Literature DB >> 27168082

Early surgery within 2 days for hip fracture is not reliable as healthcare quality indicator.

Alejandro Lizaur-Utrilla1, Daniel Martinez-Mendez2, Isabel Collados-Maestre2, Francisco A Miralles-Muñoz2, Luis Marco-Gomez2, Fernando A Lopez-Prats3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze prospectively the influence of the timing of surgery on morbidity and mortality, and to assess whether the early surgery within 2 days admission may be a reliably healthcare quality indicator.
METHODS: Prospective observational study of 628 patients age 60 or older who had been co-managed between surgeons and internists. Based on the literature, many potential factors influencing outcomes were collected to control confounding regard to surgery delay, complications and mortality. Multivariate logistic regression and Cox regression models were used to assess effects on the delay and mortality, respectively.
RESULTS: Mean Charlson index was 2.3, and 284 patients had at least 3 comorbidities. Mean timing of surgery was 3.6 days (range 0-20). 418 patients were fit for surgery, of which 180 underwent surgery within 2 days. Delay for surgery more than 2 days was significantly associated with ASA >2, Charlson >2 and anticoagulant therapy. Medical complications were not significantly associated with delayed surgery more than 2 days. Mortality rate was 0.9% in-hospital, 3.4 at 1 month, 7.0% at 3 months, and 13.6% at 12 months. There were no significant differences in in-hospital, 3-month or 1-year mortality between patients operated within 2 days and those operated at 3-4 days, but delayed more than 4 days was associated with higher 1-year mortality. Likewise, patients readmitted within 30 days had higher in-hospital mortality. Excluding unfit for surgery patients at admission, there was no significant difference in 3-month or 1-year mortality between patients operated within 2 days and those with delayed surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Delaying surgery up to 4 days was not associated with higher morbidity or mortality rates. We recommend concentrating more on preoperative optimizing the condition of patient with sufficient medical treatment rather than being bound by a universal timing of surgery.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Hip fracture; Mortality; Predictors; Timing of surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27168082     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.04.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  13 in total

1.  Mortality effects of timing alternatives for hip fracture surgery.

Authors:  Boris Sobolev; Pierre Guy; Katie Jane Sheehan; Lisa Kuramoto; Jason M Sutherland; Adrian R Levy; James A Blair; Eric Bohm; Jason D Kim; Edward J Harvey; Suzanne N Morin; Lauren Beaupre; Michael Dunbar; Susan Jaglal; James Waddell
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Association of Overlapping Surgery With Increased Risk for Complications Following Hip Surgery: A Population-Based, Matched Cohort Study.

Authors:  Bheeshma Ravi; Daniel Pincus; David Wasserstein; Anand Govindarajan; Anjie Huang; Peter C Austin; Richard Jenkinson; Patrick D G Henry; J Michael Paterson; Hans J Kreder
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 21.873

3.  Hip fracture time-to-surgery and mortality revisited: mitigating comorbidity confounding by effect of holidays on surgical timing.

Authors:  Siu Him Janus Wong; Xinshuo Christian Fang; King Hang Dennis Yee; Tak Man Wong; Cheuk Ting Terence Pun; Tak Wing Lau; Ka Li Frankie Leung
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Patient and system factors of time to surgery after hip fracture: a scoping review.

Authors:  Katie J Sheehan; Boris Sobolev; Yuri F Villán Villán; Pierre Guy
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  Triaging Total Hip Arthroplasty During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  James M Rizkalla; Brian P Gladnick; Aamir A Bhimani; Dorian S Wood; Kurt J Kitziger; Paul C Peters
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2020-08

6.  Epidemiology, treatment and mortality of trochanteric and subtrochanteric hip fractures: data from the Swedish fracture register.

Authors:  Leif Mattisson; Alicja Bojan; Anders Enocson
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Quality indicators for hip fracture care, a systematic review.

Authors:  S C Voeten; P Krijnen; D M Voeten; J H Hegeman; M W J M Wouters; I B Schipper
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Feasibility of using administrative data for identifying medical reasons to delay hip fracture surgery: a Canadian database study.

Authors:  Pierre Guy; Katie J Sheehan; Suzanne N Morin; James Waddell; Michael Dunbar; Edward Harvey; Susan Sirett; Boris Sobolev; Lisa Kuramoto; Michael Tang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  No rest for elderly femur fracture patients: early surgery and early ambulation decrease mortality.

Authors:  Alessandro Aprato; Marco Bechis; Marco Buzzone; Alessandro Bistolfi; Walter Daghino; Alessandro Massè
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2020-08-30

10.  Impact of timing of surgery in elderly hip fracture patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thomas Klestil; Christoph Röder; Christoph Stotter; Birgit Winkler; Stefan Nehrer; Martin Lutz; Irma Klerings; Gernot Wagner; Gerald Gartlehner; Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.