Literature DB >> 27170277

The modified ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy technique and comparison with standard nephrolithotomy: a randomized prospective study.

Tolga Karakan1, Muhammet Fatih Kilinc2, Omer Gokhan Doluoglu3, Yildiray Yildiz3, Cem Nedim Yuceturk3, Murat Bagcioglu4, Mehmet Ali Karagöz3, Okan Bas5, Berkan Resorlu6.   

Abstract

To compare the success and complications of ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UPNL) and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SPNL) techniques. We prospectively analyzed 50 patients who underwent SPNL, and 47 patients who underwent UPNL. The patients with a stone size equal to or smaller than 25 mm and we used flipping a coin as the randomization technique. The mean stone size was 20.9 ± 3.6 mm in SPNL, and 20.3 ± 3.0 mm in ultra-mini PNL groups. Stone free rates were 88 % (44/50 patients) and 89.3 % (42/47 patients) in SPNL and UPNL groups, respectively, without any significant difference in between (p = 0.33). No major complications were seen in the UPNL group. PNL has been modified into micro PNL and UPNL parallel to the technological advances to decrease the complications of PNL. When performed as we do UPNL may be an alternative method to SPNL without any additional smaller-calibred nephroscope and with a similar high success rate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Operative complication; Percutaneous lithotripsy; Urolithiasis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27170277     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-016-0890-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  26 in total

1.  Is Micropercutaneous Nephrolithotomy Technique Really Efficacicous for the Treatment of Moderate Size Renal Calculi? Yes.

Authors:  Tuna Karatag; Ibrahim Buldu; Ramazan Inan; Mustafa Okan Istanbulluoglu
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 2.  Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Maurice Stephan Michel; Lutz Trojan; Jens Jochen Rassweiler
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Standard, mini, ultra-mini, and micro percutaneous nephrolithotomy: what is next? A novel labeling system for percutaneous nephrolithotomy according to the size of the access sheath used during procedure.

Authors:  Abdulkadir Tepeler; Kemal Sarica
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Minimally invasive PCNL in patients with renal pelvic and calyceal stones.

Authors:  S Lahme; K H Bichler; W L Strohmaier; T Götz
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  The role of microperc in the treatment of symptomatic lower pole renal calculi.

Authors:  Abdulkadir Tepeler; Abdullah Armagan; Ahmet Ali Sancaktutar; Mesrur Selcuk Silay; Necmettin Penbegul; Tolga Akman; Namık Kemal Hatipoglu; Cevper Ersoz; Mehmet Remzi Erdem; Muzaffer Akcay
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Effect of percutaneous nephrolithotomy on renal functions in children: assessment by quantitative SPECT of (99m)Tc-DMSA uptake by the kidneys.

Authors:  Izzet Cicekbilek; Berkan Resorlu; Ural Oguz; Cengiz Kara; Ali Unsal
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 2.606

7.  The Hickman peel-away sheath: alternative for pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  M Helal; T Black; J Lockhart; T E Figueroa
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Comparison of intrarenal pelvic pressure during micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy and conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Abdulkadir Tepeler; Tolga Akman; Mesrur Selcuk Silay; Muzaffer Akcay; Cevper Ersoz; Senad Kalkan; Abdullah Armagan; Kemal Sarica
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  A Comparison of 2 Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Techniques for the Treatment of Pediatric Kidney Stones of Sizes 10-20 mm: Microperc vs Miniperc.

Authors:  Tuna Karatag; Abdulkadir Tepeler; Mesrur Selcuk Silay; Mehmet Nuri Bodakci; Ibrahim Buldu; Mansur Daggulli; Namik Kemal Hatipoglu; Mustafa Okan Istanbulluoglu; Abdullah Armagan
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: yes but when? A multicentre retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Murat M Rifaioglu; Kadir Onem; Ibrahim Buldu; Tuna Karatag; Mustafa Okan Istanbulluoglu
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.436

View more
  5 in total

1.  How can the operation time be shortened by reducing the tract size?

Authors:  Kadir Yildirim; Namik Kemal Hatipoglu
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Pooled-analysis of efficacy and safety of minimally invasive versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Jun Wu; Guifeng Sang; Yuhua Liu; Ludeng Liu; Zhipeng Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Consultation on kidney stones, Copenhagen 2019: lithotripsy in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Tomas Andri Axelsson; Cecilia Cracco; Mahesh Desai; Mudhar Nazar Hasan; Thomas Knoll; Emanuele Montanari; Daniel Pérez-Fentes; Michael Straub; Kay Thomas; James C Williams; Marianne Brehmer; Palle J S Osther
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Role of Minimally Invasive (Micro and Ultra-mini) PCNL for Adult Urinary Stone Disease in the Modern Era: Evidence from a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Patrick Jones; Muhammad Elmussareh; Omar M Aboumarzouk; Phillip Mucksavage; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Mini versus ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in a paediatric population.

Authors:  Dilip K Mishra; Sonia Bhatt; Sundaram Palaniappan; Talamanchi V K Reddy; Vinothkumar Rajenthiran; Y L Sreeranga; Madhu S Agrawal
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2021-06-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.