Literature DB >> 27172365

Patient Satisfaction and Functional Outcomes Following Secondary Patellar Resurfacing.

Hans-Peter W van Jonbergen, Ashvin V Boeddha, Jos J A M van Raaij.   

Abstract

When secondary patellar resurfacing is performed, a uniformly and widely used scoring system that is validated for anterior knee pain caused by a retropatellar degeneration will give more insight into the results of this procedure. The cause of anterior knee pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is not always related to the patella itself. Other causes have been identified, such as an insufficient posterior cruciate ligament in the case of a posterior cruciate-retaining TKA or an internally rotated femoral and/or tibial component. Treatment of anterior knee pain following primary TKA with secondary patellar resurfacing is a controversial procedure with uncertain outcomes. The purpose of this study is to systematically review the available peer-reviewed literature on patient satisfaction and functional outcomes of secondary resurfacing. The authors performed a systematic computerized database search of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, and EMBASE in October 2014. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. A total of 15 articles met the inclusion criteria. In total, 148 (64%) of 232 patients were satisfied with the outcomes of secondary patellar resurfacing. A statistically significant improvement in knee scores was noted in all 9 studies that reported functional outcomes, although no clinically significant improvement in knee scores was observed. Reported complications include infections and impaired wound healing, patellar instability, and patellar fracture. Because the available evidence is of generally low quality, the results of this systematic review only support a weak recommendation for secondary patellar resurfacing if patient satisfaction and clinically important improvement of functional outcomes are the desired endpoints. [Orthopedics.2016; 39(5):e850-e856.]. Copyright 2016, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27172365     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20160509-05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  4 in total

1.  Have the Causes of Revision for Total and Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties Changed During the Past Two Decades?

Authors:  Gro S Dyrhovden; Stein Håkon L Lygre; Mona Badawy; Øystein Gøthesen; Ove Furnes
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Effect of patella resurfacing on functional outcome and revision rate in primary total knee arthroplasty (Review).

Authors:  Sorin Radu Fleaca; Cosmin Ioan Mohor; Horatiu Dura; Radu Chicea; Calin Mohor; Adrian Boicean; Mihai Dan Roman
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Good Outcomes of Combined Femoral Derotation Osteotomy and Medial Retinaculum Plasty in Patients with Recurrent Patellar Dislocation.

Authors:  Guang-Min Yang; Yan-Yang Wang; Li-Xiong Zuo; Fa-Quan Li; Yi-Ke Dai; Fei Wang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 2.071

Review 4.  Patellar resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Kai Chen; Xiaoyu Dai; Lidong Li; Zhigang Chen; Haidong Cui; Shujun Lv
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 2.359

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.