Gilberto Ramirez1, Rebecca Cabral1, Margaret Patterson1, Ben T Schoenbachler2, Deborah Bedell1, Bryce D Smith3, Claudia Vellozzi1, Geoff A Beckett1. 1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Viral Hepatitis, Atlanta, GA. 2. Oak Ridge Institutes for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, TN. 3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Viral Hepatitis, Atlanta, GA; Current affiliation: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Diabetes Translation, Translation, Health Education, and Evaluation Branch, Atlanta, GA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In 2012, CDC's Division of Viral Hepatitis launched a public health initiative to increase hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection testing for those at risk and to improve linkage to medical care for those infected. We describe testing outcomes of previously unidentified people at risk for HBV and HCV infection and the lessons learned while linking patients to care. METHODS: CDC's Hepatitis Testing and Linkage to Care (HepTLC) initiative provided 34 financial awards to U.S. organizations that serve people at risk for viral hepatitis, 25 of which focused on HCV and nine of which focused on HBV. Grantees offered testing and test result notification to people at risk for HBV and/or HCV infection, as well as counseling, referral, and verification or notification of linkage to care for people with positive test results. We entered demographic data, self-reported risk factors, country of origin (for HBV), and testing outcomes into a confidential database. RESULTS: The 34 grantees tested 87,860 people at more than 260 sites in 17 states. Of the 23,144 people tested for HBV, 1,317 (6%) were positive. Of the 64,716 people tested for HCV, 57,570 (89%) received an HCV antibody (anti-HCV) test, of whom 7,580 (13%) tested anti-HCV positive. Of the 4,765 people who received an HCV RNA test, 3,449 (72%) tested positive. Of the 4,766 people who tested positive for either HBV or HCV infection, 2,116 (44%) were linked to care. CONCLUSION: Interventions targeting people at risk for HBV and HCV infection reached a substantial number of people for whom testing is recommended and identified a large proportion of those who had previously unrecognized infection. Patient navigation was critical for follow-up and linkage to care.
OBJECTIVE: In 2012, CDC's Division of Viral Hepatitis launched a public health initiative to increase hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection testing for those at risk and to improve linkage to medical care for those infected. We describe testing outcomes of previously unidentified people at risk for HBV and HCV infection and the lessons learned while linking patients to care. METHODS: CDC's Hepatitis Testing and Linkage to Care (HepTLC) initiative provided 34 financial awards to U.S. organizations that serve people at risk for viral hepatitis, 25 of which focused on HCV and nine of which focused on HBV. Grantees offered testing and test result notification to people at risk for HBV and/or HCV infection, as well as counseling, referral, and verification or notification of linkage to care for people with positive test results. We entered demographic data, self-reported risk factors, country of origin (for HBV), and testing outcomes into a confidential database. RESULTS: The 34 grantees tested 87,860 people at more than 260 sites in 17 states. Of the 23,144 people tested for HBV, 1,317 (6%) were positive. Of the 64,716 people tested for HCV, 57,570 (89%) received an HCV antibody (anti-HCV) test, of whom 7,580 (13%) tested anti-HCV positive. Of the 4,765 people who received an HCV RNA test, 3,449 (72%) tested positive. Of the 4,766 people who tested positive for either HBV or HCV infection, 2,116 (44%) were linked to care. CONCLUSION: Interventions targeting people at risk for HBV and HCV infection reached a substantial number of people for whom testing is recommended and identified a large proportion of those who had previously unrecognized infection. Patient navigation was critical for follow-up and linkage to care.
Authors: Cindy M Weinbaum; Ian Williams; Eric E Mast; Susan A Wang; Lyn Finelli; Annemarie Wasley; Stephanie M Neitzel; John W Ward Journal: MMWR Recomm Rep Date: 2008-09-19
Authors: Philip R Spradling; Loralee Rupp; Anne C Moorman; Mei Lu; Eyasu H Teshale; Stuart C Gordon; Cynthia Nakasato; Joseph A Boscarino; Emily M Henkle; David R Nerenz; Maxine M Denniston; Scott D Holmberg Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2012-08-08 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Bryce D Smith; Rebecca L Morgan; Geoff A Beckett; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Deborah Holtzman; Chong-Gee Teo; Amy Jewett; Brittney Baack; David B Rein; Nita Patel; Miriam Alter; Anthony Yartel; John W Ward Journal: MMWR Recomm Rep Date: 2012-08-17
Authors: Dale J Hu; Jian Xing; Rania A Tohme; Youlian Liao; Henry Pollack; John W Ward; Scott D Holmberg Journal: Hepatology Date: 2013-08-06 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Maxine M Denniston; Ruth B Jiles; Jan Drobeniuc; R Monina Klevens; John W Ward; Geraldine M McQuillan; Scott D Holmberg Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2014-03-04 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Eva van Oorschot; Özgür M Koc; Astrid Ml Oude Lashof; Inge Hm van Loo; Robin Ackens; Dirk Posthouwer; Ger H Koek Journal: J Virus Erad Date: 2022-06-20
Authors: Bijou R Hunt; Christopher Ahmed; Kimberly Ramirez-Mercado; Christopher Patron; Nancy R Glick Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2020-11-11 Impact factor: 2.792