani; Ilya J Finkelstein
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  Stochastic Processes and Component Plasticity Governing DNA Mismatch Repair.

Authors:  Jiaquan Liu; Jong-Bong Lee; Richard Fishel
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  The selection process of licensing a DNA mismatch for repair.

Authors:  Rafael Fernandez-Leiro; Doreth Bhairosing-Kok; Vladislav Kunetsky; Charlie Laffeber; Herrie H Winterwerp; Flora Groothuizen; Alexander Fish; Joyce H G Lebbink; Peter Friedhoff; Titia K Sixma; Meindert H Lamers
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 15.369

4.  The unstructured linker arms of MutL enable GATC site incision beyond roadblocks during initiation of DNA mismatch repair.

Authors:  Yannicka S N Mardenborough; Katerina Nitsenko; Charlie Laffeber; Camille Duboc; Enes Sahin; Audrey Quessada-Vial; Herrie H K Winterwerp; Titia K Sixma; Roland Kanaar; Peter Friedhoff; Terence R Strick; Joyce H G Lebbink
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 5.  Strand discrimination in DNA mismatch repair.

Authors:  Christopher D Putnam
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2021-06-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.