Literature DB >> 27170468

Heart rate variability and cardiac baroreflex inhibition-derived index predicts pain perception in burn patients.

Vasilios Papaioannou1, Ioanna Chouvarda2, Elizabeth Gaertner3, Mourad Benyamina4, Axelle Ferry5, Veronique Maurel6, Sabri Soussi7, Alice Blet8, Marc Chaouat9, Benoît Plaud10, Alexandre Mebazaa11, Matthieu Legrand12.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dressing changes induce acute pain in burn patients. This pain is difficult to predict and may be therefore undertreated. Two different non-invasive electrophysiological indices from heart rate variability and baroreflex inhibition-derived indices, analgesia/nociception index (ANI) and cardiovascular depth of analgesia (CARDEAN), have been proposed to predict and better assess adequacy of anti-nociception. The aim of this study was to evaluate these techniques as early pain alert tools in conscious burnt patients during dressing changes' procedures.
METHODS: Twenty adult burnt patients undergoing scheduled wound treatment procedures were included in this prospective observational study. Pain intensity was assessed using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) and was compared with both ANI and CARDEAN, during the procedures. Non parametric rank sum test and linear discriminant analysis were used for evaluating potential differences of measured variables between periods with different pain intensities. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were built to assess their performance to detect pain within following 15s.
RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of ANI to detect pain were 67% and 70% and those of CARDEAN were 77% and 80%, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.75 and 0.83, respectively. Their combination increased AUC to 0.87.
CONCLUSIONS: Both ANI and CARDEAN indices during wound treatment procedures seem to discriminate periods with and without pain within 15s, serving as a potential complementary tool for early optimized pain control.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Burns; Heart rate variability; Nociception; Physiologic monitoring; Procedural pain; Signal processing

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27170468     DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.04.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Burns        ISSN: 0305-4179            Impact factor:   2.744


  5 in total

1.  Early heart rate variability evaluation enables to predict ICU patients' outcome.

Authors:  Laetitia Bodenes; Quang-Thang N'Guyen; Raphaël Le Mao; Nicolas Ferrière; Victoire Pateau; François Lellouche; Erwan L'Her
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Comparison between Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) and self-reported measures for diagnosing pain in conscious individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daniela Abrão Baroni; Lucas Guimarães Abreu; Saul Martins Paiva; Luciane Rezende Costa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Newborn infant parasympathetic evaluation for the assessment of analgosedation adequacy in infants treated by mechanical ventilation - a multicenter pilot study.

Authors:  Wojciech Walas; Ewelina Malinowska; Zenon P Halaba; Tomasz Szczapa; Julita Latka-Grot; Magdalena Rutkowska; Agata Kubiaczyk; Monika Wrońska; Andrzej Piotrowski; Michał Skrzypek; Mickael Jean-Noel; Iwona Maroszyńska
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.318

4.  Differences in heart rate variability may be related to the appearance of postoperative pain in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery.

Authors:  Shinya Uchida; Yuji Kadoi; Shigeru Saito
Journal:  JA Clin Rep       Date:  2017-10-11

5.  Perceived Pain Responses to Foam Rolling Associate with Basal Heart Rate Variability.

Authors:  Marvette Wilkerson; Christopher Anderson; Gregory J Grosicki; Andrew A Flatt
Journal:  Int J Ther Massage Bodywork       Date:  2021-06-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.