In this letter, we demonstrate the formation of unique Ga/GaAs/Si nanowire heterostructures, which were successfully implemented in nanoscale light-emitting devices with visible room temperature electroluminescence. Based on our recent approach for the integration of InAs/Si heterostructures into Si nanowires by ion implantation and flash lamp annealing, we developed a routine that has proven to be suitable for the monolithic integration of GaAs nanocrystallite segments into the core of silicon nanowires. The formation of a Ga segment adjacent to longer GaAs nanocrystallites resulted in Schottky-diode-like I/V characteristics with distinct electroluminescence originating from the GaAs nanocrystallite for the nanowire device operated in the reverse breakdown regime. The observed electroluminescence was ascribed to radiative band-to-band recombinations resulting in distinct emission peaks and a low contribution due to intraband transition, which were also observed under forward bias. Simulations of the obtained nanowire heterostructure confirmed the proposed impact ionization process responsible for hot carrier luminescence. This approach may enable a new route for on-chip photonic devices used for light emission or detection purposes.
In this letter, we demonstrate the formation of unique Ga/GaAs/Si nanowire heterostructures, which were successfully implemented in nanoscale light-emitting devices with visible room temperature electroluminescence. Based on our recent approach for the integration of InAs/Si heterostructures into Si nanowires by ion implantation and flash lamp annealing, we developed a routine that has proven to be suitable for the monolithic integration of GaAs nanocrystallite segments into the core of silicon nanowires. The formation of a Ga segment adjacent to longer GaAs nanocrystallites resulted in Schottky-diode-like I/V characteristics with distinct electroluminescence originating from the GaAs nanocrystallite for the nanowire device operated in the reverse breakdown regime. The observed electroluminescence was ascribed to radiative band-to-band recombinations resulting in distinct emission peaks and a low contribution due to intraband transition, which were also observed under forward bias. Simulations of the obtained nanowire heterostructure confirmed the proposed impact ionization process responsible for hot carrier luminescence. This approach may enable a new route for on-chip photonic devices used for light emission or detection purposes.
A successful implementation of a new class of materials or means of
processing has a potential impact on long-term future technology nodes.
Fundamental investigations of electronic and optical properties of
nanowire (NW) heterostructures thus triggered tremendous research
on novel device concepts.[1−3] Particularly, integrating photonic
devices into the Si platform is a challenge that requires the development
of elaborate device designs.[4] Nanoscale
Si-based photonic devices would provide full compatibility with mature
IC manufacturing processes; yet owing to the inherent disadvantages
of the indirect Si band gap, no efficient light emission can be obtained.
A hybrid Si platform, integrating III–V functionality into
Si nanostructures, would give access to a wide range of high-speed
electronic and high-performance photonic applications. However, the
diverse natures of the III–V and Si device approaches, material
technologies, and processing have posed a significant obstacle in
the route for Si-based hybrid optoelectronic systems in the past.
Within the last years, a few approaches for Si-based hybrid NW formation
via bottom-up growth techniques[5,6] or in combination with
substrate etching[7] were presented, which
are restricted to semiconductors, with limitations in epitaxial integration
and in retaining the NW morphology. Recently, we published a novel
approach for integrating III–V nanocrystallites (NCs) into
Si NWs by combining ion implantation and flash lamp annealing, yielding
InAs/Si NW heterostructures.[8] Within this
study we present this approach to be capable for integrating GaAs
NCs into crystalline Si NWs. Due to a modification of the ion implantation
routine, NCs with increased axial lengths are obtained, exhibiting
a metallic Ga segment adjacent to the GaAs NCs. Such wired NC configuration
ensures directed current flow through the abrupt heterointerfaces.We achieved the monolithic integration of GaAs and Ga/GaAs NCs
into Si NWs by exploring ion implantation and flash lamp annealing
(FLA) routines. Such application of mature semiconductor processing
techniques[9] allows to process wafer-scale
NW samples along with excellent control of NW morphologies. The main
processing steps for NW heterostructure formation are sketched in Figure a.
Figure 1
Processing and material
characterization of Ga/GaAs/Si NW heterostructures. (a) Processing
scheme: epitaxial VLS-grown Si ⟨111⟩ NWs covered with
20 nm SiO2; room temperature ion implantation of Ga and
As (2 at% each) with samples mounted on a 45° tilted and rotating
specimen holder; formation of wired GaAs NCs after 20 ms FLA (54.2
J/cm2). (b) SEM image of a single Ga/GaAs/Si NW heterostructure
with the respective μ-Raman spectrum acquired from the center
of the GaAs NC (red arrow). Denoted peaks are identified as (I) GaAs
TO, 272 cm–1; (II) GaAs surface phonon, 287 cm–1; (III) local vibrational modes of Si-doped GaAs,
360–410 cm–1; (IV) nanocrystalline Si, 487.5
cm–1; and (V) Si zone center phonon mode, 517.9
cm–1 (see Supporting Information 3 for details). (c) SEM image of a Ga/GaAs/Si NW heterostructure
with SiO2 shell and Si, Ga, and As maps acquired from TEM-EDX
analysis shown as a color overlay. HRTEM detail micrographs of the
axial interfaces are shown in the right panel along with the respective
fast Fourier transforms of the crystalline zinc-blende Si and GaAs
and amorphous Ga segments in the insets.
Processing and material
characterization of Ga/GaAs/Si NW heterostructures. (a) Processing
scheme: epitaxial VLS-grown Si ⟨111⟩ NWs covered with
20 nm SiO2; room temperature ion implantation of Ga and
As (2 at% each) with samples mounted on a 45° tilted and rotating
specimen holder; formation of wired GaAs NCs after 20 ms FLA (54.2
J/cm2). (b) SEM image of a single Ga/GaAs/Si NW heterostructure
with the respective μ-Raman spectrum acquired from the center
of the GaAs NC (red arrow). Denoted peaks are identified as (I) GaAs
TO, 272 cm–1; (II) GaAs surface phonon, 287 cm–1; (III) local vibrational modes of Si-doped GaAs,
360–410 cm–1; (IV) nanocrystalline Si, 487.5
cm–1; and (V) Si zone center phonon mode, 517.9
cm–1 (see Supporting Information 3 for details). (c) SEM image of a Ga/GaAs/Si NW heterostructure
with SiO2 shell and Si, Ga, and As maps acquired from TEM-EDX
analysis shown as a color overlay. HRTEM detail micrographs of the
axial interfaces are shown in the right panel along with the respective
fast Fourier transforms of the crystalline zinc-blendeSi and GaAs
and amorphous Ga segments in the insets.The samples consisted of ⟨111⟩ oriented zinc-blendeSi NWs epitaxially grown on Si(111) substrates via the gold-catalyzed
vapor–liquid–solid (VLS) approach.[10] A low pressure chemical vapor deposition system was utilized
for NW growth, using SiH4 (2% diluted in He) as precursor
gas, a growth temperature of T = 788 K and a total
pressure of p = 4 mbar, which resulted in epitaxial
and single crystalline NWs with typical lengths of 10 μm and
mean diameters of about 130 nm. Prior to high fluence implantation
of Ga and As ions, the gold catalyst was removed, and a 20 nm thick
SiO2 layer had to be deposited by plasma enhanced chemical
vapor deposition, acting as a protective mold during implantation
and millisecond FLA. In order to achieve a homogeneous ion distribution
and to avoid bending of the NWs due to high fluence ion bombardment,[11] samples were mounted on a 45° tilted stage
and continuously rotated during ion implantation. Due to nanostructure-related
peculiarities of ion beam induced sputtering, implantation parameters
were derived from 3D Monte Carlo simulations using iradina.[12] Ga and As ions were implanted alternatingly,
resulting in a nominal concentration of 2 at % Ga and 2 at % As inside
the NW core. Full amorphization and a significant shortening as well
as a change of the NW cross-section from hexagonal to circular was
observed due to plastic deformation of NWs during ion implantation.[13] Remarkably, the SiO2 shell was found
to persist during implantation with little intermixing at the interface
to the Si core (see Supporting Information 1). Finally the phase separation and actual formation of NW heterostructures
by liquid phase epitaxy (LPE)[14] was induced
by a 3 min preheating at 600 °C and subsequent 20 ms FLA, whereby
the SiO2 shell stabilized the molten core of the NWs. FLA
was performed in Ar atmosphere with a flash energy of 54.2 J/cm2, resulting in peak sample temperatures of approximately 1470
K.[8] Within the cooling period after FLA,
GaAs NCs formed with lengths varying from approximately 10 nm to 1
μm (cf. Supporting Information 2).
In addition, an adjacent Ga segment was observed for NCs exceeding
a length of about 75 nm.The composition, morphology, and crystallinity
of such obtained NW heterostructures were analyzed in detail by μ-Raman
spectroscopy, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and energy dispersive
X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). Figure b shows a typical μ-Raman spectrum acquired from
the GaAs NC depicted in the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image.
The main Raman features were identified as the transverse optical
(TO) phonon mode of crystalline GaAs (peak I), a GaAs related surface
phonon mode due to the cylindrical shape of the GaAs NC (peak II),[15] and GaAs local vibrational modes (peak III).[16] The occurrence of GaAs local vibrational modes
indicates a high concentration of Si atoms occupying Ga or As lattice
sites. As the excitation laser spot exceeds the GaAs NC size, Raman
features arising from the adjacent Si NW (peak IV, V) were also detected
(see Supporting Information 3).Extensive
high resolution TEM (HRTEM) and EDX analysis confirmed composition
and crystallinity of both the Si and GaAs segments with abrupt interfaces
as indicated by Raman investigations (see Supporting Information 4). Although a rapid annealing step was applied,
consisting of melting of the NW core during the 20 ms FLA step and
recrystallization during subsequent cooling, only a low number of
crystallographic defects of the NW heterostructure were observed in
TEM investigations (see Supporting Information 5). As mentioned above, for larger GaAs NCs, we observed the formation
of amorphous Ga segments, separating the GaAs NCs from the Si NW core.
Previous investigations indicated a liquid state for nanoscale Ga
droplets at room temperature,[17] which may
also apply for the observed amorphous structure of the Ga segments.
Further EDX revealed As within the recrystallized Si NWs, thus expecting
n-type doping of the Si NW. In the HRTEM images of Figure c, the respective interfaces
of the axially aligned Si/Ga/GaAs/Si segments are shown. Remarkably,
the Si NWs, although fully amorphous after ion implantation, recrystallize
in ⟨111⟩ directions along the NW axis during LPE, which
is also the predominant growth direction for VLS-grown Si NWs with
diameters above 40 nm.[18] The embedded zinc-blendeGaAs NCs adopt the crystallite direction of the Si NW as shown in
the fast Fourier transform patterns in Figure c. Furthermore, the amorphous Ga segment
formed next to larger GaAs NCs exhibits an abrupt interface to both
the GaAs and the Si NWs.To determine the electrical transport
properties of wired GaAs NCs embedded in Si NWs, individual NW heterostructures
were integrated in four-terminal and two-terminal (cf. inset in Figure a) devices resembling
a back-gated NW field effect transistor with a 120 nm thick SiO2 layer as gate dielectric and the substrate as common gate.
Electrical contacts to nanowire devices were processed by e-beam lithography,
e-beam evaporation of Ni, and lift off techniques.
Figure 2
Electrical characterization
of selected NW heterostructures. (a) I/V characteristics of a processed Si NW without NCs (NW1), a Si NW
heterostructure with a GaAs NC (NW2), and four Si NWs with Ga/GaAs
NCs (NW3–NW6). Axial lengths of the GaAs NCs are for NW2:124
nm (□), NW3:136 nm (△), NW4:180 nm (▽), NW5:245
nm (×), and NW6:469 nm (○). The inset shows the SEM image
of NW6 with electrical contacts, and the direction of the bias VSD applied to the source contact next to the
Ga segment is depicted. The drain contact and the Si substrate are
grounded. (b) Scatter diagram of |VSD|
values of measured NW heterostructures under reverse bias at |IS| = 200 nA as a function of GaAs NC length
with a linear fitting curve.
Electrical characterization
of selected NW heterostructures. (a) I/V characteristics of a processed Si NW without NCs (NW1), a Si NW
heterostructure with a GaAs NC (NW2), and four Si NWs with Ga/GaAs
NCs (NW3–NW6). Axial lengths of the GaAs NCs are for NW2:124
nm (□), NW3:136 nm (△), NW4:180 nm (▽), NW5:245
nm (×), and NW6:469 nm (○). The inset shows the SEM image
of NW6 with electrical contacts, and the direction of the bias VSD applied to the source contact next to the
Ga segment is depicted. The drain contact and the Si substrate are
grounded. (b) Scatter diagram of |VSD|
values of measured NW heterostructures under reverse bias at |IS| = 200 nA as a function of GaAs NC length
with a linear fitting curve.The I/V characteristics
of a contacted Si NW without a NC exhibits linear behavior (NW1 in Figure a) and four-terminal
measurements revealed a resistivity of 1.1 mΩ·cm. Unambiguously
n-type doping was confirmed by thermoelectric measurements on individually
contacted Si NWs (see Supporting Information 6). Assuming As as the dopant, this corresponds to a bulk impurity
concentration of approximately 8.6 × 1019 cm–3 and thus degenerate doping of the Si NWs.[19] Due to the high doping of the Si NW and the present SiO2 shell, influences of surface states or adsorbates on the electronic
structure of the NW core were assumed to be negligible. Furthermore,
the low resistivity of the Si NWs impeded the use of capacity-dependent
scanning probe microscopy to investigate NW doping.For the
NWs with GaAs NCs and Ga/GaAs hybrids, no such direct experimental
determination of the doping type could be achieved. However, as GaAs
grown from a Si-rich high temperature melt by LPE results in n-type
GaAs crystals,[20] n-type doping was also
assumed to be prevailing in the present GaAs NCs. Furthermore, rectifying
Ga/GaAs contacts only form with n-type GaAs,[21] which agrees well with the Schottky-type behavior of the Ga/GaAs
heterostructures (NW3–NW6 in Figure a). The resistivity of the GaAs NCs was measured
to be approximately 6 Ω·cm, which corresponds to an effective
impurity concentration of 1.5 × 1014 cm–3 in n-type GaAs.[19] However, Raman investigations
(cf. Supporting Information 3) indicate
considerably higher Si impurity concentrations of about 5 × 1018 cm–3.[22] Thus,
we can conclude that, due to the amphoteric nature of Si dopants in
GaAs, compensation doping results in overall moderately doped n-type
GaAs NCs.The highly n-type doped Si NWs aligned with a 124
nm long GaAs NC (NW2 in Figure a) results in a quantum-barrier-like structure with a barrier
height for conduction electrons of about 67.8 meV (see simulation
results in Supporting Information 7). In
contrast to the n-type Si NWs for which ohmic behavior was observed
(cf. NW1), a strongly nonlinear but symmetric behavior is observed,
which is typical for field-induced tunneling currents that increase
steeply when the effective tunneling barrier narrows for ascending
bias voltages. Temperature-dependent I/V measurements, at a small bias voltage of 10 mV to minimize band-bending
and tunneling effects, yielded an effective barrier height of approximately
50 meV, which is in reasonable agreement with semiclassical device
simulations (see Supporting Information 7).For NW heterostructures with a Ga segment adjacent to
the GaAs NC, the Ga/GaAs Schottky junction dominates the I/V characteristics, resulting in a distinct rectifying
behavior (NW3–NW6 in Figure a). I/V characteristics
are further labeled forward (reverse) for positive (negative) bias VSD applied to the NW end facing the Ga segment.
According to the simulated energy band diagram under forward bias
(right panel in Figure ) conduction electrons encounter the small barrier at the Si/GaAs
interface with a turn on voltage of around 0.2–0.6 V.
Figure 3
Simulated energy
band diagrams. Band diagrams of a Ga/GaAs/Si heterostructure similar
to NW4, calculated with the semiclassical device simulator Minimos-NT
under reverse (left panel), zero (center panel), and forward (right
panel) bias conditions. EV denotes the
valence band maximum and EC the conduction
band minimum. The Fermi level as well as the electron and hole quasi
Fermi levels are denoted by EF, EF,n, and EF,p, respectively.
The heterojunctions were assumed to be defect-free, and the work function
of Ga was fixed to 4.3 eV.[23] Under nonzero
bias conditions, the main drift component of the current is sketched
as electrons (Θ) entering the GaAs NC by tunneling through the
Ga/GaAs Schottky junction (reverse bias) or the Si/GaAs heterojunction
(forward bias). The cascade process responsible for generating electron–hole
(⊕) pairs due to impact ionization of hot charge carriers is
shown for the device operated under reverse bias. The inset shows
the I/V characteristics of NW4 with
marked operating points for the three bias conditions.
Simulated energy
band diagrams. Band diagrams of a Ga/GaAs/Si heterostructure similar
to NW4, calculated with the semiclassical device simulator Minimos-NT
under reverse (left panel), zero (center panel), and forward (right
panel) bias conditions. EV denotes the
valence band maximum and EC the conduction
band minimum. The Fermi level as well as the electron and hole quasi
Fermi levels are denoted by EF, EF,n, and EF,p, respectively.
The heterojunctions were assumed to be defect-free, and the work function
of Ga was fixed to 4.3 eV.[23] Under nonzero
bias conditions, the main drift component of the current is sketched
as electrons (Θ) entering the GaAs NC by tunneling through the
Ga/GaAs Schottky junction (reverse bias) or the Si/GaAs heterojunction
(forward bias). The cascade process responsible for generating electron–hole
(⊕) pairs due to impact ionization of hot charge carriers is
shown for the device operated under reverse bias. The inset shows
the I/V characteristics of NW4 with
marked operating points for the three bias conditions.For such Si NW heterostructures containing a Ga/GaAs
segment, Schottky barrier heights in the range of 186–330 meV
were obtained from temperature-dependent I/V measurements. With e the elementary charge,
χ = 4.07 eV the electron affinity and eϕm = 4.3 eV the work function of GaAs,[23] the Schottky barrier height of an ideal Ga/GaAs junction can be
calculated to eϕ = eϕm – χ ≈ 230 meV. In literature, Schottky
barrier heights of Ga/n-GaAs junctions are usually larger than 1 eV,
owing to Fermi level pinning caused by defects at the interface.[21] Thus, a reasonable low number of interface defects
due to the absence of Fermi level pinning can be assumed for the obtained
Ga/GaAs Schottky junctions within NW heterostructures.Under
reverse bias conditions, the voltage is supported across the drift
region of the Schottky contact with the maximum electric field located
at the Ga/GaAs interface. Due to a weak barrier lowering, the leakage
current rises gradually with reverse bias as thermally excited electrons
in the metal surmount the barrier. However, as the field increases
further, a fraction of high energy carriers fail to lose energy by
phonon emission, attaining energies in excess of the material bandgap
and lose energy by creating electron–hole pairs, a process
generally known as impact ionization.[24,25] At a crucial
breakdown field, these generated carriers gain sufficient energies
to induce further impact ionizations cascades leading to avalanche
carrier multiplication (left panel in Figure ).Simulations of the reverse biased
NW heterostructure yielded high impact ionization rates in the GaAs
NC next to the Schottky interface, proportional to the applied bias
(see Supporting Information 8). Since negligible
voltage is supported within the metal and the degenerately doped Si
NW, the reverse blocking capability of the Schottky rectifier is governed
by the GaAs NC, and the breakdown voltage thereby appears to be linearly
dependent on the length of the NC, as shown in Figure b.Operating the Ga/GaAs/Si NW heterostructure
devices under reverse bias in the avalanche breakdown regime resulted
in broadband light emission, clearly originating from the GaAs NCs.
In Figure an SEM
image of the two-terminal device (Figure a) and an optical microscope image (Figure b) are shown, demonstrating
distinct electroluminescence (EL) of NW4 under reverse bias conditions.
The associated EL spectrum for the device operated under reverse and
forward bias conditions is depicted in Figure c. The measured EL spectra were corrected
according to transmission data obtained from calibrating the spectroscopy
equipment with a calibrated halogen light source.
Figure 4
Room temperature EL of
a Ga/GaAs/Si NW heterostructure device. (a) SEM image, showing the
two-terminal device (NW4) with a Ga segment next to a 180 nm long
GaAs NC. (b) Optical microscope image (1 min exposure time) of the
same device under reverse bias conditions (VSD = −9.4 V, IS = −4
μA) with visible EL originating from the GaAs NC. Spectral decomposition
of the EL spot is due to artifacts of the imaging system. (c) Corrected
EL spectra acquired from NW4 under forward bias (VSD = 4.85 V, IS = 8.3 μA)
and reverse bias (VSD = −9.4 V, IS = −4 μA). Black curves are fittings
according to eq , representing
luminescence ascribed to Bremsstrahlung. Under reverse bias, band-to-band
EL is superimposed, whereas under forward bias only Bremsstrahlung
can be seen at high field conditions.
Room temperature EL of
a Ga/GaAs/Si NW heterostructure device. (a) SEM image, showing the
two-terminal device (NW4) with a Ga segment next to a 180 nm long
GaAs NC. (b) Optical microscope image (1 min exposure time) of the
same device under reverse bias conditions (VSD = −9.4 V, IS = −4
μA) with visible EL originating from the GaAs NC. Spectral decomposition
of the EL spot is due to artifacts of the imaging system. (c) Corrected
EL spectra acquired from NW4 under forward bias (VSD = 4.85 V, IS = 8.3 μA)
and reverse bias (VSD = −9.4 V, IS = −4 μA). Black curves are fittings
according to eq , representing
luminescence ascribed to Bremsstrahlung. Under reverse bias, band-to-band
EL is superimposed, whereas under forward bias only Bremsstrahlung
can be seen at high field conditions.Pronounced features were observed in the EL spectra above
the GaAs band gap energy EG = 1.42 eV,
which are assigned to radiative band-to-band (b–b) recombinations.
A continuous background in the EL spectrum extending to the near-infrared
is ascribed to intraband transitions, or Bremsstrahlung.[26,27]Under high forward biases, the weak EL appears to be consisting
of Bremsstrahlung only. Assuming a Maxwellian distribution for electrons
and a bulk density of states with simple parabolic energy bands, the
rate R for light emission ascribed to Bremsstrahlung
at an energy E is proportional to[27]with kB the Boltzmann
constant and Te the electron temperature.
Values for Te, obtained by fitting eq to EL spectra, assuming
the electron energy distribution to be reproduced by the photon energy
distribution, are in good agreement with temperatures of hot electrons
in GaAs high-electron-mobility transistors.[26]In general, considerably higher EL intensities were observed
under reverse bias conditions. Bremsstrahlung corresponding to Te = 2256 K and superimposed b–b recombinations
constitute the EL spectra, as shown in Figure c for such a reverse biased device. For a
more detailed analysis of the b–b recombination related EL,
Ga/GaAs/Si NW heterostructures with increasing GaAs NC lengths and
thus increasing breakdown voltages were investigated. Figure a shows EL spectra of three
NW heterostructures, exemplarily selected out of 30 investigated devices,
which all exhibited similar EL characteristics.
Figure 5
EL spectra with designated
transition energies. (a) Room temperature EL spectra obtained from
NW3, NW5, and NW6 and the respective bias parameters. Vertical lines
denote transition energies for the radiative b–b recombinations
correlating with maxima in the presented EL spectra. (b) Sketch of
the GaAs energy band structure between the Brillouin zone symmetry
points L, Γ, and X with the lowest conduction band, heavy-hole,
light-hole, and split-off valence bands with the relevant energies
obtained from ref (28): EG = 1.42 eV, EL = 1.72 eV, EX = 1.91 eV, and ESO = 0.34 eV. Radiative b–b recombinations
identified by energy values of maxima in EL spectra of investigated
NW devices are shown with colored arrows. Solid and dashed lines denote
indirect (phonon-assisted) and direct transitions, respectively.
EL spectra with designated
transition energies. (a) Room temperature EL spectra obtained from
NW3, NW5, and NW6 and the respective bias parameters. Vertical lines
denote transition energies for the radiative b–b recombinations
correlating with maxima in the presented EL spectra. (b) Sketch of
the GaAs energy band structure between the Brillouin zone symmetry
points L, Γ, and X with the lowest conduction band, heavy-hole,
light-hole, and split-off valence bands with the relevant energies
obtained from ref (28): EG = 1.42 eV, EL = 1.72 eV, EX = 1.91 eV, and ESO = 0.34 eV. Radiative b–b recombinations
identified by energy values of maxima in EL spectra of investigated
NW devices are shown with colored arrows. Solid and dashed lines denote
indirect (phonon-assisted) and direct transitions, respectively.Operated under reverse bias conditions
(cf. Figure a), these
devices exhibited a broad visible EL extending to the near-infrared.
Notably, there is no distinct emission peak that may be assigned to
the band gap energy EG = 1.42 eV of GaAs
(cf. Figure b). Under
reverse bias, the voltage is supported across the drift region of
the Schottky contact. As the moderately doped GaAs NC is embedded
between a metallic and a degenerately doped (i.e., highly conducting)
Si NW, the maximum electric field, exceeding 2 × 105 V/cm, is supposed to be located in the GaAs NC. At such high electric
fields, the conduction band Γ valley population is approaching
zero with high populations of the X and L valleys,[25] diminishing direct Γ valley transitions (i.e., EL
at the GaAs band gap energy).For EL in the visible spectral
range, distinct emission peaks can be observed with the overall maximum
shifting to higher energies for longer GaAs NCs, i.e., increasing
breakdown voltages (cf. Figure b). These distinct EL peaks are assigned to hot carrier luminescence[26,27,29] with the respective phonon-assisted
radiative b–b recombinations as sketched in the GaAs energy
band structure in Figure b. Due to the necessity of energy and momentum conservation,
light emission arising from b–b recombinations requires electrons
to be scattered from the indirect conduction band valleys to the zone
center (k ≈ 0). High phonon density of states
are related to a large number of phonon states for a certain energy
in the phonon dispersion, i.e., parts of phonon dispersion curves
with almost zero slope.[30] In the case of
GaAs, the phonon dispersion of all kinds of involved phonons exhibit
approximately zero slope at the X- and L-symmetry points.[31] Thus, a high density of states of phonons with
the respective wave vectors are available for scattering electrons
to the zone center by emission or absorption of such phonons, resulting
in the observed EL maxima. The involvement of split-off band holes
in radiative b–b recombinations in GaAs was also observed in
photoluminescence studies.[32] However, the
respective b–b transitions require adequate electron population
of the L and X valley, as well as holes in the heavy-hole, light-hole,
and split-off band.[29] The formation of
hot charge carriers in ⟨111⟩ oriented GaAs NCs further
requires electrons to gain energies higher than the impact ionization
threshold (1.8–2 eV)[25,33] through scattering
events, changing their k-vector.[24]The proposed hot charge carrier generation mechanism
is sketched in the left panel of Figure with electrons tunneling from Ga through
the Schottky barrier into the GaAs NC. Under reverse bias, a high
electric field is present in the GaAs depletion layer adjacent to
the Schottky interface, accelerating charge carriers, which in turn
attain energies in excess of the impact ionization threshold. Such
hot carriers, instead of transferring energy to phonons, lose energy
by elevating valence band electrons to the conduction band and these
generated electron–hole pairs themselves generate carrier pairs
and the process enters runaway. Simulations of the actual structures
confirmed impact ionization and also high yields of holes adjacent
to the Ga/GaAs Schottky junction (see Supporting Information 8). Remarkably, with increasing bias voltages,
EL emission extends further into the GaAs NC, which is consistent
with the impact ionization generation rate simulations.Radiative
recombinations and intraband electron scattering thus result in the
characteristic EL spectra with contributions from b–b recombinations
and Bremsstrahlung. This confirms the assumed avalanche process with
hot electrons injected from Ga into the GaAs NC, generating holes
and resulting in the observed EL. Such single-nanowire light emitters
yielded external quantum efficiencies of up to EQE = ∫(Psp/Eλ)(e/I) dλ = 8.9 × 10–7, where the emitted spectral power Psp was obtained from integrating the EL spectral power in the wavelength
range λ = 400–1000 nm. Eλ is the energy of a photon with wavelength λ, I the applied NW current, and e the elementary charge.
However, including the numerical aperture of the spectroscopy system
and considering a homogeneously light emitting GaAs segment with a
cylindrical shape, this results in a high EL spectral power density
of 14.8 mW/cm2.In conclusion, we demonstrated effective
EL from avalanche light-emitting diodes in self-assembled metal/semiconductor
NW heterostructures. The axially aligned Si/Ga/GaAs/Si NW heterostructures
were achieved via a novel approach, combining VLS NW growth, ion implantation,
and millisecond FLA. The visible spectrum of the EL is dominated by
hot carrier luminescence due to impact ionization, revealing distinct
maxima, which are correlated with GaAs interband transitions. A low
broadband exponential component of the EL is ascribed to Bremsstrahlung.
A considerable benefit of the presented approach to process heterostructures
within Si NWs is the advantageous condition for combining highly mismatched
materials, provided by efficient strain relaxation. Recent experiments
already supplied evidence for this method to be applicable to other
highly mismatched III–V/Si heterostructures, namely, InAs or
InGaAs. Furthermore, this unique method is suitable for integrating
axial metal segments into Si NWs, by only implanting metal ions. In
this study, single NW heterostructures were investigated to gain insight
into the fundamental properties of the processed light emitting devices.
However, this method could readily be applied to process a large scale
device consisting of straight Si NW arrays on bulk Si, allowing to
significantly increase device performances due to parallel operation
of numerous NW heterostructures.
Authors: Christian Borschel; Raphael Niepelt; Sebastian Geburt; Christoph Gutsche; Ingo Regolin; Werner Prost; Franz-Josef Tegude; Daniel Stichtenoth; Daniel Schwen; Carsten Ronning Journal: Small Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 13.281
Authors: Jesper Wallentin; Nicklas Anttu; Damir Asoli; Maria Huffman; Ingvar Aberg; Martin H Magnusson; Gerald Siefer; Peter Fuss-Kailuweit; Frank Dimroth; Bernd Witzigmann; H Q Xu; Lars Samuelson; Knut Deppert; Magnus T Borgström Journal: Science Date: 2013-01-17 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Mattias Borg; Heinz Schmid; Kirsten E Moselund; Giorgio Signorello; Lynne Gignac; John Bruley; Chris Breslin; Pratyush Das Kanungo; Peter Werner; Heike Riel Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2014-03-19 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Andreas Johannes; Stefan Noack; Werner Wesch; Markus Glaser; Alois Lugstein; Carsten Ronning Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2015-05-18 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Kai Zhang; Xue Bai Pitner; Rui Yang; William D Nix; James D Plummer; Jonathan A Fan Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-01-08 Impact factor: 11.205