Literature DB >> 27168356

Hospital and Payer Costs Associated With Surgical Complications.

Mark A Healy1, Andrew J Mullard2, Darrell A Campbell1, Justin B Dimick1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Increased costs of surgical complications have been borne mostly by third-party payers. However, numerous policy changes aimed at incentivizing high-quality care shift more of this burden to hospitals. The potential effect of these policies on hospitals and payers is poorly understood.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate costs associated with surgical quality and the relative financial burden on hospitals and payers. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We performed an observational study merging complication data from the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative and internal cost accounting data from the University of Michigan Health System from January 2, 2008, through April 16, 2015; the merged files from these data were created between June 5, 2015, and July 22, 2015. A total of 5120 episodes of surgical care for 24 surgical procedure groups (17 general surgical, 6 vascular, and 1 gynecologic) were examined. We report unadjusted and log-transformed risk-adjusted costs. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: We compared hospital costs, third-party reimbursement (ie, payer costs), and hospital profit margin for cases with and without complications.
RESULTS: The mean (SD) age of the 5120 patients was 56.0 (16.4) years, and 2883 (56.3) were female. The overall complication rate was 14.5% (744 of 5120) for all procedures, 14.7% (580 of 3956) for general surgery, 15.5% (128 of 828) for vascular surgery, and 10.7% (36 of 336) for gynecologic surgery. For all studied procedures, mean hospital costs were $19 626 (119%) higher for patients with complications ($36 060) compared with those without complications ($16 434). Mean third-party reimbursement was $18 497 (106%) higher for patients with complications ($35 870) compared with those without complications ($17 373). Consequently, with risk adjustment, overall profit margin decreased from 5.8% for patients without complications to 0.1% for patients with complications. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Hospitals and third-party payers experience increased costs with surgical complications, with hospitals experiencing a reduction in profit margin. Both hospitals and payers appear to currently have financial incentives to promote surgical quality improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27168356     DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.0773

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Surg        ISSN: 2168-6254            Impact factor:   14.766


  42 in total

1.  Hospital Quality and Medicare Expenditures for Bariatric Surgery in the United States.

Authors:  Andrew M Ibrahim; Amir A Ghaferi; Jyothi R Thumma; Justin B Dimick
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Survival outcome and perioperative complication related to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel for advanced ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hiroko Machida; Hideki Tokunaga; Koji Matsuo; Noriomi Matsumura; Yoichi Kobayashi; Tsutomu Tabata; Masanori Kaneuchi; Satoru Nagase; Mikio Mikami
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 4.424

3.  Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program Implementation in 2 Surgical Populations in an Integrated Health Care Delivery System.

Authors:  Vincent X Liu; Efren Rosas; Judith Hwang; Eric Cain; Anne Foss-Durant; Molly Clopp; Mengfei Huang; Derrick C Lee; Alex Mustille; Patricia Kipnis; Stephen Parodi
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 4.  Quality Versus Costs Related to Gastrointestinal Surgery: Disentangling the Value Proposition.

Authors:  Rohan Shah; Adrian Diaz; Marzia Tripepi; Fabio Bagante; Diamantis I Tsilimigras; Nikolaos Machairas; Fragiska Sigala; Dimitrios Moris; Savio George Barreto; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Synergistic Effects of Perioperative Complications on 30-Day Mortality Following Hepatopancreatic Surgery.

Authors:  Katiuscha Merath; Qinyu Chen; Fabio Bagante; Ozgur Akgul; Jay J Idrees; Mary Dillhoff; Jordan M Cloyd; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  The Kaiser Permanente Northern California Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program: Design, Development, and Implementation.

Authors:  Vincent X Liu; Efren Rosas; Judith C Hwang; Eric Cain; Anne Foss-Durant; Molly Clopp; Mengfei Huang; Alexander Mustille; Vivian M Reyes; Shirley S Paulson; Michelle Caughey; Stephen Parodi
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2017

7.  The effect of smoking on 30-day outcomes in elective hernia repair.

Authors:  John O DeLancey; Eddie Blay; D Brock Hewitt; Kathryn Engelhardt; Karl Y Bilimoria; Jane L Holl; David D Odell; Anthony D Yang; Jonah J Stulberg
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Clinical Effectiveness of the Elder-Friendly Approaches to the Surgical Environment Initiative in Emergency General Surgery.

Authors:  Rachel G Khadaroo; Lindsey M Warkentin; Adrian S Wagg; Raj S Padwal; Fiona Clement; Xiaoming Wang; William D Buie; Jayna Holroyd-Leduc
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 14.766

9.  Use of Machine Learning for Prediction of Patient Risk of Postoperative Complications After Liver, Pancreatic, and Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Katiuscha Merath; J Madison Hyer; Rittal Mehta; Ayesha Farooq; Fabio Bagante; Kota Sahara; Diamantis I Tsilimigras; Eliza Beal; Anghela Z Paredes; Lu Wu; Aslam Ejaz; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Association of County-Level Social Vulnerability with Elective Versus Non-elective Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Adrian Diaz; Elizabeth Barmash; Rosevine Azap; Anghela Z Paredes; J Madison Hyer; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.