Kypros Kypri1, Amanda Wilson1, John Attia1, Paschal Sheeran2, Peter Miller3, Jim McCambridge4. 1. Centre for Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia. 2. Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 3. School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia. 4. Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate reporting of alcohol consumption, we manipulated the contexts of questions in ways designed to induce social desirability bias. METHOD: We undertook a two-arm, parallel-group, individually randomized trial at an Australian public university. Students were recruited by email to a web-based "Research Project on Student Health Behavior." Respondents answered nine questions about their physical activity, diet, and smoking. They were unknowingly randomized to a group presented with either (A) three questions about their alcohol consumption or (B) seven questions about their alcohol dependence and problems (under a prominent header labeled "Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test"), followed by the same three alcohol consumption questions from (A). RESULTS: A total of 3,594 students (mean age = 27, SD = 10) responded and were randomized: 1,778 to Group A and 1,816 to Group B. Outcome measures were the number of days they drank alcohol, the typical number of drinks they consumed per drinking day, and the number of days they consumed six or more drinks. The primary analysis included participants with any alcohol consumption in the preceding 4 weeks (1,304 in Group A; 1,340 in Group B) using between-group, two-tailed t tests. RESULTS: In Groups A and B, respectively, means (and SDs) of the number of days drinking were 5.89 (5.92) versus 6.06 (6.12), p = .49; typical number of drinks per drinking day: 4.02 (3.87) versus 3.82 (3.76), p = .17; and number of days consuming six or more drinks: 1.69 (2.94) versus 1.67 (3.25), p = .56. CONCLUSIONS: We could not reject the null hypothesis because earlier questions about alcohol dependence and problems showed no sign of biasing the respondents' subsequent reports of alcohol consumption. These data support the validity of university students' reporting of alcohol consumption in web-based studies.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To investigate reporting of alcohol consumption, we manipulated the contexts of questions in ways designed to induce social desirability bias. METHOD: We undertook a two-arm, parallel-group, individually randomized trial at an Australian public university. Students were recruited by email to a web-based "Research Project on Student Health Behavior." Respondents answered nine questions about their physical activity, diet, and smoking. They were unknowingly randomized to a group presented with either (A) three questions about their alcohol consumption or (B) seven questions about their alcohol dependence and problems (under a prominent header labeled "Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test"), followed by the same three alcohol consumption questions from (A). RESULTS: A total of 3,594 students (mean age = 27, SD = 10) responded and were randomized: 1,778 to Group A and 1,816 to Group B. Outcome measures were the number of days they drank alcohol, the typical number of drinks they consumed per drinking day, and the number of days they consumed six or more drinks. The primary analysis included participants with any alcohol consumption in the preceding 4 weeks (1,304 in Group A; 1,340 in Group B) using between-group, two-tailed t tests. RESULTS: In Groups A and B, respectively, means (and SDs) of the number of days drinking were 5.89 (5.92) versus 6.06 (6.12), p = .49; typical number of drinks per drinking day: 4.02 (3.87) versus 3.82 (3.76), p = .17; and number of days consuming six or more drinks: 1.69 (2.94) versus 1.67 (3.25), p = .56. CONCLUSIONS: We could not reject the null hypothesis because earlier questions about alcohol dependence and problems showed no sign of biasing the respondents' subsequent reports of alcohol consumption. These data support the validity of university students' reporting of alcohol consumption in web-based studies.
Authors: Helene R White; Jason R Kilmer; Nicole Fossos-Wong; Kerri Hayes; Alexander W Sokolovsky; Kristina M Jackson Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2019-05-28 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Brittney A Hultgren; Rob Turrisi; Michael J Cleveland; Kimberly A Mallett; Racheal Reavy; Mary E Larimer; Irene M Geisner; Michelle M Hospital Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2018-12-19 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Dan I Lubman; Jasmin Grigg; John Reynolds; Kate Hall; Amanda L Baker; Petra K Staiger; Jonathan Tyler; Isabelle Volpe; Peta Stragalinos; Anthony Harris; David Best; Victoria Manning Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2022-09-21 Impact factor: 25.911
Authors: I M Geisner; J Koopmann; P Bamberger; M Wang; M E Larimer; I Nahum-Shani; S Bacharach Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2017-09-28 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Jason R Kilmer; Nicole Fossos-Wong; Irene M Geisner; Jih-Cheng Yeh; Mary E Larimer; M Dolores Cimini; Kathryn B Vincent; Hannah K Allen; Angelica L Barrall; Amelia M Arria Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2021-03-26 Impact factor: 2.164
Authors: Abhijit Nadkarni; Benedict Weobong; Helen A Weiss; Jim McCambridge; Bhargav Bhat; Basavaraj Katti; Pratima Murthy; Michael King; David McDaid; A-La Park; G Terence Wilson; Betty Kirkwood; Christopher G Fairburn; Richard Velleman; Vikram Patel Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-12-15 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jenny H Humphreys; Alexander Warner; Ruth Costello; Mark Lunt; Suzanne M M Verstappen; William G Dixon Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2017-03-23 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Eileen Fs Kaner; Fiona R Beyer; Colin Muirhead; Fiona Campbell; Elizabeth D Pienaar; Nicolas Bertholet; Jean B Daeppen; John B Saunders; Bernard Burnand Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-02-24
Authors: Abhijit Nadkarni; Helen A Weiss; Benedict Weobong; David McDaid; Daisy R Singla; A-La Park; Bhargav Bhat; Basavaraj Katti; Jim McCambridge; Pratima Murthy; Michael King; G Terence Wilson; Betty Kirkwood; Christopher G Fairburn; Richard Velleman; Vikram Patel Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2017-09-12 Impact factor: 11.069