| Literature DB >> 27171001 |
Fabiano Di Marco1,2, Silvia Terraneo1,2, Gianluca Imeri1,2, Giuseppina Palumbo1,2, Francesca La Briola3, Silvia Tresoldi4, Angela Volpi5, Lorenzo Gualandri6, Filippo Ghelma7,2, Rosa Maria Alfano8, Emanuele Montanari9,2, Alfredo Gorio10,2, Elena Lesma10,2, Angela Peron3, Maria Paola Canevini3,2, Stefano Centanni1,2.
Abstract
The advent of pharmacological therapies for lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) has made early diagnosis important in women with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), although the lifelong cumulative radiation exposure caused by chest computer tomography (CT) should not be underestimated. We retrospectively investigated, in a cohort of TSC outpatients of San Paolo Hospital (Milan, Italy) 1) the role of pulmonary function tests (PFTs) for LAM diagnosis, 2) the association between LAM and other features of TSC (e.g. demography, extrapulmonary manifestations, genetic mutations, etc.), and 3) the characteristics of patients with multifocal micronodular pneumocyte hyperplasia (MMPH). Eighty-six women underwent chest CT scan; pulmonary involvement was found in 66 patients (77%; 49% LAM with or without MMPH, and 28% MMPH alone). LAM patients were older, with a higher rate of pneumothorax, presented more frequently with renal and hepatic angiomyolipomas, and tended to have a TSC2 mutation profile. PFTs, assessed in 64% of women unaffected by cognitive impairments, revealed a lower lung diffusion capacity in LAM patients. In multivariate analysis, age, but not PFTs, resulted independently associated with LAM diagnosis. Patients with MMPH alone did not show specific clinical, functional or genetic features. A mild respiratory impairment was most common in LAM-TSC patients: In conclusions, PFTs, even if indicated to assess impairment in lung function, are feasible in a limited number of patients, and are not significantly useful for LAM diagnosis in women with TSC.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27171001 PMCID: PMC4865186 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155331
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Population in analysis.
Age is shown as mean ± standard deviation and is referred to first evaluation in the center. LAM = lymphangioleiomyomatosis; TSC = tuberous sclerosis complex; *percentage referred to all adult TSC females patients in which lung scan was available for evaluation.
Demographic and clinical characteristics of enrolled patients according with LAM.
| ALL PATIENTS | LAM-TSC | TSC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number (%) | 86 | 42 (49) | 44 (51) | |
| Age at first CT evaluation, yrs | 34 ± 12 | 39 ± 12 | 30 ± 9 | |
| Genotype | ||||
| 33 (40) | 11 (28) | 22 (52) | ||
| 40 (49) | 24 (60) | 16 (38) | ||
| No mutation identified (NMI), n (%) | 9 (11) | 5 (12) | 4 (10) | |
| Renal angiomyolipomas, n (%) | 63 (75) | 36 (88) | 27 (62) | |
| n <3/n≥ 3, n (%) | 9 (25)/ 27 (75) | 3 (11)/ 23 (89) | 6 (60)/ 4 (40) | |
| bilateral angiomyolipomas, n (%) | 32 (80) | 23 (88) | 9 (64) | 0.102 |
| Renal cysts, n (%) | 30 (40) | 16 (44) | 14 (37) | 0.636 |
| Hepatic angiomyolipoma, n (%) | 29 (35) | 22 (54) | 7 (17) | |
| 84 (99) | 41 (100) | 43 (97) | >0.999 | |
| Hypomelanotic macules, n (%) | 51 (91) | 26 (93) | 25 (89) | >0.999 |
| Facial angiofibromas, n (%) | 58 (97) | 30 (100) | 28 (90) | 0.492 |
| Fiorhead plaque, n (%) | 26 (81) | 10 (77) | 16 (84) | 0.666 |
| Shagreen patches, n (%) | 13 (41) | 7 (50) | 6 (33) | 0.473 |
| Ungual fibromas, n (%) | 30 (77) | 18 (95) | 12 (60) | |
| Epilepsy, n (%) | 54 (64) | 22 (54) | 32 (72) | 0.076 |
| Cortical tubers, n (%) | 78 (92) | 37 (88) | 41 (95) | 0.265 |
| Subependymal nodules, n (%) | 58 (76) | 29 (78) | 29 (74) | 0.790 |
| SEGA, n (%) | 13 (17) | 8 (22) | 5 (13) | 0.591 |
| Sleep disorders, n (%) | 58 (89) | 26 (87) | 32 (91) | 0.695 |
| Intellectual disability, n (%) | 35 (44) | 19 (47) | 16 (40) | 0.652 |
| Borderline, n (%) | 5 (6) | 4 (10) | 1 (2) | 0.586 |
| Level 1, n (%) | 10 (12) | 5 (12) | 5 (12) | |
| Level 2, n (%) | 8 (10) | 3 (7) | 5 (12) | |
| Level 3, n (%) | 12 (15) | 7 (17) | 5 (12) | |
| Fundus oculi abnormalities, n (%) | 32 (73) | 15 (68) | 17 (77) | 0.736 |
| Retinic amartomas, n (%) | 6 (46) | 2 (29) | 4 (67) | 0.286 |
| Cardiac rhabdomyomas, n (%) | 12 (17) | 4 (11) | 8 (22) | 0.343 |
Results are shown as mean± standard deviation unless otherwise stated. SEGA: subependymal giant cell astrocytoma; IQR: interquartile range; SD: standard deviation. p < 0.050 in bold.
aResults of genetic analysis were available for 82 TSC patients.
Fig 2Age-dependent risk of LAM.
(A) on age quartiles in the overall population (p = 0.004) (B) predicted probability of LAM in relationship to age and 95% CI in patients with and without altered pulmonary function tests. Points along the central logistic curve are individual predicted probabilities. Black points refer to patients with normal pulmonary function tests (PFT), white points refer to patients with altered PFT. The corresponding 95% CI for each point appears on the outer logistic curves. The dotted lines refer to 95% CI of predicted probability for patients with altered PFT while the continuous line refers to IC in patients with normal PFT.
Lung function, pulmonary manifestations and symptoms of patients according with LAM.
| ALL PATIENTS | LAM-TSC | TSC | P value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FEV1 (% pred), median (IQR) | 95 (85–106) | 95 (85–106) | 94 (86–108) | 0.736 | |
| FVC (% pred) | 99 ± 17 | 100 ± 19 | 97 ± 15 | 0.607 | |
| FEV1/FVC ratio, median (IQR) | 101 (96–104) | 99 (94–103) | 102 (97–104) | 0.166 | |
| FEV1/FVC ratio < LLN, n (%) | 6 (11) | 5 (21) | 1 (3) | 0.080 | |
| DLCO (% pred) | 81 ± 18 | 74 ± 22 | 86 ± 14 | ||
| VA (% pred) | 96 ± 15 | 93 ±16 | 98 ± 14 | 0.229 | |
| DLCO/VA (% pred) | 81 ± 18 | 74 ± 20 | 87 ± 15 | ||
| DLCO/VA < 80% pred, n (%) | 25 (46) | 16 (64) | 9 (31) | ||
| VR (% pred) | 131 ± 59 | 140 ± 65 | 127 ± 56 | 0.502 | |
| TGV (% pred) | 116 ±34 | 123 ± 38 | 112 ± 31 | 0.358 | |
| Alteration of PFT, n (%) | 32 (58) | 19 (73) | 13 (44) | ||
| Smoke history (current/ex), n (%) | 8 (9)/ 1 (1) | 6 (14)/ 1 (3) | 2 (4)/ 0 (0) | 0.166 | |
| Pneumothorax, n (%) | 5 (6) | 5 (12) | 0 (0) | ||
| Chylothorax | 3 (3) | 3 (7) | 0 (0) | 0.112 | |
| MMPH, n (%) | 43 (50) | 19 (45) | 24 (55) | 0.518 | |
| Dyspnea, n (%) | 14 (17) | 9 (23) | 5 (11) | 0.241 | |
| mMRC = 1, n (%) | 2 (14) | 1 (11) | 1 (20) | 0.486 | |
| mMRC >1, n (%) | 12 (86) | 8 (89) | 4 (80) | ||
| SpO2 < 90% during 6mWT, n (%) | 11 (14) | 4 (10) | 7 (18) | 0.518 | |
Results are shown as mean± standard deviation unless otherwise stated. PFT: pulmonary function test (alteration: FEV1/FVC < LLN, and/or DLCO < 80%, and/or DLCO/VA < 80%); IQR: interquartile range; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in one second; FVC: forced expiratory volume; LLN: lower limit of normality; DLCO: diffusion capacity for CO; VA: alveolar volume; TLC: total lung capacity; RV: residual volume; TGV: thoracic gas volume; MMPH: multifocal micronodular pneumocyte hyperplasia; mMRC: Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale, %pred: % of predicted value; p < 0.050 in bold.
aData and percentage referred to 55 patients who performed lung function tests
bData and percentage referred to 86 patients with CT scan.
Demographic, pulmonary, clinical characteristic and genetic analysis of TSC patients according with MMPH.
| MMPH-TSC | TSC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Number | 24 | 20 | |
| Age at first CT evaluation, (yrs) | 32 ± 7 | 27 ± 10 | 0.074 |
| Dyspnea, n (%) | 4 (83) | 4 (17) | 0.362 |
| Smoke history (current or past), n (%) | 1 (4) | 1 (5) | >0.999 |
| SO2 < 90% during 6mWT, n (%) | 6 (29) | 1 (5) | 0.095 |
| FEV1 (% pred) | 96 ± 13 | 98 ± 8 | 0.550 |
| FEV1/FVC < LLN, n (%) | 1 (5) | 0 (0) | >0.999 |
| FVC (% pred) | 98 ± 16 | 97 ±13 | 0.806 |
| DLCO (% pred) | 84 ± 13 | 90 ±15 | 0.297 |
| VA (% pred) | 100 ±15 | 96 ±14 | 0.562 |
| DLCO/VA (% pred) | 86 ±13 | 89 ± 17 | 0.697 |
| RV (% pred) | 125 ±63 | 128 ±31 | 0.881 |
| 14 (58) | 8 (44) | 0.355 | |
| 9 (37) | 7 (39) | ||
| No mutation identified (NMI), n (%) | 1 (4) | 3 (17) | |
| Renal angiomyolipomas, n (%) | 12 (50) | 15 (79) | 0.064 |
| Hepatic angiomyolipoma, n (%) | 3 (14) | 4 (21) | 0.760 |
| 24 (100) | 19 (95) | 0.455 | |
| Epilepsy, n (%) | 18 (75) | 14 (70) | 0.746 |
| Brain tubers, n (%) | 23 (100) | 18 (90) | 0.210 |
| Intellectual disability, n (%) | 7 (33) | 9 (47) | 0.520 |
| Retinic hamartoma, n (%) | 4 (100) | 0 (0) | 0.067 |
| Cardiac hamartoma, n (%) | 3 (15) | 5 (31) | 0.422 |
Results are shown as mean± standard deviation unless otherwise stated. IQR: interquartile range; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in one second; FVC: forced expiratory volume; LLN: lower limit of normality; DLCO: diffusion capacity for CO; VA: alveolar volume; TLC: total lung capacity; RV: residual volume; TGV: thoracic gas volume; yrs: years; %pred: % of predicted value.
aAny skin manifestation of TSC.
Multivariate Analysis and ODDS RATIO for LAM risk in overall population.
| UNIVARIATE | MULTIVARIATE | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | OR | 95% CI | p value | OR | 95% CI | p value |
| Haepatic AML | 4.26 | 1.39–13.09 | 0.011 | - | - | - |
| Renal AML | 2.26 | 1.02–5.00 | 0.430 | - | - | - |
| Altered PFT | 3.34 | 1.07–10.38 | 0.037 | - | - | - |
| TSC1/TSC2 | 1.52 | 0.79–2.95 | 0.207 | - | - | - |
| Age | 1.08 | 1.03–1.13 | 0.001 | 1.083 | 1.014–1.156 | |
AML: angiomyolipoma; PFT: pulmonary function test; TSC1/2/NMI: mutation of TSC1 TSC2 genes/ no mutation identified; Age: referred to age at first CT evaluation; p < 0.050 in bold.