Hong-Feng Huang1,2,3,4, Jing-Yi Zhou1,2,3,4, Wen-Qing Xie1,2,3,4, Jian-Yong Wu1,2,3,4, Hao Deng1,2,3,4, Jiang-Hua Chen5,6,7,8. 1. Kidney Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Qingchun Road 79, Hangzhou, 310003, China. 2. Key Laboratory of Nephropathy, Hangzhou, 310003, Zhejiang Province, China. 3. Kidney Disease Immunology Laboratory, The Third Grade Laboratory, State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine of China, Hangzhou, 310003, China. 4. Key Laboratory of Multiple Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Health of China, Hangzhou, 310003, China. 5. Kidney Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Qingchun Road 79, Hangzhou, 310003, China. chenjianghua@zju.edu.cn. 6. Key Laboratory of Nephropathy, Hangzhou, 310003, Zhejiang Province, China. chenjianghua@zju.edu.cn. 7. Kidney Disease Immunology Laboratory, The Third Grade Laboratory, State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine of China, Hangzhou, 310003, China. chenjianghua@zju.edu.cn. 8. Key Laboratory of Multiple Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Health of China, Hangzhou, 310003, China. chenjianghua@zju.edu.cn.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the long-term effects of the interleukin-2 receptor antagonist basiliximab versus rabbit antithymocyte globulin as an induction therapy for living-related renal transplantation. METHODS: This is a prospective, open-label, nonrandomized, controlled study including 213 cases of renal transplant. Immunosuppressive therapy containing calcineurin inhibitors, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids was applied in all cases. The interleukin-2 receptor antagonist group (IL2Ra group) included 108 cases with 20 mg basiliximab induction on Day 0 and Day 4. The other 105 cases comprised the rabbit antithymocyte globulin group (rATG group) with 1.0 mg/kg/day ATG induction from Day 0 to Day 4. The primary endpoint was biopsy-proven acute rejection. Other endpoints included delayed graft function (DGF), graft loss and death. RESULTS: All patients were followed up for 3 years. Acute rejection rates in the IL2Ra group and the ATG group were 5.6 and 3.8 % (P = 0.781), and the differences in the DGF rates, graft loss and death were insignificant between groups. All-cause infection rates in the IL2Ra and rATG groups were 26.9 and 43.8 % (P = 0.010). Urinary tract infections were more common in the rATG group than in the IL2Ra group (15.2 vs 6.5 %, P = 0.040). Specific viral infection rates were significantly different (18.1 % in rATG group vs 8.3 % in IL2Ra group, P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: IL2Ra and rATG had no significant differences as induction therapies during the perioperative period of living-related renal transplantation, according to acute rejection rates, DGF rates, graft loss, 1- and 3-year patient/graft survival rates. However, the incidence of infection, especially of urinary tract infection and specific viral infection, was higher in rATG-induced patients.
PURPOSE: To compare the long-term effects of the interleukin-2 receptor antagonist basiliximab versus rabbit antithymocyte globulin as an induction therapy for living-related renal transplantation. METHODS: This is a prospective, open-label, nonrandomized, controlled study including 213 cases of renal transplant. Immunosuppressive therapy containing calcineurin inhibitors, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids was applied in all cases. The interleukin-2 receptor antagonist group (IL2Ra group) included 108 cases with 20 mg basiliximab induction on Day 0 and Day 4. The other 105 cases comprised the rabbit antithymocyte globulin group (rATG group) with 1.0 mg/kg/day ATG induction from Day 0 to Day 4. The primary endpoint was biopsy-proven acute rejection. Other endpoints included delayed graft function (DGF), graft loss and death. RESULTS: All patients were followed up for 3 years. Acute rejection rates in the IL2Ra group and the ATG group were 5.6 and 3.8 % (P = 0.781), and the differences in the DGF rates, graft loss and death were insignificant between groups. All-cause infection rates in the IL2Ra and rATG groups were 26.9 and 43.8 % (P = 0.010). Urinary tract infections were more common in the rATG group than in the IL2Ra group (15.2 vs 6.5 %, P = 0.040). Specific viral infection rates were significantly different (18.1 % in rATG group vs 8.3 % in IL2Ra group, P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: IL2Ra and rATG had no significant differences as induction therapies during the perioperative period of living-related renal transplantation, according to acute rejection rates, DGF rates, graft loss, 1- and 3-year patient/graft survival rates. However, the incidence of infection, especially of urinary tract infection and specific viral infection, was higher in rATG-induced patients.
Authors: H Sollinger; B Kaplan; M D Pescovitz; B Philosophe; A Roza; K Brayman; K Somberg Journal: Transplantation Date: 2001-12-27 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Himanshu V Patel; Vivek B Kute; Aruna V Vanikar; Pankaj R Shah; Manoj R Gumber; Divyesh P Engineer; Hargovind L Trivedi Journal: Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl Date: 2014-07
Authors: Marissa M Brokhof; Hans W Sollinger; David R Hager; Brenda L Muth; John D Pirsch; Luis A Fernandez; Janet M Bellingham; Joshua D Mezrich; David P Foley; Anthony M D'Alessandro; Jon S Odorico; Maha A Mohamed; Vijay Vidyasagar; Thomas M Ellis; Dixon B Kaufman; Arjang Djamali Journal: Transplantation Date: 2014-03-27 Impact factor: 4.939