| Literature DB >> 27171475 |
Daibin Zhong1, Xiaoming Wang1,2, Tielong Xu3, Guofa Zhou1, Ying Wang4, Ming-Chieh Lee1, Joshua A Hartsel1, Liwang Cui5, Bin Zheng3, Guiyun Yan1.
Abstract
In the past decade, developing countries have been experiencing rapid land use and land cover changes, including deforestation and cultivation of previously forested land. However, little is known about the impact of deforestation and land-use changes on the life history of malaria vectors and their effects on malaria transmission. This study examined the effects of deforestation and crop cultivation on the adult survivorship of major malaria mosquitoes, Anopheles sinensis and An. minimus in the China-Myanmar border region. We examined three conditions: indoor, forested, and banana plantation. Mean survival time of An. sinensis in banana plantation environment was significantly longer than those in forested environment, and mosquitoes exhibited the longest longevity in the indoor environment. This pattern held for both males and females, and also for An. minimus. To further test the effect of temperature on mosquito survival, we used two study sites with different elevation and ambient temperatures. Significantly higher survivorship of both species was found in sites with lower elevation and higher ambient temperature. Increased vector survival in the deforested area could have an important impact on malaria transmission in Southeast Asia. Understanding how deforestation impacts vector survivorship can help combat malaria transmission.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27171475 PMCID: PMC4865052 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155301
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Study area and sampling sites in the China-Myanmar border region.
Composition of Anopheles adult mosquito rearing from larvae collected in China-Myanmar border region.
| 2,091 | 1,815 | 3,906 | 50.49 | |
| 894 | 770 | 1,664 | 21.51 | |
| 477 | 360 | 837 | 10.82 | |
| 300 | 186 | 486 | 6.28 | |
| 168 | 69 | 237 | 3.06 | |
| 87 | 96 | 183 | 2.37 | |
| 42 | 56 | 98 | 1.27 | |
| 42 | 36 | 78 | 1.01 | |
| 42 | 33 | 75 | 0.97 | |
| 25 | 21 | 46 | 0.59 | |
| 20 | 15 | 35 | 0.45 | |
| 21 | 10 | 31 | 0.40 | |
| 14 | 6 | 20 | 0.26 | |
| 10 | 8 | 18 | 0.23 | |
| 6 | 6 | 12 | 0.16 | |
| 3 | 1 | 4 | 0.05 | |
| 2 | 1 | 3 | 0.04 | |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.04 | |
| Total | 4,245 | 3,491 | 7,736 | 100 |
Fig 2Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.
Impact of land use and land cover on survivorship of Anopheles minimus (top panel) and An. sinensis (bottom panel) adult mosquitoes. Three land use and land cover types were tested: indoor, banana planation and forest.
Comparisons of mean and median survivorship of Anopheles minimus and An. sinensis adults in different land use and land cover conditions.
Values are shown as mean ± standard deviation.
| Species | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study site | Forest | Plantation | Indoor | Forest | Plantation | Indoor |
| Mean±Standard deviation | 14.8±1.1A | 18.8±1.5 A | 21.6±2.6 B | 15.0±1.3A | 19.0±1.3 B | 22.7±1.4 C |
| Median (95% confidence interval) | 16 (14–17) | 19 (15–20) | 21 (18–23) | 15 (14–16) | 18 (16–19) | 21 (19–22) |
| Mean±Standard deviation | 11.2±1.3 A | 13.8±1.9 AB | 15.9±1.5 B | 14.1±1.6 A | 16.2±1.7 AB | 19.1±2.4 B |
| Median (95% confidence interval) | 9 (8–12) | 13 (11–16) | 16 (13–18) | 14 (14–15) | 15 (15–16) | 17 (17–20) |
| Mean±Standard deviation | 88.2±14.6 A | 90.2±13.0 a | 91.1±13.2 A | 87.9±13.9 A | 88.1±14.9 A | 91.4±10.5 A |
| Mean±Standard deviation | 85.6±16.2 A | 87.1±13.3 a | 88.7±16.3 A | 83.6±16.9 A | 87.4±14.3 A | 89.4±12.0 A |
* Values marked by different letters (A, B, and C) within the same row, for the same species, are significantly different at a level of 0.05 (Tukey-Kramer HSD test).
Microclimate condition of mosquito niches tested in different land use and land cover conditions from May to July in 2014, in China-Myanmar border region.
Values are shown as mean ± standard deviation.
| Environment | Forest | Plantation | Indoor | F | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean temperature (°C) | 27.1±2.1A | 28.1±3.0 AB | 29.2±2.6 B | 3.94 | 0.0241 |
| Mean relative humidity (%) | 83.9±8.7 A | 82.7±5.3 A | 86.3±2.8 A | 1.78 | 0.1763 |
| Mean light intensity (lum/ft2) | 175.0±112.0 A | 319.8±202.6 B | 53.8±28.4 C | 12.7 | <0.0001 |
| Mean maximum temperature (°C) | 31.8±4.0 A | 30.1±2.2 AB | 29.9±1.2 C | 3.71 | 0.0294 |
| Mean minimum temperature (°C) | 23.8±1.5 A | 24.3±0.4 B | 26.9±0.6 B | 70.0 | <0.0001 |
| Mean maximum relative humidity (%) | 99.7±0.8 A | 93.7±2.0 B | 92.6±0.8 B | 197.3 | <0.0001 |
| Mean minimum relative humidity (%) | 54.9±13.5 A | 71.1±6.2 B | 77.4±1.5 C | 43.2 | <0.0001 |
| Mean maximum light intensity (lum/ft2) | 238.8±144.7 A | 524.1±61.5 B | 66.1±29.5 C | 14.1 | 0.0017 |
| Mean minimum light intensity (lum/ft2) | 18.7±5.3 A | 22.5±2.9 A | 4.2±2.5 B | 25.4 | 0.0002 |
* Values marked by different letters (A, B, and C) within the same row are significantly different at a level of 0.05 (Tukey-Kramer HSD test).
Fig 3Daily dynamics of microclimatic conditions.
Dynamics of hourly indoor temperature (A), relative humidity (B) and light intensity (C) under three land use and land cover conditions.
Indoor climate condition in sites with different elevations in China-Myanmar border region.
Values are shown as mean ± standard deviation.
| Study site | Daonong (660 m) | Nabang (240 m) | F | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean temperature (°C) | 26.2±1.5 A | 29.3±2.3 B | 29.5 | <0.0001 |
| Mean relative humidity (%) | 78.6±3.9 A | 77.6±7.6 B | 0.36 | 0.5491 |
| Mean maximum temperature (°C) | 31.1±3.2 A | 34.7±2.7 B | 16.2 | 0.0002 |
| Mean minimum temperature (°C) | 23.2±0.4 A | 25.8±0.8 B | 197.9 | <0.0001 |
| Mean maximum relative humidity (%) | 93.2±1.8 A | 92.4±2.3 A | 1.7 | 0.1899 |
| Mean minimum relative humidity (%) | 48.3±7.9 A | 51.6±11.8 A | 1.3 | 0.2631 |
* Values marked by different letters within the same row are significantly different at a level of 0.05 (Tukey-Kramer HSD test).
Fig 4Life table survival analysis.
Survivorship of Anopheles minimus (A) and An. sinensis (B) in two study sites differing in ambient temperature along the China-Myanmar border region.
Mean and median survivorship of Anopheles minimus and An. sinensis adults in indoor conditions in two sites with different elevations.
Values are shown as mean ± standard deviation.
| Species | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study site | Daonong (660 m) | Nabang (240 m) | Daonong (660 m) | Nabang (240 m) |
| Mean ± Standard deviation | 11.7 ± 1.7 A | 15.5 ± 0.7 B | 11.1 ± 1.1 A | 14.7 ± 0.7 B |
| Median (95% confidence interval) | 11 (10–12) | 16 (14–17) | 10 (9–11) | 13 (12–14) |
| Mean ± Standard deviation | 11.0 ± 0.8 A | 11.1 ± 0.4 B | 8.7 ± 1.0 A | 11.7 ± 1.3 B |
| Median (95% confidence interval) | 10 (8–12) | 11 (9–12) | 7 (7–9) | 9 (8–12) |
| Mean ± Standard deviation | 85.3 ± 19.0 A | 91.9 ± 8.7 A | 89.5 ± 12.1A | 85.0 ± 17.5 A |
| Mean ± Standard deviation | 89.1 ± 15.1 A | 90.2 ± 7.8 A | 87.5 ± 18.5 A | 89.7 ± 12.1 A |
* Values marked by different letters within the same row, for the same species, are significantly different at a level of 0.05 (Tukey-Kramer HSD test).