Literature DB >> 27171383

Association of Plasma Transforming Growth Factor-β1 Levels and the Risk of Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis.

Jiao Li1, Yajuan Yang1, Chee Yuan Ng2, Zhiwei Zhang1, Tong Liu1, Guangping Li1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Numerous studies have demonstrated that plasma transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) may be involved in the pathogenesis of atrial fibrillation (AF), but some discrepancy remained. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the association between the plasma level of TGF-β1 and the risk of AF.
METHODS: Published clinical studies evaluating the association between the plasma level of TGF-β1 and the risk of AF were retrieved from PubMed and EMBASE databases. Two reviewers independently evaluated the quality of the included studies and extracted study data. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed to evaluate for heterogeneity between studies.
RESULTS: Of the 395 studies identified initially, 13 studies were included into our analysis, with a total of 3354 patients. Higher plasma level of TGF-β1 was associated with increased risk of AF when evaluated as both a continuous variable (SMD 0.67; 95%CI 0.29-1.05) and a categorical variable (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.01-1.02).
CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests an association between elevated plasma TGF-β1 and new onset AF. Additional studies with larger sample sizes are needed to further investigate the relationship between plasma TGF-β1 and the occurrence of AF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27171383      PMCID: PMC4865111          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia with debilitating consequences such as stroke and heart failure. It is also associated with an increase in overall mortality [1,2,3]. Animal models and studies on patients with AF have confirmed that the development of AF is associated with both structural and electrical remodeling of the atria [4]. Patients with chronic AF have significant myocardial interstitial fibrosis which contributes to the occurrence and perpetuation of AF [5, 6]. Transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) is an important factor in fibrosis [7]. It is involved in the process of cell proliferation, apoptosis and migration. It promotes the differentiation of cardiac fibroblasts and production of extracellular matrix such as collagen, fibronectin, and protein polysaccharide which leads to cardiac fibrosis [8]. In transgenic mouse models, the activation of TGF-β1 promotes atrial fibrosis and the development of AF [9]. On the other hand, the inhibition of TGF-β1 by pirfenidone (PFD) can significantly reduce the extent of atrial fibrosis [10]. These findings have prompted clinical studies on the relationship between plasma TGF-β1 levels and the development of AF in humans. However, the results generated have been inconsistent. Therefore, we conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis to evaluate the available evidence of whether high plasma TGF-β1 levels are related to the risk of having AF.

Methods

Search strategy

Articles were identified by searching PubMed and Embase online databases for articles published up until November 2015. The key terms used are ‘TGF-β1’, ‘transforming growth factor-β1’, ‘transforming growth factor-beta1’, ‘transforming growth factor’ and ‘atrial fibrillation’. We manually searched the bibliographies of original papers and abstracts of the scientific sessions of the past 3 years. In addition, we sought the assistance from potential experts in the field to assess the quality of included articles. We evaluated the titles, abstracts and reference lists of all articles to identify potentially relevant studies.

Trial selection and inclusion criteria

Two reviewers (J. L. and Y. Y.) evaluated the titles and abstracts of all eligible studies. The full text of relevant studies was retrieved and assessed accordingly based on the inclusion criteria. Any disagreements on whether to include any study between the two investigators were resolved through joint review and discussions. For inclusion, eligible trials should meet the following criteria: (1) the study design was case-control, prospective or retrospective cohort studies; (2) human subjects; (3) included the characteristics of study patients; (4) clearly defined endpoint events, such as AF occurrence or recurrence; (5) evaluated the plasma TGF-β1 levels of AF patients and non-AF patients; (6) reported the plasma level of TGF-β1 using [mean ± standard deviation (SD)] and odds ratio (OR) or hazard ratio (HR) of AF incidence and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for TGF-β1 levels.

Data extraction

Two independent reviewers (J. L. and Y. Y.) extracted data from included studies using a standard data extraction form. Information on authors and published journals were removed and then independently evaluated according to the described inclusion criteria. Relevant data were extracted from the manuscripts. We extracted and analyzed the plasma concentration of TGF-β1 expressed as mean ± SD from each primary study. Adjusted OR values were selected for the analysis. Additional data collected included study characteristics (first author’s last name, publication year, study design, sample size, AF definition, follow-up duration, end-point events) and patients baseline characteristics (age, sex, BMI, smoking, mean left atria diameter, left ventricular ejection fraction, the presence of CAD, hypertension, diabetes and medication).

Quality assessment

The two investigators (J. L. and Y. Y.) independently evaluated the quality of the eligible studies based on the guidelines by the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group [11] and the United States Preventive Task Force [12]. Each study was judged in accordance to the 10-item STROBE checklist. We appraised the quality of studies according to the following characteristics: (1) the inclusion and exclusion criteria are clearly defined; (2) sample selection is clearly described; (3) involved population is representative of study sample; (4) the patients’ follow-up period is adequate; (5) reports loss of follow-up; (6) clinical and demographic variables are complete; (7) the definition of AF is clearly defined; (8) the outcomes and outcome assessment are clearly defined; (9) temporality (evaluation of plasma TGF-β1 levels at baseline) and (10) adjustment of possible confounders on the multivariate analysis, especially for categorical variable. If any of the characteristics was not described, we assumed that it had not been performed.

Statistical analysis

All continuous variables were presented as (mean ± SD). The standard mean difference (SMD) was used to analyze the results in our meta-analysis. SMD method was used as different unit of measurements were presented for TGF-β1 levels. As the studies included in this meta-analysis may have used either a continuous or categorical variable for TGF-β1 levels, we performed a separate meta-analysis for both types of variables to evaluate the association between TGF-β1 levels and the occurrence of AF. The HR values in multivariate Cox proportional hazards model in each primary study were directly considered as OR values. I2 derived from the chi-square test was used to evaluate the heterogeneity across the studies included. I2 of ≤50% indicates that there was no significant heterogeneity [13]. A fixed effects model was used if no significant heterogeneity was found. When pooled effect resulted in significant heterogeneity, the random effects model was used. We conducted random effects meta-analysis using the inverse variance heterogeneity method. In addition, we also performed subgroup analysis based on the patients’ age (≤50y or >50y), study design (cohort study or case control study), duration of follow-up (<12 months or ≥12 months), sample size (<100 or ≥100) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (<50% or ≥50%). Sensitivity analysis was performed by sequentially removing each individual study. We assessed for publication bias by constructing a funnel plot. Two-tailed p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed with Review Manager Version 5.3.

Results

Search results

Data retrieval and study selection was shown in the flow chart (Fig 1). A total of 395 studies were found using our search criteria. After reviewing title and abstract of each study, we excluded 356 articles because they were either unrelated, review articles or basic science research papers. Then, we evaluated the remaining 39 studies in detail. Of these 39 studies, we excluded 26 studies because: 1 had duplicate data, 17 did not provide the plasma TGF-β1 levels, 6 did not provide (mean ± SD) data of TGF-β1 or OR/HR values, 1 did not provide baseline characteristics of patients and 1 had no control group. Finally, the remaining 13 studies were included into our meta-analysis.
Fig 1

Flow chart of study selection.

SD, standard deviation.

Flow chart of study selection.

SD, standard deviation.

Study characteristics

We included 13 studies with a total of 3354 patients of which 1154 patients have AF and 2200 patients have no AF. The main features of the studies are exhibited in Table 1, and the patients’ baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 2. Confounding factors used in multivariate analysis are shown in Table 3. Out of the 13 included studies, 6 studies[14-19] demonstrated that AF patients had higher plasma TGF-β1 levels, regardless of whether it was new-onset AF or recurrent AF, but the remaining 7[20-26] presented no significant correlation between plasma TGF-β1 levels and occurrence of AF. 12[14-26] studies in which the plasma TGF-β1 levels was expressed as (mean ± SD) were analyzed using TGF- β1 as a continuous variable. 4[15, 19, 25, 26] studies with OR/HR values in which the plasma TGF-β1 levels was analyzed as a categorical variable had been included in a separate analysis. Of the 13 included studies, 3 studies [15, 19, 25] analyzed TGF-β1 levels as both a continuous variable and categorical variable.
Table 1

General data of studies included in meta-analysis.

Investigator (year)LocationPatients number (n)Study populationDesign typeMean follow-upEndpointDuration of AFQuality score
Wang 2010China540Patients who were newly diagnosed essential hypertensive and none of them received anti-hypertensive treatment.Case control studyDuring hospitalizationThe occurrence of AF was determined by 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG) and/or 24-h Holter monitoring.NA7
Wu 2013Taiwan46Nonparoxysmal AF patients who underwent catheter ablation.Cohort study10.9 ± 7.4 monthsThe clinically documented recurrence of atrial arrhythmias or repeat ablation procedures. An AF recurrence was defined as an episode lasting >1 minute and was confirmed by ECG 3 months after the ablation.71.3±58.1 months9
On 2009Korea76Patients who underwent both the open heart operation for mitral valvular heart disease and the surgical maze procedure for AF.Cohort study12 monthsThe primary end point of the study was the persistence of AF after the maze procedure with cryoablation.3.4 years8
Xiao 2010China38Patients with RHD who underwent valve replacement surgery.Case control studyDuring hospitalizationThe occurrence of AF. The patients were divided into 3 groups: the sinus rhythm group, the paroxysmal AF group, and the chronic AF group (AF lasting ≥6 months).NA7
Zhao 2014China90VHD patients, comprising pathological changes in the mitral or aortic valves, or both, who underwent valve replacement surgeryCase control studyDuring hospitalizationThe occurrence of AF. (Persistent AF:AF lasting >6 month and paroxysmal AF: recurrent AF that terminated spontaneously in <7 days.)NA7
Kim 2009Korea74Patients with persistent AF who underwent external electrical cardioversion.Cohort study13.2 ± 11.0 monthsAF recurrence after successful cardioversion.NA8
Mira 2013China80Patients with AF.Case control studyDuring hospitalizationThe occurrence of AF. Patients were divided into paroxysmal AF group and persistent AF group according to whether they could convert to sinus rhythm spontaneously.NA7
Lin 2015China112Patients with a history of essential hypertensive.Case control studyDuring hospitalizationAF was determined by 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG) and/or 24-h Holter monitoring. Persistent AF: AF lasting >6 month.13.12±9.96 years7
Kimura 2014Japan44AF patients who received an initial catheter ablationCohort study9.7 ± 2.4 monthsAF recurrence was defined as a documented AF for more than 30 seconds after three months of a blanking-period.53±29 months8
Shim 2013Korea575Patients with AF who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation.Cohort study15 ± 7 monthsIf any ECG documented an AF episode within the three-month blanking period during follow-up, the patient was diagnosed with an early recurrence, and any AF recurrence thereafter was diagnosed with clinical recurrence.NA8
Smit 2012Netherland100Patients were included if they had short-lasting persistent AF, defined as a total AF history of, 2 years, a total persistent AF history of, 6 months, and ≤1 previous electrical cardioversion.Cohort study12 monthsThe primary endpoint consisted of early AF recurrence, defined as any (a)symptomatic recurrence of AF within the first month after cardioversion lasting ≥30s. Secondary endpoint was progression to permanent AF within 1 year.4.2 months9
Canpolat 2014Turkey41Lone paroxysmal AF patients who underwent preablation DE-MRI. Lone AF was defined in patients who were <60 years old; without structural heart disease based on patient history, physical examination, and imaging methods including chest X-ray and echocardiography; and no history of coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, or hypertension. Paroxysmal AF is defined as self-terminating episode, usually within 48 hours, that may continue for up to 7 days.Cohort study18 monthsRecurrence of AF is defined as detection of AF (at least 30 seconds duration when assessed with ECG monitoring) >3 months following AF ablation.60 months8
Rosenberg 2014America1538Participants were recruited for The Cardiovascular Health Study.Cohort study12 monthsThe occurrence of AF. (1) Annual outpatient study ECGs were interpreted by the EPICARE ECG reading center, where the diagnoses of AF or atrial flutter were verified; (2) hospital discharge diagnoses that included codes for AF and flutter were also included, although AF or flutter diagnoses that were made during the same hospitalization as coronary artery bypass surgery or heart valve surgery were not counted.NA9

AF = atrial fibrillation; RHD = rheumatic heart disease; VHD = valvular heart disease; CHF = congestive heart failure.

Table 2

Patients characteristics of included studies.

Investigator (year)Mean age (y)Male (%)BMI (kg/m2)Smoker (%)HTN (%)DM (%)CAD (%)Mean LAD (mm)Mean LVEF (%)Medication
β-blocker (%)ACEI/ARB (%)Statin (%)Amiodarone (%)
Wang 201045.9-25.856.110000--0000,
Wu 201352.891.326.2-28.32.22.244.654.6-23.94.326.1
On 200953.944.7-23.722.414.5-60.2-----
Xiao 201041.2 ± 9.1---0-050.652.9-0--
Zhao 201450.845---0-50.954.56558--
Kim 200958.67724.7-28.4--45.849.124.335.110.864.9
Mira 201349.557.5-----57.360.5-0--
Lin 201567.562.5-32.110021.4-38.561.60000
Kimura 201459 ± 8-23.2 ± 2.6----39 ± 671.9 ± 9.437.920.717.2-
Shim 201355.7 ± 10.977.724.8 ± 2.8-4410.3-41.4 ± 6.261.3 ± 8.30000
Smit 201265 ± 974.-6267141845 ± 619 ± 1389743812
Canpolat 201449.2 ± 7.658.527.1±5.231.700041.268.2±4.5---31.7
Rosenberg 201477.8 ± 4.637.9-9.256.316.8-------

BMI = body mass index; HNT = hypertension; DM = diabetes mellitus; CAD = coronary artery disease; LAD = left atrium diameter; LVEF = left ventricular ejectionfraction; ACEI = angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors; ARB = angiotensin receptor blocker.

Table 3

Confounding factors used in multivariate analysis.

Investigator (year)HR/OR95%CIP valueAdjustment
Canpolat 2014HR:1.013(Univariate model)1.010–1.0180.001NA
Smit 2012HR:1.21.0–1.50.04Left ventricular ejection fraction, and early AF recurrence.
Wu 2013OR:1.111.01–1.220.031Age, sex, body mass index, use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/ angiotensin II receptor blocker, left atrial diameter.
Rosenberg 2014HR:1.050.95–1.170.36Age, sex, race, clinic site, systolic blood pressure, hypertensive medications, body mass index, body mass index -squared, height, smoking status, history of CHF, MI, or prevalent diabetes.

HR = hazard ratio; OR, odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; NA = not available; AF = atrial fibrillation; CHF = congestive heart failure; MI = myocardial infarction.

AF = atrial fibrillation; RHD = rheumatic heart disease; VHD = valvular heart disease; CHF = congestive heart failure. BMI = body mass index; HNT = hypertension; DM = diabetes mellitus; CAD = coronary artery disease; LAD = left atrium diameter; LVEF = left ventricular ejectionfraction; ACEI = angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors; ARB = angiotensin receptor blocker. HR = hazard ratio; OR, odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; NA = not available; AF = atrial fibrillation; CHF = congestive heart failure; MI = myocardial infarction.

Main analysis

The pooled analysis of included studies showed that plasma TGF-β1 levels in the patients with AF was significantly higher than those without AF in both analyses; continuous variable (SMD 0.67; 95%CI 0.29–1.05) with significant heterogeneity across studies (I² = 91%, P<0.00001) (Fig 2) and categorical variable (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.01–1.02) with moderate heterogeneity across studies (I² = 62%, P = 0.05) (Fig 3). Patients with persistent AF had higher TGF-β1 levels than that in paroxysmal AF patients (SMD 0.57; 95%CI 0.22–0.92) without significant heterogeneity (I² = 30%, P = 0.23) across studies (Fig 4).
Fig 2

Forest plot of the association between the plasma level of TGF-β1 and AF occurrence depending on different study population in which TGF-β1 levels were analyzed as continuous variable.

AF, atrial fibrillation; CI, confidence interval; SD, standard deviation.

Fig 3

Forest plot of the association between the plasma level of TGF-β1 and AF occurrence in which TGF-β1 levels were analyzed as a categorical variable.

AF, atrial fibrillation; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

Fig 4

Forest plot of the association between the plasma level of TGF-β1 and the two different types of AF.

AF, atrial fibrillation; CI, confidence interval; SD, standard deviation.

Forest plot of the association between the plasma level of TGF-β1 and AF occurrence depending on different study population in which TGF-β1 levels were analyzed as continuous variable.

AF, atrial fibrillation; CI, confidence interval; SD, standard deviation.

Forest plot of the association between the plasma level of TGF-β1 and AF occurrence in which TGF-β1 levels were analyzed as a categorical variable.

AF, atrial fibrillation; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

Forest plot of the association between the plasma level of TGF-β1 and the two different types of AF.

AF, atrial fibrillation; CI, confidence interval; SD, standard deviation.

Sensitivity and subgroup analysis

A subgroup analysis was performed based on the type of AF on 5 studies and it showed a positive correlation between high TGF-β1 plasma levels and the risk of new-onset AF (SMD 1.07; 95%CI 0.26–1.89) with significant heterogeneity (I² = 95%, P<0.00001) across studies. However, there was no clear relationship between plasma TGF-β1 levels and the risk of recurrent AF (SMD 0.38; 95%CI (-0.05–0.81) with significant heterogeneity (I² = 83%, P<0.00001) across studies (Fig 2). A predefined subgroup analysis was performed to investigate the origin of the heterogeneity between studies. In the subgroups with follow-up <12 months, LVEF <50% and sample size ≥100, there were no significant heterogeneity between studies. Therefore, the follow-up duration, LVEF and sample size are likely the origin of the significant heterogeneity in our meta-analysis (Table 4).
Table 4

Subgroup analyses of the association between the TGF-β plasma levels and incidence of AF.

SubgroupStudyNumber of studiesHeterogeneityMeta-analysis
I2p-ValueSMD95% CIp-Value
Follow-up duration<12 months20%0.490.48[0.04, 0.92]0.03
≥12 months588%<0.000010.36[-0.19, 0.92]0.2
Study designCohort783%<0.000010.38[-0.05, 0.81]0.09
Case control595%<0.000011.07[0.26, 1.89]0.01
LVEF<50%20%0.610.07[-0.25, 0.39]0.67
≥50%892<0.000010.81[0.36, 1.26]0.0004
Sample size<100892%<0.000011[0.24, 1.75]0.01
≥100448%0.120.17[-0.02, 0.35]0.07
Age of patients≤50 years497%<0.000011.75[0.09, 3.41]0.04
>50 years857%0.020.25[0.01, 0.48]0.04

AF = atrial fibrillation; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; CI = confidence interval; SMD = standard mean difference.

AF = atrial fibrillation; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; CI = confidence interval; SMD = standard mean difference. Finally, we performed a sensitivity analysis and found that there was no significant difference on the overall heterogeneity regardless of which study was removed. The result of the funnel plot for TGF-β1 in AF patients was asymmetrical, indicating the potential for publication bias (Fig 5). After removing the study with the highest levels of TGF-β1, the result of the funnel plot was symmetrical (Fig 6).
Fig 5

Funnel plot of the meta-analysis.

Fig 6

Funnel plot after removing the study with the highest levels of TGF-β1.

Discussion

The main finding of this comprehensive meta-analysis is that there is an association between high plasma TGF-β1 levels and risk of AF, especially for new-onset AF. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive meta-analysis performed to investigate their relationship. TGF-β1 is a major factor promoting collagen production in cardiac fibroblasts [27]. It is also considered to be a key factor in the signal cascade reaction during the process of tissue fibrosis [28, 29]. Multiple studies have found increased atrial fibrosis on biopsy or autopsy specimens of patients with AF and concurrently elevated plasma level of TGF-β1 [30, 31, 32]. Previous studies have only investigated the plasma level of TGF-β1 in specific subgroups, such as the patients who developed recurrent AF (following surgical maze procedure, electrical cardioversion and catheter ablation) or patients with new-onset AF after cardiac surgery. In our meta-analysis, different groups were analyzed together to identify the potential role of TGF-β1 in promoting AF. We demonstrated that there is a positive correlation between higher plasma TGF-β1 levels and the development of new onset AF and the overall occurrence of AF. However, it is worth noting that there was no clear relationship between plasma TGF-β1 levels and recurrent AF in the subgroup analysis. This finding could be due to the heterogeneity in study population and AF management strategy between studies. 4 studies included information on the type of AF, whether they were persistent or paroxysmal AF. Persistent AF was defined as AF lasting for more than 7 days while paroxysmal AF was defined as AF with spontaneous termination in less than 7 days. To investigate the relationship between TGF-β1 and the type of AF, we analyzed these 4[14, 16–18] studies which included the plasma level of TGF-β1 in both persistent AF and paroxysmal AF patients. TGF-β1 levels were found to be higher in patients with persistent AF compared to paroxysmal AF. The finding was expected as atrial fibrosis is more extensive with longer duration of AF. It also leads us to the hypothesis that TGF-β1 as an index of atrial fibrosis may inform us of the chronicity of AF. Despite being the most common sustained arrhythmia, the mechanism of AF is poorly understood. Systemic inflammatory response appear to be the contributing factor to the occurrence and recurrence of AF. A meta-analysis performed by Wu et al [33] demonstrated that high levels of circulating inflammatory factors especially CRP and IL-6 are associated with greater risk of AF in the general population, occurrence of AF after coronary artery bypass grafting and AF recurrence after electrical cardioversion or catheter ablation. In our analysis, we found that elevated levels of plasma TGF-β1 was associated with the occurrence of new onset AF. Our findings provide important insight into the mechanisms of AF.

Study Limitations

The present meta-analysis has several limitations. First, AF duration and methods of AF detection were different among the studies which account for the heterogeneity between the individual studies. Second, the sample size of the meta-analysis was relatively small. Finally, the asymmetrical funnel plot suggests that there may be publication bias.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests an association between high plasma TGF-β1 and the occurrence of new onset AF. Additional studies with larger sample sizes are needed to further investigate the relationship between plasma TGF-β1 and the occurrence of AF.

PRISMA checklist.

(DOC) Click here for additional data file.

Exclusion reasons for 26 articles.

(DOC) Click here for additional data file.
  33 in total

1.  High plasma concentrations of transforming growth factor-β and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1: potential non-invasive predictors for electroanatomical remodeling of atrium in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Sook Kyoung Kim; Jae Hyung Park; Jong Youn Kim; Jong Il Choi; Boyoung Joung; Moon-Hyoung Lee; Sung Soon Kim; Young-Hoon Kim; Hui-Nam Pak
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 2.993

Review 2.  Mortality as an endpoint in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Daniel M Beyerbach; Douglas P Zipes
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.343

3.  Users' guides to the medical literature. IV. How to use an article about harm. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

Authors:  M Levine; S Walter; H Lee; T Haines; A Holbrook; V Moyer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-05-25       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  TGF-beta1 expression and atrial myocardium fibrosis increase in atrial fibrillation secondary to rheumatic heart disease.

Authors:  Hua Xiao; Han Lei; Shu Qin; Kanghua Ma; Xi Wang
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.882

5.  Impact of transforming growth factor-beta1 on atrioventricular node conduction modification by injected autologous fibroblasts in the canine heart.

Authors:  T Jared Bunch; Srijoy Mahapatra; G Keith Bruce; Susan B Johnson; Dylan V Miller; Benjamin D Horne; Xiao-Li Wang; Hon-Chi Lee; Noel M Caplice; Douglas L Packer
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 6.  Atrial fibrosis and the mechanisms of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Thomas H Everett; Jeffrey E Olgin
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 6.343

7.  Association between transforming growth factor beta1 polymorphisms and atrial fibrillation in essential hypertensive subjects.

Authors:  Yongzheng Wang; Xuwei Hou; Yuliang Li
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 8.410

8.  Atrial fibrosis and atrial fibrillation: the role of the TGF-β1 signaling pathway.

Authors:  Felix Gramley; Johann Lorenzen; Eva Koellensperger; Klaus Kettering; Christian Weiss; Thomas Munzel
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 4.164

9.  Clinical and serological predictors for the recurrence of atrial fibrillation after electrical cardioversion.

Authors:  Sook Kyoung Kim; Hui-Nam Pak; Jae Hyung Park; Kyoung Jeong Ko; Jihei Sara Lee; Jong Il Choi; Dong Hoon Choi; Young-Hoon Kim
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 5.214

10.  Plasma transforming growth factor beta1 as a biochemical marker to predict the persistence of atrial fibrillation after the surgical maze procedure.

Authors:  Young Keun On; Eun-Seok Jeon; Sang Yeub Lee; Dae-Hee Shin; Jin-Oh Choi; Jidong Sung; June Soo Kim; Kiick Sung; Pyowon Park
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.209

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The Predictive Role of Inflammatory Biomarkers in Atrial Fibrillation as Seen through Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio Mirror.

Authors:  Feliciano Chanana Paquissi
Journal:  J Biomark       Date:  2016-07-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.