Literature DB >> 27174112

Left atrial appendage closure: patient, device and post-procedure drug selection.

Apostolos Tzikas1, Martin W Bergmann.   

Abstract

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC), a device-based therapy for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation, is considered an alternative to oral anticoagulation therapy, particularly for patients at high risk of bleeding. Proof of concept has been demonstrated by the PROTECT AF and PREVAIL trials which evaluated the WATCHMAN device (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) versus warfarin, showing favourable outcome for the device group. The most commonly used devices for LAAC are the WATCHMAN and its successor, the WATCHMAN FLX (Boston Scientific) and the AMPLATZER Cardiac Plug and more recently the AMPLATZER Amulet device (both St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA). The procedure is typically performed via a transseptal puncture under fluoroscopic and echocardiographic guidance. Technically, it is considered quite demanding due to the anatomic variability and fragility of the appendage. Careful material manipulation, adequate operator training, and good cardiac imaging and device sizing allow a safe, uneventful procedure. Post-procedure antithrombotic drug selection is based on the patient's history, indication and quality of LAAC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27174112     DOI: 10.4244/EIJV12SXA10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EuroIntervention        ISSN: 1774-024X            Impact factor:   6.534


  5 in total

1.  Five years of keeping a watch on the left atrial appendage-how has the WATCHMAN fared?

Authors:  Mohammad-Ali Jazayeri; Venkat Vuddanda; Valay Parikh; Madhav Lavu; Donita Atkins; Y Madhu Reddy; Jayant Nath; Dhanunjaya R Lakkireddy
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Real-world experience comparing two common left atrial appendage closure devices.

Authors:  Christian Fastner; Lea Hoffmann; Mohamed Aboukoura; Michael Behnes; Siegfried Lang; Martin Borggrefe; Ibrahim Akin; Christoph A Nienaber
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 2.298

3.  Contrast-enhanced transesophageal echocardiography predicts neo-intimal coverage of device post-left atrial appendage closure.

Authors:  Xiaoxia Wu; Dali Fan; Wei Huang; Yuezhi Meng; Tao Wan; Ezra A Amsterdam; Yejia Shen; Yilong Chen; Dongxing Ma
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 3.487

4.  Impact of left atrial appendage morphology on thrombus formation after successful left atrial appendage occlusion: Assessment with cardiac-computed-tomography.

Authors:  Wulf Dieker; Michael Behnes; Christian Fastner; Benjamin Sartorius; Annika Wenke; Ishar Sing-Gill; Ibrahim El-Battrawy; Jürgen Kuschyk; Theano Papavassiliu; Ursula Hoffmann; Kambis Mashayekhi; Stefan O Schoenberg; Martin Borggrefe; Thomas Henzler; Ibrahim Akin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Risk stratification in patients undergoing interventional left atrial appendage occlusion-Prognostic impact of EuroSCORE II.

Authors:  Michael Gotzmann; Dinah S Choudhury; Maximilian Hogeweg; Florian Heringhaus; Andreas Mügge; Andreas Pflaumbaum
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 2.882

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.