Literature DB >> 27173656

Angry-happy interpretations of ambiguous faces in social anxiety disorder.

Keren Maoz1, Sharon Eldar1, Joel Stoddard2, Daniel S Pine3, Ellen Leibenluft2, Yair Bar-Haim4.   

Abstract

Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD) is characterized by a tendency to interpret ambiguous social cues as negative. Here we tested whether interpretation of ambiguous faces differs between participants with SAD and non-anxious controls. Twenty-seven individuals with SAD and 21 non-anxious control participants completed an emotion recognition task in which they judged ambiguous morphed faces as happy or angry. Participants with SAD judged a higher proportion of the faces as angry compared to non-anxious participants, and were slower to judge faces as angry compared to happy, while no such reaction time bias manifested in the control group. Finally, happy judgments were slower in the SAD group compared to the control group, while angry judgments were faster in the SAD group compared to the control group. These findings provide evidence for a negative bias in resolving emotional ambiguity in facial expressions among individuals with SAD.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ambiguous facial expressions; Anger; Emotion; Interpretation bias; Social phobia

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27173656     DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.04.100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry Res        ISSN: 0165-1781            Impact factor:   3.222


  8 in total

1.  Neural correlates of negative expectancy and impaired social feedback processing in social anxiety.

Authors:  Ruolei Gu; Xiang Ao; Licheng Mo; Dandan Zhang
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Mental disorders and the risk of adult violent and psychological victimisation: a prospective, population-based study.

Authors:  C Christ; M Ten Have; R de Graaf; D J F van Schaik; M J Kikkert; J J M Dekker; A T F Beekman
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 6.892

3.  Cognitive behavioural therapy attenuates the enhanced early facial stimuli processing in social anxiety disorders: an ERP investigation.

Authors:  Jianqin Cao; Quanying Liu; Yang Li; Jun Yang; Ruolei Gu; Jin Liang; Yanyan Qi; Haiyan Wu; Xun Liu
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 3.759

Review 4.  A Systematic Review of Experimental Paradigms for Exploring Biased Interpretation of Ambiguous Information with Emotional and Neutral Associations.

Authors:  Daniel E Schoth; Christina Liossi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-02-09

5.  Emotion recognition bias depends on stimulus morphing strategy.

Authors:  Anastasia Vikhanova; Isabelle Mareschal; Marc Tibber
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 2.157

6.  Individual differences in social intelligence and perception of emotion expression of masked and unmasked faces.

Authors:  Riley H Swain; Aminda J O'Hare; Kamila Brandley; A Tye Gardner
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-06-28

7.  Pediatric anxiety associated with altered facial emotion recognition.

Authors:  Lance M Rappaport; Nicole Di Nardo; Melissa A Brotman; Daniel S Pine; Ellen Leibenluft; Roxann Roberson-Nay; John M Hettema
Journal:  J Anxiety Disord       Date:  2021-06-07

8.  The Sexual OBjectification and EMotion database: A free stimulus set and norming data of sexually objectified and non-objectified female targets expressing multiple emotions.

Authors:  Daniela Ruzzante; Bianca Monachesi; Noemi Orabona; Jeroen Vaes
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-07-21
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.