Literature DB >> 27173891

Using offsets to mitigate environmental impacts of major projects: A stakeholder analysis.

Nigel Martin1, Megan Evans2, John Rice3, Sumit Lodhia4, Philip Gibbons2.   

Abstract

Global patterns of development suggest that as more projects are initiated, business will need to find acceptable measures to conserve biodiversity. The application of environmental offsets allows firms to combine their economic interests with the environment and society. This article presents the results of a multi-stakeholder analysis related to the design of offsets principles, policies, and regulatory processes, using a large infrastructure projects context. The results indicate that business was primarily interested in using direct offsets and other compensatory measures, known internationally as indirect offsets, to acquit their environmental management obligations. In contrast, the environmental sector argued that highly principled and scientifically robust offsets programs should be implemented and maintained for enduring environmental protection. Stakeholder consensus stressed the importance of offsets registers with commensurate monitoring and enforcement. Our findings provide instructive insights into the countervailing views of offsets policy stakeholders.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Biodiversity; Business; Development projects; Environmental offsets; Management; Policy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27173891     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.04.054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  1 in total

1.  Megaproject Environmentally Responsible Behavior in China: A Test of the Theory of Planned Behavior.

Authors:  Linlin Xie; Mian Huang; Bo Xia; Martin Skitmore
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 4.614

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.