| Literature DB >> 27170277 |
Tolga Karakan1, Muhammet Fatih Kilinc2, Omer Gokhan Doluoglu3, Yildiray Yildiz3, Cem Nedim Yuceturk3, Murat Bagcioglu4, Mehmet Ali Karagöz3, Okan Bas5, Berkan Resorlu6.
Abstract
To compare the success and complications of ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UPNL) and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SPNL) techniques. We prospectively analyzed 50 patients who underwent SPNL, and 47 patients who underwent UPNL. The patients with a stone size equal to or smaller than 25 mm and we used flipping a coin as the randomization technique. The mean stone size was 20.9 ± 3.6 mm in SPNL, and 20.3 ± 3.0 mm in ultra-mini PNL groups. Stone free rates were 88 % (44/50 patients) and 89.3 % (42/47 patients) in SPNL and UPNL groups, respectively, without any significant difference in between (p = 0.33). No major complications were seen in the UPNL group. PNL has been modified into micro PNL and UPNL parallel to the technological advances to decrease the complications of PNL. When performed as we do UPNL may be an alternative method to SPNL without any additional smaller-calibred nephroscope and with a similar high success rate.Entities:
Keywords: Operative complication; Percutaneous lithotripsy; Urolithiasis
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27170277 DOI: 10.1007/s00240-016-0890-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Urolithiasis ISSN: 2194-7228 Impact factor: 3.436