Lea Landolt1, Hans-Peter Marti1, Christian Beisland1,2, Arnar Flatberg3, Oystein Solberg Eikrem1. 1. a Department of Clinical Medicine , University of Bergen ; 2. b Department of Urology , Haukeland University Hospital , Bergen ; 3. c Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine , Norwegian University of Science and Technology , Trondheim , Norway.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Next generation sequencing (NGS) and especially ribonucleic acid (RNA) sequencing is a powerful tool to acquire insights into molecular disease mechanisms. Therefore, it is of interest to optimize methods for RNA extraction from archival, formalin fixed and paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissues. This is challenging due to RNA degradation and chemical modifications. The aim of this study was to find the most appropriate method to extract RNA from FFPE renal tissue to enable NGS. METHOD: We evaluated seven commercially available RNA extraction kits: High Pure FFPE RNA Isolation (Roche), ExpressArt Clear FFPE RNAready (Amsbio), miRNeasy FFPE, RNeasy FFPE (Qiagen), PureLink FFPE Total RNA (Invitrogen), RecoverAll Total Nucleic Acid Isolation (Ambion) and Absolutely RNA FFPE Kit (Agilent). RNA was obtained from tissue blocks of two healthy, male Wistar rats and from normal renal tissue of patients undergoing nephrectomy. Yield and quality of RNA extracted from rat whole kidney sections, human kidney core biopsies and laser capture microdissected (LCM) glomerular cross-sections were assessed: Analyses of RNA quantity were performed using NanoDrop and Qubit. RNA quality is reflected by DV200 values (% of RNA fragments >200 nucleotides) utilizing the Agilent 2100 BioAnalyzer. RNA of human LCM samples was subsequently sequenced using the Illumina TruSeq(®) RNA Access Library Preparation Kit. CONCLUSION: Total RNA can be extracted from archival renal biopsies in sufficient quality and quantity from one human kidney biopsy section and from around 100 LCM glomerular cross-sections to enable successful RNA library preparation and sequencing using commercially available RNA extraction kits.
BACKGROUND: Next generation sequencing (NGS) and especially ribonucleic acid (RNA) sequencing is a powerful tool to acquire insights into molecular disease mechanisms. Therefore, it is of interest to optimize methods for RNA extraction from archival, formalin fixed and paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissues. This is challenging due to RNA degradation and chemical modifications. The aim of this study was to find the most appropriate method to extract RNA from FFPE renal tissue to enable NGS. METHOD: We evaluated seven commercially available RNA extraction kits: High Pure FFPE RNA Isolation (Roche), ExpressArt Clear FFPE RNAready (Amsbio), miRNeasy FFPE, RNeasy FFPE (Qiagen), PureLink FFPE Total RNA (Invitrogen), RecoverAll Total Nucleic Acid Isolation (Ambion) and Absolutely RNA FFPE Kit (Agilent). RNA was obtained from tissue blocks of two healthy, male Wistar rats and from normal renal tissue of patients undergoing nephrectomy. Yield and quality of RNA extracted from rat whole kidney sections, human kidney core biopsies and laser capture microdissected (LCM) glomerular cross-sections were assessed: Analyses of RNA quantity were performed using NanoDrop and Qubit. RNA quality is reflected by DV200 values (% of RNA fragments >200 nucleotides) utilizing the Agilent 2100 BioAnalyzer. RNA of human LCM samples was subsequently sequenced using the Illumina TruSeq(®) RNA Access Library Preparation Kit. CONCLUSION: Total RNA can be extracted from archival renal biopsies in sufficient quality and quantity from one human kidney biopsy section and from around 100 LCM glomerular cross-sections to enable successful RNA library preparation and sequencing using commercially available RNA extraction kits.
Entities:
Keywords:
Formalin-fixed and paraffin embedded; RNA extraction; kidney biopsies; laser capture microdissection; next generation sequencing
Authors: Abigail Hay; Jean-Martin Lapointe; Arthur Lewis; Carol Moreno Quinn; Elena Miranda Journal: Histol Histopathol Date: 2019-06-11 Impact factor: 2.303
Authors: Chunyan Zhang; Lei Zhou; Kang Du; Ying Zhang; Jing Wang; Lijuan Chen; Yanning Lyu; Jun Li; Hao Liu; Junli Huo; Fei Li; Jiayi Wang; Peipei Sang; Si Lin; Yi Xiao; Kan Zhang; Kunlun He Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol Date: 2020-11-30 Impact factor: 5.293
Authors: Leah C Wehmas; Charles E Wood; Brian N Chorley; Carole L Yauk; Gail M Nelson; Susan D Hester Journal: Toxicol Sci Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Lea Landolt; Øystein Eikrem; Philipp Strauss; Andreas Scherer; David H Lovett; Christian Beisland; Kenneth Finne; Tarig Osman; Mohammad M Ibrahim; Gro Gausdal; Lavina Ahmed; James B Lorens; Jean Paul Thiery; Tuan Zea Tan; Miroslav Sekulic; Hans-Peter Marti Journal: Physiol Rep Date: 2017-06
Authors: Clemens L Bockmeyer; Juliane Wittig; Karen Säuberlich; Philipp Selhausen; Marc Eßer; Philip Zeuschner; Friedrich Modde; Kerstin Amann; Christoph Daniel Journal: BMC Mol Biol Date: 2018-03-13 Impact factor: 2.946
Authors: Isabella Wimmer; Anna R Tröscher; Florian Brunner; Stephen J Rubino; Christian G Bien; Howard L Weiner; Hans Lassmann; Jan Bauer Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-04-20 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Vivian Weiwen Xue; Simon Siu Man Ng; Wing Wa Leung; Brigette Buig Yue Ma; William Chi Shing Cho; Thomas Chi Chuen Au; Allen Chi Shing Yu; Hin Fung Andy Tsang; Sze Chuen Cesar Wong Journal: Front Genet Date: 2018-05-15 Impact factor: 4.599