Literature DB >> 27171508

Efficacy and safety of alogliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A multicentre randomized double-blind placebo-controlled Phase 3 study in mainland China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong.

Changyu Pan1, Ping Han2, Qiuhe Ji3, Chengjiang Li4, Juming Lu1, Jinkui Yang5, Wenhui Li6, Jiaoe Zeng7, An-Tsz Hsieh8, Juliana Chan9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study determined the efficacy and safety of once-daily oral alogliptin in patients from mainland China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
METHODS: In this Phase 3 multicenter double-blind placebo-controlled 16-week trial, 506 patients were randomized to receive once-daily alogliptin 25 mg or placebo: 185 in the monotherapy group, 197 in the add-on to metformin group, and 124 in the add-on to pioglitazone group. The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline (CFB) in HbA1c at Week 16; other efficacy measures included CFB to Week 16 in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), incidence of marked hyperglycemia (FPG ≥11.1 mmol/L), and the incidence of clinical HbA1c ≤6.5 % (48 mmol/mol) and ≤7.0 % (53 mmol/mol) at Week 16. Safety was assessed throughout the trial.
RESULTS: Alogliptin monotherapy provided a significantly greater decrease in HbA1c from baseline to Week 16 compared with placebo (-0.58 %; 95 % confidence interval [CI] -0.78 %, -0.37 %; P < 0.001). As an add-on to metformin or pioglitazone, alogliptin also significantly decreased HbA1c compared with placebo (-0.69 % [95 % CI -0.87 %, -0.51 %; P < 0.001] and -0.52 % [95 % CI -0.75 %, -0.28 %; P < 0.001], respectively). In any treatment group versus placebo, alogliptin led to greater decreases in FPG (P ≤ 0.004) and a higher percentage of patients who achieved an HbA1c target of ≤6.5 % and ≤7.0 % (P ≤ 0.003). No weight gain was observed in any treatment group. A similar percentage of patients experienced drug-related, treatment-emergent adverse events in the alogliptin and placebo arms. Four and two patients in the alogliptin and placebo arms, respectively, experienced mild or moderate hypoglycemia.
CONCLUSIONS: Alogliptin 25 mg once daily reduced HbA1c and FPG and enhanced clinical response compared with placebo when used as monotherapy or as an add-on to metformin or pioglitazone. Therapy with alogliptin was well tolerated.
© 2016 The Authors. Journal of Diabetes published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd and Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2型糖尿病; Asian; HbA1c; alogliptin; type 2 diabetes mellitus; 亚洲; 阿格列汀

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27171508     DOI: 10.1111/1753-0407.12425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes        ISSN: 1753-0407            Impact factor:   4.006


  9 in total

Review 1.  Factors Related to the Glucose-Lowering Efficacy of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Focusing on Ethnicity and Study Regions.

Authors:  Kayo Fujita; Masayuki Kaneko; Mamoru Narukawa
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.859

2.  Genome-Wide Transcriptome Analysis in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Treated by Sitagliptin.

Authors:  Rui Ma; Xiao-Long Deng; Qi-Qi-Ge Aleteng; Lei Li; Jun Zhu
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 3.249

3.  Efficacy and safety of fixed-dose combination therapy, alogliptin plus metformin, in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes: A phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Linong Ji; Ling Li; Jian Kuang; Tao Yang; Dong-Jun Kim; Azidah A Kadir; Chien-Ning Huang; Douglas Lee
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 6.577

4.  Ethnic Differences in Efficacy and Safety of Alogliptin: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yuli Cai; Tianshu Zeng; Zhongyuan Wen; Lulu Chen
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 2.945

Review 5.  Practical strategies for improving outcomes in T2DM: The potential role of pioglitazone and DPP4 inhibitors.

Authors:  Stefano Del Prato; Robert Chilton
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 6.577

6.  Risk of any hypoglycaemia with newer antihyperglycaemic agents in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sanaz Kamalinia; Robert G Josse; Patrick J Donio; Lindsay Leduc; Baiju R Shah; Sheldon W Tobe
Journal:  Endocrinol Diabetes Metab       Date:  2019-11-13

7.  Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and gallbladder or biliary disease in type 2 diabetes: systematic review and pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Liyun He; Jialu Wang; Fan Ping; Na Yang; Jingyue Huang; Wei Li; Lingling Xu; Huabing Zhang; Yuxiu Li
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2022-06-28

Review 8.  Benefit-Risk Assessment of Alogliptin for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Kohei Kaku; Koichi Kisanuki; Mari Shibata; Takashi Oohira
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 5.606

9.  Age, sex, disease severity, and disease duration difference in placebo response: implications from a meta-analysis of diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Chu Lin; Xiaoling Cai; Wenjia Yang; Fang Lv; Lin Nie; Linong Ji
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 8.775

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.