Literature DB >> 27169589

Femoral hernia: reappraisal of low repair with the conical mesh plug.

A Pangeni1, V C Shakya2, A R M Shrestha2, R Pandit2, B Byanjankar2, S Rai3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Femoral hernias, rare among groin hernias, have been dealt with using various well-established techniques in emergency and elective settings. Lockwood's description and its various modifications have been used for decades. We here describe again a simple and elegant technique for femoral hernia repair using a conical mesh plug performed in a series of 31 patients.
METHOD: A prospective study of femoral hernia repair in 31 patients via a low inguinal approach using an improvised conical mesh plug is presented. Patients were followed up for any recurrence as the primary end point. The incidence of morbidity including chronic groin pain was recorded.
RESULTS: Thirty-two hernias in 31 patients were managed in 2 years. The majority of patients were female (94 %) with a median age of 60 (16-70) years. Primary femoral hernias were preponderant with the majority on the left (81 %). In an average follow-up period of 18 months, there were no recurrences, minimal morbidity (3 %) and no incidence of chronic inguinodynia.
CONCLUSION: The low inguinal repair with a conical mesh plug is easily reproducible, elegant and probably the best method for femoral hernia repair.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conical mesh plug; Femoral hernia; Low inguinal repair

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27169589     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-016-1500-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  15 in total

1.  Complications associated with the plug-and-patch method of inguinal herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  K A LeBlanc
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  The tension-free hernioplasty.

Authors:  I L Lichtenstein; A G Shulman; P K Amid; M M Montllor
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Sutureless technique: second version.

Authors:  A I Gilbert; M F Graham
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Problem of femoral hernia.

Authors:  J L Ponka; B E Brush
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1971-04

5.  Sutureless repair of inguinal hernia.

Authors:  A I Gilbert
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Migrating mesh plug: complication of a well-established hernia repair technique.

Authors:  Matthew L Moorman; Phillip D Price
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 0.688

7.  Prolene plug repair for femoral hernia.

Authors:  S M Allan; R M Heddle
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  A femoral "umbrella" for femoral hernia repair.

Authors:  R Bendavid
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1987-08

9.  Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair in femoral hernia without fixation of the mesh.

Authors:  Pankaj Garg; Mohamed Ismail
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  Mini-mesh repair for femoral hernia.

Authors:  Hakan Kulacoglu
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2014-07-12
View more
  3 in total

1.  Proportion of femoral hernia repairs performed for recurrence in the United States.

Authors:  B L Murphy; D S Ubl; J Zhang; E B Habermann; D Farley; K Paley
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  FEMORAL HERNIA: UNCOMMON, BUT ASSOCIATED WITH POTENTIALLY SEVERE COMPLICATIONS.

Authors:  Julio Cezar Uili Coelho; Faissal Nemer Hajar; Gabriela Araujo Moreira; Andréa Virmond El Hosni; Bruna Freitas Saenger; Yan Sacha Hass Aguilera; Marco Aurelio Raeder da Costa; Christiano Marlo Paggi Claus
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2021-10-15

Review 3.  Fascinating history of groin hernias: Comprehensive recognition of anatomy, classic considerations for herniorrhaphy, and current controversies in hernioplasty.

Authors:  Tomohide Hori; Daiki Yasukawa
Journal:  World J Methodol       Date:  2021-07-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.