| Literature DB >> 27170357 |
Kurt D Carpenter1, Kathryn M Kuivila2, Michelle L Hladik3, Tana Haluska2, Michael B Cole4.
Abstract
Insecticide use in urban areas results in the detection of these compounds in streams following stormwater runoff at concentrations likely to cause toxicity for stream invertebrates. In this 2013 study, stormwater runoff and streambed sediments were analyzed for 91 pesticides dissolved in water and 118 pesticides on sediment. Detections included 33 pesticides, including insecticides, fungicides, herbicides, degradates, and a synergist. Patterns in pesticide occurrence reveal transport of dissolved and sediment-bound pesticides, including pyrethroids, from upland areas through stormwater outfalls to receiving streams. Nearly all streams contained at least one insecticide at levels exceeding an aquatic-life benchmark, most often for bifenthrin and (or) fipronil. Multiple U.S. EPA benchmark or criterion exceedances occurred in 40 % of urban streams sampled. Bed sediment concentrations of bifenthrin were highly correlated (p < 0.001) with benthic invertebrate assemblages. Non-insects and tolerant invertebrates such as amphipods, flatworms, nematodes, and oligochaetes dominated streams with relatively high concentrations of bifenthrin in bed sediments, whereas insects, sensitive invertebrates, and mayflies were much more abundant at sites with no or low bifenthrin concentrations. The abundance of sensitive invertebrates, % EPT, and select mayfly taxa were strongly negatively correlated with organic-carbon normalized bifenthrin concentrations in streambed sediments. Our findings from western Clackamas County, Oregon (USA), expand upon previous research demonstrating the transport of pesticides from urban landscapes and linking impaired benthic invertebrate assemblages in urban streams with exposure to pyrethroid insecticides.Entities:
Keywords: Benthic invertebrates; Bifenthrin; Fipronil; Pesticides; Source; Transport; Urban streams
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27170357 PMCID: PMC4869748 DOI: 10.1007/s10661-016-5215-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Monit Assess ISSN: 0167-6369 Impact factor: 2.513
List of stormwater outfall and stream sampling sites, basin characteristics, select pesticide concentrations in stormwater runoff and streambed sediments, and benthic invertebrate assemblage disturbance class
| Map no. | Site | % urban | % impervious area | Storm runoff SSC (mg/L) | Stormwater runoff concentrationsa for pesticides exceeding aquatic-life benchmarks or criteria | Streambed sediment concentrations (μg/kg) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bifenthrin | Fipronil | Malathion | DDE + DDD | Total pyrethroids | Total DDT degradates | Invertebrate assemblage disturbance classb | |||||
|
| |||||||||||
| 1 | Outfall to Tanner Creek | 97 | 42 | 68 | 120* | 30* | < | < | 1700 | – | – |
| 2 | Tanner Creek | 77 | 40 | 136 | 97* | 127** | < | < | 34 | < | Severe |
| 3 | Outfall to Lost Dog Creek | 65 | 27 | 85 | 31* | 59* | < | < | 246 | – | – |
| 4 | Lost Dog Creek | 52 | 21 | 102 | 24* | 16* | < | 1.1*** | 73.9 | 2.3 | Severe |
| 5 | Outfall to Rose Creek/Sieben Creek | 100 | 78 | 104 | 32* | < | < | < | 304 | – | – |
| 6 | Sieben Creek | 62 | 35 | 545 | 39* | 10 | < | 9.2*** | 1.7 | 0.9 | Moderate |
| 7 | Outfall to Kellogg Creek | 94 | 43 | 6.2 | < | 6.1 | < | < | 240 | 1.7 | – |
| 8 | Kellogg Creek | 76 | 42 | 76 | 21* | 10.5 | < | < | 3.1 | 1.2 | Moderate |
| 9 | Outfall to detention pond, Wilsonvillec | 65 | 66 | 152 | 29* | < | < | < | 190 | – | – |
|
| |||||||||||
| 11 | Ball Creek | 83 | 35 | 89 | 21* | 19* | < | < | 4.1 | < | Severe |
| 10 | Boeckman Creek (lower) | 39 | 20 | 32 | < | < | < | < | 1.2 | < | Severe |
| 13 | Carli Creek | 96 | 74 | 105 | 23* | < | < | < | 8.8 | < | Severe |
| 14 | Coffee Creek | 82 | 39 | 200 | 23* | 6.7 | < | < | 1 | 0.7 | Slight |
| 16 | Minthorn Spring Creek | 92 | 47 | 339 | 24* | 6.4 | < | < | 3.5 | 4 | Severe |
| 18 | Singer Creek | 83 | 37 | 247 | < | < | 457** | < | 30.4 | 1.1 | Slight-moderate |
| 19 | Singer Creek tributary | 77 | 34 | 31 | < | 20* | < | < | < | < | nd |
| 20 | Trilium Creek | 68 | 29 | 162 | 24* | 12* | < | < | 30.3 | 1.1 | Moderate-severe |
|
| |||||||||||
| 12 | Boeckman Creek (upper) | 29 | 15 | 1770 | 31* | < | < | < | < | < | nd |
| 15 | Deep Creek | 8 | 4 | 138 | 22* | < | < | 2.7*** | < | 0.8 | nd |
| 17 | Rock Creek | 26 | 12 | 34 | < | 12* | < | < | < | 0.7 | Moderate-severe |
Map is shown in SI 1. Percent urban and impervious areas from National Land Cover Data (NLCD; Fry et al. 2011; impervious area data updated in 2014). Urban area includes NLCD classes 22, 23, and 23 (low-, medium-, and high-intensity urban). Pesticide exceedances indicated with asterisk(s) according to: * Exceeds the U.S. EPA Office of Pesticide Programs 21-day chronic benchmark for invertebrates of 1.3 ng/L bifenthrin or 11 ng/L fipronil; ** Exceeds the U.S. EPA Office of Pesticide Programs acute benchmark for invertebrates of 110 ng/L fipronil or 300 ng/L malathion; *** Exceeds water-quality criterion of 1 ng/L for total DDT plus degradates established by the Clean Water Act for the protection of aquatic life
SSC suspended sediment concentration, mg/L milligrams per liter, nd no data; <, less than MDL (see Table SI 4); –, not applicable
aStormwater runoff values are whole-water concentrations (sum of the dissolved and suspended fractions) in ng/L
bBased on the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality invertebrate metric scores presented in Lemke et al. (2013) and Cole (2014)
cThis outfall does not discharge to Boeckman Creek
Fig. 1Screened Inline Flow-Through (SIFT) sediment trap
Pesticide concentrations in stormwater outfall discharge and SIFT sediments
| Pesticide (type) | Detection frequency (%) | Outfall to Lost Dog Creeka | Outfall to Tanner Creek | Outfal to Rose Creek/Sieben Creek | Outfall to Kellogg Creek | Outfall to detention pond, Wilsonville | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||
| Bifenthrin (I) | 80 | 37 (240) | 120 (1697) | 32 (304) | – | < | – | 29 (190) |
| Fipronil (I) | 60 | 59 | 30 | < | – | 6.1 | – | < |
| Metolachlor (H) | 60 | < | 13 | < | – | 6 | – | 72 |
| Carbaryl (I) | 40 | 50 | 13 | < | – | < | – | < |
| Fipronil sulfide (D) | 40 | 9.4 | 3.5 | < | – | < | – | < |
| Iprodione (F) | 40 | 15 (145) | < | < | – | < | – | < |
| Kresoxim-methyl (F) | 40 | 6 (58) | < | < | – | < | – | 12 (76) |
| Zoxamide (F) | 40 | 9 (91) | < | < | – | < | – | 28 (187) |
| Boscalid (F) | 20 | 8.6 | < | < | – | < | – | < |
| Esfenvalerate (I) | 20 | 6.2 | < | < | – | < | – | < |
| Fenbuconazole (F) | 20 | 7.2 | < | < | – | < | – | < |
| Fipronil desulfinyl (D) | 20 | < | < | < | – | 10.5 | -- | < |
| Flusilazole (F) | 20 | 6.3 | < | < | – | < | – | < |
| Piperonyl butoxide (S) | 20 | 18 | < | < | – | < | – | < |
|
| Sample 1 | Sample 2 | Sample 1 | Sample 2 | Sample 1 | |||
| Bifenthrin (I) | 100 | – | – | 24 | 436 | 12.1 | 11.5 | 179 |
| Pendimethalin (H) | 100 | – | – | 20 | 849 | 4.9 | 6.2 | 380 |
| Trifluralin (H) | 80 | – | – | < | 40 | 21 | 1.6 | 49 |
| Dithiopyr (H) | 60 | – | – | 12 | 244 | < | < | 176 |
| Prodiamine (H) | 40 | – | – | < | 39 | < | < | 92 |
| DDE (D) | 20 | – | – | < | < | 1.7 | < | < |
| Pentachloroanisole (D) | 20 | – | – | 1.2 | < | < | < | < |
| Oxyfluorfen (H) | 20 | – | – | < | < | 12.5 | < | < |
| Methoprene (I) | 20 | – | – | < | < | < | 25 | < |
Whole-water pesticide concentrations in stormwater outfall discharge in ng/L; suspended sediment concentrations in stormwater outfall discharge in μg/kg (shown in parens).
SIFT sediment pesticide concentrations in μg/kg
Pesticide types: F fungicide, H herbicide, I insecticide, S synergist, D pesticide degradate. <, less than MDL (see Table SI 4); –, no data
aAlthough this sampling site is classified as an outfall, about 27 % (40 acres) of the upstream watershed is “unpiped” area drained by surface channels
Pesticide concentrations in streams during stormwater runoff and in streambed sediments
| Pesticide (type) | Predominantly urban streams | Streams draining some agricultural land | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Detection frequency (%) | Tanner Cr. | Lost Dog Cr. | Sieben Cr. | Kellogg Cr. | Ball Cr. | Boeckman Creek (lower) | Carli Cr. | Coffee Cr. | Minthorne Spg. Cr. | Singer Cr. | Singer Cr. tributary | Trillium Cr. | Boeckman Creek (upper) | Deep Cr. | Rock Cr. | |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Bifenthrin (I) | 73 | 97 (672) | 24 (284) | 39 (72) | 21 (277) | 21 (235) | < | 23 (218) | 23 (114) | 24 (70) | < | < | 24 (146) | 31 (17) | 22 (159) | < |
| Fipronil (I) | 67 | 127 | 16 | 10 | 11 | 19 | < | < | 6.7 | 6.4 | < | 20 | 12 | < | < | 12 |
| Metolachlor (H) | 67 | 9.1 | < | 7.2 | 7.2 | 10.2 | 11 | < | 14 | 5.4 | 45 | < | 7.8 | 22 | < | < |
| Carbaryl (I) | 27 | 135 | 15 | 66 | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | 9 | < | < | < |
| DDE (D) | 20 | < | 1 (13) | 4 (7) | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | 3 (20) | < |
| Pendimethalin (H) | 20 | < | < | 25 (46) | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | 36 (20) | 39 (279) | < |
| Propiconazole (F) | 20 | < | < | < | 57 | < | < | 215 | < | < | < | < | < | < | 83 | < |
| Iprodione (F) | 13 | < | < | 21 (39) | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | 26.9 | < |
| Zoxamide (F) | 13 | < | < | 14 (25) | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | 22 |
| Azoxystrobin (F) | 7 | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | 63 | < |
| DCPA (H) | 7 | < | < | < | < | < | < | 10 | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < |
| Kresoxim-methyl (F) | 7 | < | < | 8 (15) | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < |
| Malathion (I) | 7 | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | 457 | < | < | < | < | < |
| Malathion-oxon (D) | 7 | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | 47 | < | < | < | < | < |
| DDD (D) | 7 | < | < | 5 (9) | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < |
| Simazine (H) | 7 | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | 108 | < | < | < |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Bifenthrin (I) | 71 | 34 | 27 | 1.7 | 3.1 | 4.1 | 1.2 | 8.8 | 1 | 3.5 | < | – | 2.5 | < | < | < |
| DDE (D) | 64 | < | 2.3 | 0.9 | 1.2 | < | < | < | 0.7 | 2.7 | 1.1 | – | 1.1 | < | 0.8 | 0.7 |
| Trifluralin (H) | 29 | 6.4 | 3.1 | 1.5 | < | 2 | < | < | < | < | < | – | < | < | < | < |
| Dithiopyr (H) | 29 | 2.8 | 1.4 | < | < | < | < | 2.2 | < | < | < | – | 1 | < | < | < |
| Metalaxyl (F) | 21 | < | < | < | < | < | 21 | < | < | 20 | 392 | – | < | < | < | < |
| Cypermethrin (I) | 14 | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | 30 | – | 28 | < | < | < |
| Pentachloroanisole (D) | 14 | < | 2.8 | < | < | < | < | 3.7 | < | < | < | – | < | < | < | < |
| Cyfluthrin (I) | 7 | < | 47 | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | – | < | < | < | < |
| Fenpyroximate (I) | 7 | 15.1 | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | – | < | < | < | < |
| Pendimethalin (H) | 7 | < | < | < | < | < | < | 32 | < | < | < | – | < | < | < | < |
| Prodiamine (H) | 7 | < | < | < | < | < | < | 8.4 | < | < | < | – | < | < | < | < |
| Oxyfluorfen (H) | 7 | < | < | < | 68 | < | < | < | < | < | < | – | < | < | < | < |
| DDD (D) | 7 | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | 1.3 | < | – | < | < | < | < |
Stormwater runoff pesticide concentrations in ng/L (suspended sediment concentrations in μg/kg in parens). Streambed sediment pesticide concentrations in μg/kg
Pesticide types: F fungicide, H herbicide, I insecticide, D degradate; <, less than MDL (see Table SI 4); –, no data
aStormwater runoff values are whole-water concentrations (sum of the dissolved and suspended fractions)
Fig. 2Maximum concentrations of pesticides in stormwater runoff. Sampling included 15 streams and 5 outfall sites, each sampled once. Bar cross hatches indicate pesticides with maximum concentrations in stormwater outfalls. Pesticide types: F, fungicide; H, herbicide; I, insecticide; S, synergist; D, degradate
Fig. 3Comparison of dissolved and suspended sediment associated pesticides in stormwater. Includes compounds detected in >1 sample (n = 20 samples). Pesticide types: F, fungicide; H, herbicide; I, insecticide; D, pesticide degradate
Fig. 4Stormwater runoff concentrations of a total bifenthrin and b dissolved fipronil in paired stormwater outfalls and receiving streams, and c mass-per-unit-mass bifenthrin concentrations in outfalls, streams, and streambed sediments. Note log scale of y axis in panel c. Lost Dog Creek outfall contains 40 acres of “unpiped” area drained by surface channels
Fig. 5Regression of bifenthrin concentrations on suspended sediments (in runoff) and those in streambed sediments. Note log scale in x and y axes
Fig. 6Ordination of creek benthic invertebrate samples with bubble plot overlay of bifenthrin concentrations in streambed sediments
Fig. 7Biplots of organic-carbon-normalized bifenthrin concentrations in streambed sediments and a abundance of sensitive invertebrate taxa, b percent EPT abundance (see text), and c abundance of select mayfly taxa. Includes only streams with comparable invertebrate data. Pacific Northwest [PNW] sensitive invertebrate scores based on tolerance values from Barbour et al. (1999)