Literature DB >> 2717005

Which factors affect reported headache incidences after lumbar myelography? A statistical analysis of publications in the literature.

T Sand1.   

Abstract

Nineteen publications were reviewed and subjected to a combined statistical analysis (meta-analysis) regarding the influence of study design factors upon reported headache and total symptom incidences after lumbar iohexol myelography. A significant association was found between reported side effects on one hand and needle diameter, follow up time and the method of questioning respectively on the other. The combination of long follow-up time and specific questioning and the combination between larger diameter (20G) needles and long follow-up time, both seemed to be strong predictors for reporting high side effect incidences. Nine studies were similarly analyzed regarding the influence of early ambulation and contrast type upon reported headache incidences. Early ambulation significantly increased headache after iohexol or iopamidol lumbar myelography as opposed to metrizamide myelography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2717005     DOI: 10.1007/BF00342031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  32 in total

1.  Lumbar puncture reactions; relative importance of physiological and psychological factors.

Authors:  F C REDLICH; B E MOORE; I KIMBELL
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1946 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.312

2.  Lumbar myelography with amipaque.

Authors:  L Irstam
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Side effects after diagnostic lumbar puncture and lumbar iohexol myelography.

Authors:  T Sand; L J Stovner; L Dale; R Salvesen
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  A randomized, double-blind clinical trial comparing the 22 versus 26 gauge needle in the production of the post-lumbar puncture syndrome in normal individuals.

Authors:  W W Tourtellotte; W G Henderson; R P Tucker; O Gilland; J E Walker; E Kokman
Journal:  Headache       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 5.887

5.  Experience with iohexol in lumbar myelography.

Authors:  K Ericson; T Hindmarsh; J Hannerz
Journal:  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh)       Date:  1983

6.  Iohexol versus metrizamide for lumbar myelography: double-blind trial.

Authors:  T O Gabrielsen; S S Gebarski; J E Knake; J T Latack; P J Yang; J T Hoff
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Adverse reactions after iohexol lumbar myelography: influence of postprocedural positioning.

Authors:  I K Kuuliala; H J Göransson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Tolerance of iohexol, iopamidol, and metrizamide in lumbar myelography.

Authors:  C M Elkin; A M Levan; N E Leeds
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1986-12

9.  Radiculography: is routine bed rest really necessary?

Authors:  P Macpherson; E Teasdale; P Y Macpherson
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 2.350

10.  Myelography with iohexol (Omnipaque); a clinical report with special reference to the adverse effects.

Authors:  I O Skalpe; P Nakstad
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.804

View more
  7 in total

1.  Side effects after ambulatory lumbar iohexol myelography.

Authors:  T Sand; G Myhr; L J Stovner; L G Dale; A Tangerud
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  The contribution of needle size and other factors to headache following myelography.

Authors:  P B Harrison
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Headache after lumbar iohexol myelography: the influence of a history of headaches and early ambulation.

Authors:  D M Hallam; N M Sonne; G S Jensen; P Ahlgren
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Side effects after lumbar iohexol myelography. Relation to radiological diagnosis, sex and age.

Authors:  T Sand; G Myhr; L J Stovner; L G Dale
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Frequency and severity of headache after lumbar myelography using a 25-gauge pencil-point (Whitacre) spinal needle.

Authors:  H Quaynor; A Tronstad; O Heldaas
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Patient attitudes to myelography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging when examined for suspected lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  M J Albeck; B Danneskiold-Samsøe
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.216

7.  Use of a 22-gauge Whitacre needle to reduce the incidence of side effects after lumbar myelography: a prospective randomised study comparing Whitacre and Quincke spinal needles.

Authors:  O N Pedersen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.315

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.