| Literature DB >> 27168771 |
Abstract
The abundance of protein and its functional diversity in living systems makes it essential for virtually all life processes. Dietary protein and amino acid requirements are affected by age, body size, body composition, physiological state, and the level of energy output. The requirement for dietary protein is based on the indispensable amino acids under all conditions and under specific physiological and pathological conditions as well as the synthesis of dispensable amino acids and other nitrogen-containing compounds. Previous findings have shown the influence of early intake of proteins on the development of overweight in healthy children. The present review focused on the possible association (if any) between protein intake and later development of obesity. The aim is to benefit physicians, dieticians as well as parents to understand future consequences of incorrect dietary habits in young adolescents and encourage healthy dietary habits to avoid obesity.Entities:
Keywords: diet; infant; obesity; protein intake
Year: 2016 PMID: 27168771 PMCID: PMC4840493 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2016.3137
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Advantages and disadvantages of dietary assessment methods.
| Dietary assessment | Method | Advantages and disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Food record | Frees participants from relying on memory | Sets a burden on participants |
| Includes a specific time period | Proposes a challenge for participants to record foods not consumed within the home | |
| Allows investigators to be trained in groups | Alters dietary habits of participants in some cases | |
| Offers absolute and relative intakes | Requires participants to have literacy and numeracy skills | |
| Proposes a high cost | ||
| Challenges feasibility for large studies | ||
| Proposes a burden on participants due to necessary multiple records | ||
| 24-h recall | Frees participants from requiring literacy or numeracy skills | Requires participants to rely on memory for recall |
| Allows dietary habits of participants to be left unaltered | Proposes a challenge for estimating food quantity | |
| Provides a low burden for participants | Requires training of investigators | |
| Provides a quick assessment | Proposes a high cost | |
| Includes a specific time period | Challenges feasibility for large studies | |
| Offers automated data entry | Proposes a burden on participants due to necessary multiple records | |
| Food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) | Allows dietary habits of participants to be left unaltered | Requires participants to rely on memory for recall |
| Offers a low burden for participants | Requires participants to have literacy and numeracy skills | |
| Frees the training of investigators | Proposes a challenge for estimating food quantity | |
| Allows administration in multiple formats | Bypasses food descriptions | |
| Offers a quick and inexpensive assessment | Bypasses assessment of meal patterns | |
| Allows automated data entry | Limits data when FFQ is nutrient specific | |
| Allows practicality for large studies | ||
| Offers assessment of total diet and select nutrients | ||
| Offers assessment of current or past diet | ||
| Allows participants to be divided into groups based on intake | ||
| Targeted diet and/or behavior assessments | Allows dietary habits of participants to be left unaltered | Requires participants to rely on memory for recall |
| Provides a low burden for participants | Requires participants to have literacy and numeracy skills | |
| Allows practicality for large studies | Requires research before developing assessment | |
| Offers a simple and inexpensive assessment | Challenges validity | |
| Allows automated data entry | Bypasses the collection of of nutrient intakes | |
| Allows trends to be monitored | Limits food intake information | |
| Allows behaviors and environmental | ||
| information to be assessed |