Elizabeth Prsic1, Mike Plotzke2, Thomas J Christian2, Pedro Gozalo3, Joan M Teno4. 1. 1 Department of Oncology, Brown Medical School , Providence, Rhode Island. 2. 2 Abt Associates , Boston, Massachusetts. 3. 3 School of Public Health, Brown University , Providence, Rhode Island. 4. 4 Division of Gerontology and Geriatrics, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Live hospice discharges represent a potential vulnerability in the Medicare hospice benefit. Little is known about how live discharges have varied over time. OBJECTIVE: To identify trends in live hospice discharges between 2000 and 2012. DESIGN, SETTING, PATIENTS: Retrospective cohort study of Medicare hospice discharges. MEASUREMENTS: In this study, we examined live discharges in the first six months of 2000, 2006, 2008, 2010, and 2012. A live discharge was classified as a burdensome transition if hospice discharge was followed by hospital admission, and then there was a hospice readmission within 2 days of hospital discharge. The adjusted rate of overall live discharges and burdensome transitions was examined with a multivariate mixed-effects logistic model that adjusted for age, gender, race, and hospice primary diagnosis. The model contained an interaction term for year and hospice tax status. RESULTS: The unadjusted overall rate of live discharges increased from 13.7% in 2000 to 18.1% in 2012. For-profit hospice programs had an adjusted live discharge rate of 17.7% in 2000 and 22.7% in 2012. During the same period, the adjusted live discharge rate for nonprofit hospice programs increased from 15.2% to 16.3%. The overall rate of burdensome transitions increased from 2.9% in 2000 to 5.3% in 2012. Similar to the overall rate of live discharge, for-profit hospices had a higher rate of burdensome transitions (6.4%) than nonprofit hospices (4.0%) in 2012. CONCLUSIONS: Live hospice discharges and burdensome transitions increased between 2000 and 2012. For-profit hospice programs demonstrated larger increases than nonprofit hospice programs.
BACKGROUND: Live hospice discharges represent a potential vulnerability in the Medicare hospice benefit. Little is known about how live discharges have varied over time. OBJECTIVE: To identify trends in live hospice discharges between 2000 and 2012. DESIGN, SETTING, PATIENTS: Retrospective cohort study of Medicare hospice discharges. MEASUREMENTS: In this study, we examined live discharges in the first six months of 2000, 2006, 2008, 2010, and 2012. A live discharge was classified as a burdensome transition if hospice discharge was followed by hospital admission, and then there was a hospice readmission within 2 days of hospital discharge. The adjusted rate of overall live discharges and burdensome transitions was examined with a multivariate mixed-effects logistic model that adjusted for age, gender, race, and hospice primary diagnosis. The model contained an interaction term for year and hospice tax status. RESULTS: The unadjusted overall rate of live discharges increased from 13.7% in 2000 to 18.1% in 2012. For-profit hospice programs had an adjusted live discharge rate of 17.7% in 2000 and 22.7% in 2012. During the same period, the adjusted live discharge rate for nonprofit hospice programs increased from 15.2% to 16.3%. The overall rate of burdensome transitions increased from 2.9% in 2000 to 5.3% in 2012. Similar to the overall rate of live discharge, for-profit hospices had a higher rate of burdensome transitions (6.4%) than nonprofit hospices (4.0%) in 2012. CONCLUSIONS: Live hospice discharges and burdensome transitions increased between 2000 and 2012. For-profit hospice programs demonstrated larger increases than nonprofit hospice programs.
Authors: Sulaiman Alshakhs; Elisabeth Sweet; Elizabeth Luth; M C Reid; Charles R Henderson; Veerawat Phongtankuel Journal: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Date: 2022-04-20 Impact factor: 2.090
Authors: Elizabeth A Luth; David J Russell; Abraham A Brody; Ritchell Dignam; Sara J Czaja; Miriam Ryvicker; Kathryn H Bowles; Holly G Prigerson Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2019-11-21 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Margaret F Clayton; Rebecca Utz; Eli Iacob; Gail L Towsley; Jacqueline Eaton; Hollie J Fuhrmann; Kara Dassel; Michael Caserta; Katherine Supiano Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2021-01-05
Authors: Krista L Harrison; Theresa A Allison; Sarah B Garrett; Nicole Thompson; Rebecca L Sudore; Christine S Ritchie Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2020-03-04 Impact factor: 2.947