Sarah E Tevis1, Alexander G Cobian, Huy P Truong, Mark W Craven, Gregory D Kennedy. 1. *Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI †Departments of Computer Sciences and Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI ‡Department of Surgery, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between multiple complications and postoperative outcomes and to assess which complications occur together in patients with multiple complications. BACKGROUND: Patients who suffer multiple complications have increased risk of prolonged hospital stay and mortality. However, little is known about what places patients at risk for multiple complications or which complications tend to occur in these patients. METHODS: Surgical patients were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database from 2005 to 2011. The frequency of postoperative complications was assessed. Patients with less than two complications were compared with patients who had multiple complications using χ and logistic regression analysis. Relationships among postoperative complications were explored by learning a Bayesian network model. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 470,108 general surgery patients. The overall complication rate was 15% with multiple complications in 27,032 (6%) patients. Patients with multiple complications had worse postoperative outcomes (P < 0.001). The strongest predictors for developing multiple complications were admission from chronic care facility or nursing home, dependent functional status, and higher American Society of Anesthesiologist Physical Status classification. In patients with multiple complications, the most common complication was sepsis (42%), followed by failure to wean ventilator (31%), and organ space surgical site infection (27%). We found that severe complications were most strongly associated with development of multiple complications. Using a Bayesian network, we were able to identify how strongly associated specific complications were in patients who developed multiple complications. CONCLUSIONS: Almost half (40%) of patients with complications suffer multiple complications. Patient factors such as frailty and comorbidity strongly predict the development of multiple complications. The results of our Bayesian analysis identify targets for interventions aimed at disrupting the cascade of multiple complications in high-risk patients.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between multiple complications and postoperative outcomes and to assess which complications occur together in patients with multiple complications. BACKGROUND:Patients who suffer multiple complications have increased risk of prolonged hospital stay and mortality. However, little is known about what places patients at risk for multiple complications or which complications tend to occur in these patients. METHODS: Surgical patients were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database from 2005 to 2011. The frequency of postoperative complications was assessed. Patients with less than two complications were compared with patients who had multiple complications using χ and logistic regression analysis. Relationships among postoperative complications were explored by learning a Bayesian network model. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 470,108 general surgery patients. The overall complication rate was 15% with multiple complications in 27,032 (6%) patients. Patients with multiple complications had worse postoperative outcomes (P < 0.001). The strongest predictors for developing multiple complications were admission from chronic care facility or nursing home, dependent functional status, and higher American Society of Anesthesiologist Physical Status classification. In patients with multiple complications, the most common complication was sepsis (42%), followed by failure to wean ventilator (31%), and organ space surgical site infection (27%). We found that severe complications were most strongly associated with development of multiple complications. Using a Bayesian network, we were able to identify how strongly associated specific complications were in patients who developed multiple complications. CONCLUSIONS: Almost half (40%) of patients with complications suffer multiple complications. Patient factors such as frailty and comorbidity strongly predict the development of multiple complications. The results of our Bayesian analysis identify targets for interventions aimed at disrupting the cascade of multiple complications in high-risk patients.
Authors: Arden M Morris; Laura-Mae Baldwin; Barbara Matthews; Jason A Dominitz; William E Barlow; Sharon A Dobie; Kevin G Billingsley Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Shanika de Silva; Christopher Ma; Marie-Claude Proulx; Marcelo Crespin; Belle S Kaplan; James Hubbard; Martin Prusinkiewicz; Andrew Fong; Remo Panaccione; Subrata Ghosh; Paul L Beck; Anthony Maclean; Donald Buie; Gilaad G Kaplan Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2011-07-30 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: W E Longo; K S Virgo; F E Johnson; C A Oprian; A M Vernava; T P Wade; M A Phelan; W G Henderson; J Daley; S F Khuri Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Joseph Karam; Athanasios Tsiouris; Alexander Shepard; Vic Velanovich; Ilan Rubinfeld Journal: Ann Vasc Surg Date: 2013-05-24 Impact factor: 1.466
Authors: Ray Portela; Ahmet Vahibe; Joseph N Badaoui; Omer U I Hassan; Travis J Mckenzie; Todd A Kellogg; Omar M Ghanem Journal: Bariatr Surg Pract Patient Care Date: 2022-06-08 Impact factor: 0.368
Authors: Omid Madadi-Sanjani; Christoph Zoeller; Joachim F Kuebler; Alejandro D Hofmann; Jens Dingemann; Soeren Wiesner; Julia Brendel; Benno M Ure Journal: BJS Open Date: 2021-11-09
Authors: John C Woodfield; Kari Clifford; Genevieve A Wilson; Fran Munro; James C Baldi Journal: Scand J Med Sci Sports Date: 2022-01-31 Impact factor: 4.645